RE: Passport14 Mar 2021 16:12
Too complex, will take time and extra cost. You are also relying then on others carrying out the admin without fault and error. We need a very simple two way system, outbound and return. If you are vacced, you either have a card with a Q code that can be scanned at ANY port of entry globally or if you are a smart phone user, the app doesn't only work with the very latest versions of the operating system, you have sufficient battery for the display left, haven't got a cracked screen and didn't leave it in the car/house/taxi.
I for reasons that should be obvious favour a Q code that you can print out and keep inside your passport. It can be emailed to you by whoever keeps the record of your vac or tests. You are then not relying on your technology to actually work [and my god the number of failures I have seen at gates with people trying to use the smart phones for boarding passes]. You can also access it in difficult circumstances as long as the local feds that have just arrested you for turning left without signal have any computer with internet access! From experience? Oh yes, always email a scan of my passport to myself in case hotels insist on holding on to it lest I do a runner.
Institutions that use smart phones have a habit of believing everybody else is gun ho to have the very latest upgrade and software version and often do not follow ANSI standards and the app is as far back compatible as the child that programmed the app, i.e. any device older than 6 month will not work.
The bar code can be scanned easily outward bound and on the return. If the UK government insists on an airport test pre departure on the return leg due to red list countries, separate bar codes can be easily issued. There is in fact nothing at all for an authority to stick the 2D bar code in your passport, exactly like a visa is! If you end up with half a dozen of them, then that is just like a busy passport!
Further, tests which only capture a small amount of infected people as demonstrated by the failed test and trace which a lot of people said could never work [part of the tech reasons described above] must be only charged at cost. And if any tourist office has half a brain they would be subsidising or even covering the cost of any return leg test if required by the UK. Travellers are very savvy these days at spotting hidden prices and will switch to alternative destinations without even a shrug of their shoulders. Lots of regional airports around holiday sun spots in EU discovered this when they tried to pull the taxi con be refusing local coach access. Frankly, how many people stepping of a thirty quid flight to Araxos are then going to think it is OK to cough up another fifty quid for a taxi.
Keep it simple, for the traveller keep the tech to an absolute minimum and favour hard copies, keep the costs down or even make extras like tests free.