RE: ...24 Mar 2020 08:10
Chuk, whatever problems TLOU have, consider that Sekaname's difficults are 40 times greater.
90+ Mw versus 2MW will take many more personnel which could be the biggest problem, iff it is believable the yanks are going to magic £450M out of the hat for them. It is conditional on those famous few letters PPA - who knows what timescale that will lead to?
If the finance is credible, it is hardly surprising that Colm was so confident that Botswana were prepared to fund us , whether we ask for $10M or $30M USD.
In the grand scheme of things it looks like chicken feed imho.
The govt will admire our board for reducing expenditure by sacrificing a good proportion of their salary leaving the expense of dewatering as the ongoing other in capex! And they appear to be considering making that expenditure self sufficient at minimal cost. Using an existing asset, a generator, to produce the power to continue dewartering :O) , Lesedi.
It seems my opinion that #4 is very superior to #3 is true, but I hope they will 'dewarter' both rather than #4 alone tbh. Why? Because I believe the scientists who report the whole area is effectively losing water which will help future progress, additional wells!
Nearly time to make a trivial purchase according to the fool. No trade is trivial imho - if you have a fiver to your name or multi-millions the number involved will vary of course!
I thought about gambling on ASX last night - GBP is fairly strong against AUD - so I comtemplated joining the spivs by offering to buy at a low price which may have dragged the price down from 4c. No trades last night so I'm glad I didn't.
I need 54782 , I hope one of the panickers who have kept the price so low is going to oblige me.