RE: Morning Kim Tanker16 Jul 2019 11:43
I think we can safely say that the vertical EWT on Kim is a success - Portland commercial at 200bopd and we certainly seem to be able to get that from Kim. The big question is how to address the horizontal.
"The test data confirmed that the Kimmeridge oil pool produces from one single vertically-connected 600ft (200m) or more naturally fractured zone, extending from the deeper KL2 to at least the top of the KL4 zone. Oil production is interpreted to come from both naturally fractured limestones and calcareous shales, which is an unexpected learning."
It is not as straight forward as previously thought with the KL3 & KL4 zones, and I believe we could see a significant increase in the prognosis for the horizontal well(s) if we can get it right. We really need to get the first KL horizontal right and once we do there will be a massive upgrade in the whole acreage. I expect that we will be isolating different zones on the vertical - we still dont know were are the upper and lower zones are, or how do the fractured limestones and calcareous shales behave when isolated.
We are currently undergoing "sim-ops" to see how we can best flow from two well bores. On HH1 I don't believe we are waiting on a rig or on site preparation, I think that recent data also caused a rethink in how the horizontal there should be approached for best flow and we are carrying out further testing and analysis - "Recent pressure build-up data also indicate that the HH-1 well likely "sees" a larger connected oil volume than the 7 to 11 million barrels Xodus reported last year."
I am now having a rethink as to whether we have switched flow to Kimmeridge or if we will stay on Portland until the rig arrives for additional data, but either way we have had very positive developments for both the plays but this has caused slight delays to the drilling schedule.