Member Info for Bucolic

I didn't say it can't, I just said I don't believe it will. Just my opinion, Bruce. I hope it does though, that beach is beckoning.

Bluechip, you're getting non-believers and non-investors muddled again. Whilst I don't believe the SP will ever exceed a pound or so, I really hope it does because I'm invested. I too will be sunning myself on faraway beaches! But in the real world I'll just be happy to recover my investment and maybe make a little on the side.

Quazi_modo, why would baldy not have learnt to fly while living with the prairie chickens? Prairie chickens are not flightless birds. Yet more fantasy posted as fact!

Mmmmn, just imagine - £10 a share! I feel like going back to work now, just so I can retire again when my boat comes in. I could get the porch done as well, and a new car.... I'll tell you what, that MED3000 works a treat! Just thinking about it has given me a semi!

A fair summary, ndr50. Both sides of the arguments presented and discussed in a polite manner - except for Ananda of course, who seems compelled to lambast and insult anyone who doesn't agree with him. In fact, I'd say he is the foremost reason why this board turns into a slanging match instead of a good, honest, debate, as sb88 describes it.

the.Italian, if MED2005 contained gtn, a tried and tested vasodilator and known treatment for ED, and MED3000 doesn't; and MED2005 was proved to be more efficacious than Dermasys (MED3000) in a clinical trial, then how you can say you've never seen anything to suggest that MED3000 is inferior? Those facts speak for themselves. Whilst I agree that it will be cheaper and easier to get MED3000 to market, that doesn't make it a better product. All my opinion, of course, and I'm clearly never going to change your mind.

Bluechip, your post started well but faded spectacularly. I take it you follow sb88's argument, that this board should get rid of everyone who posts the other side of the argument so that you can have a good, honest debate with yourselves. Where's the fun in that? All it would do is end up in fantasy land, and newbies would read it and invest their life savings in something that may never come to market. Surely reading both sides in the same place is more informative. You've also made an unwarranted connection between believers/nonbelievers and rampers/derampers. I suppose you lump me in as a nonbeliever and deramper, but whilst I hope that MED3000 does boom, I don't actually believe that it will. I've already retired early so my ambitions are more ordinary than yours, but I've absolutely no inclination to top up at any price after the FM57 debacle.

baldy, don't get me wrong. I am one of those investors in a hole and hoping they'll pull a rabbit out of that hat. I lost a lot of money on Immupharma and their drug Lupuzor which also "couldn't fail." Luckily, alongside all the ramping on ADVFN, there was a chap called Hamhamham and he advised caution as you never know what might happen. Because of his wise words I didn't lose the farm, just a couple of barns and several outbuildings. The dairy was a gonner too. But it taught me a valuable lesson - never pay too much credence to people like Ananda.

It's a fair cop, the.Italian, that was a slip of the pen. I didn't mean to say that the placebo worked better than MED2005 because I know that it didn't. My other posts on that day didn't reflect that error. However, aside from my small faux pas, do you not agree that MED3000 is an inferior product to MED2005, or indeed any of the previous formulations? They were all going to make us rich, but didn't, and now MED3000 is, even though it's not as good.

"People with negative comments should be banned. Its a crying shame that they are allowed to infect good honest debate."
sb88, you clearly have no understanding of what a debate is, let alone an honest one. It's a discussion in which opposing arguments are put forward in a civilised way without the insults and vilification that come from people like Ananda if someone dares to oppose their views. Surprisingly, bald-eagle has come back to the BB with some timely advice for people who may want to invest here. I've suggested before that people don't bet the farm on it, baldy has said it's not for widows and orphans. Yes, the potential upside is huge and I hope as much as anyone else we make some money. However, FUM's track record is not inspiring. They're bringing a second rate product to market because it's easier and cheaper. Let me elucidate - MED2005 was the "sure thing" product which contained GTN, but it didn't reach endpoints at any dosage in FM57 because it wasn't sufficiently better than placebo., and therefore failed the trial. It was however more efficacious than the placebo, which became MED3000, the new "sure thing" product, which is why I called it second rate, and FUM are concentrating on that because they don't have to put it through any more trials so it's cheaper and quicker. These are facts, not pie in the sky fantasy figures of the market potential which depends on the product getting to market in the first place.

What Arturodeldia said at Easter: "Show a little Christian charity particularly in Holy Week !" Just joshing! I agree the BB seems to have gone a bit weird, but I think ADVFN is worse, with jonnybutler and Glavey constantly dragging everything down. I know some people see me as a deramper, but I'm not. I'm invested here and would like a return on my money. I just don't like to see fantasy paraded as fact and will call it out.

Well, I could hardly see my name in capital letters and not respond, could I?
To obfuscate:
to make something less clear and harder to understand, especially intentionally. (Like the BOD's statement about FM57.)

parmxz, apologies. Perhaps endless optimism would be a better choice of words rather than endless ramping.

Zwartkops admits he's playing the market, no reason at all why he shouldn't do that. It's probably a better way of making money than the rest of us sitting on our pots waiting for a multi bagger! As long as everyone is aware of his tactic of building up and knocking down then it's no different from Ananda or parmxz with their relentless ramping, imho, in fact it provides a bit of balance. Me, I've got the opposite of the Midas touch - you can guarantee that if I start day trading, I'll lose everything immediately! So I'll just sit here and watch the proceedings like a vertical game of tennis.

Surfie, nobody can tell you when the SP will rise again. However, here are some dates of note which I've just shamelessly copied from a post on ADVFN:
"There are key dates in the calendar that investors need to look out for. 24th June is the AGM where you will get an insight as to whether the company is on target to meet its objectives. They have stated in there annual report that by end of July they will submit med3000 as a medical device to EU regulators. On the 6th April this year FDA had agreed this device to a de novo classification. FDA required futura to submit another application for pre/post marketing and clinical details which is all part of the process and which futura have done. The time is such that by September this year the device could be in a position for FDA review for pre-marketing clearance. The fact that both EU And FDA have seen the full details of med3000 and not rejected it so far should breed confidence that this device could be a game changer for the company"

You can get that Alpha crap on Ebay, probably in the snake oil department. It's ingredients include ginseng and fenugreek, so if you're trying to draw comparisons with MED 3000 you're in the wrong place.

Crikey, Baldy, you started waffling before 8 in the morning yesterday, and finished just before midnight. What is up with you? It's not as though you said anything different, just a constant stream of negativity. I've noticed your bale figure of 13p is now 13p maybe 20p, where then? A constant revision up to the legendary 108p? How long have we got to put up with you?

Raptor_Fund, Med 3000 will be an OTR medication, a device rather than a drug, so whether a doctor wants to prescribe or not is immaterial, IMO.

Don't encourage him, The Italian! He's just repeating the same old crap over and over again with one clear intention.

Baldy, I see you're being disingenuous again. This is what I said to you when you first started peddling the "no active ingredients" nonsense:
"In the last RNS it was stated that Med3000 contains alcohol. Ethanol and isopropranol are found as an active ingredient in oral, parenteral, and topical (including inhalational) prescription and nonprescription drug products. Although it is primarily used because of its solvent properties to help solubilize many drugs, it also possesses several concentration-dependent pharmacological actions, including sedative, carminative, cooling, antipyretic, rubefacient, cleansing, and antiseptic properties. Does that sound like alcohol is not an active ingredient? "
Perhaps you'd be polite enough to comment on it this time, though I won't hold my breath.