RE: New Tax Year26 Apr 2023 12:56
Hi AquaeS,
Many thanks for your excellent post. Yes I fully agree it was registration of interest, not any obligation to purchase. I also agree with you that it is a possibility that somehow it might be manipulated to create thousands of extra e mails, with addresses. However thats a real remote possibility, indeed one poster who I respect even told me the number in a phone call and it was higher than 49,999. I actually knew of 5 people who signed up, and all 5 actually initially purchased.
Going by this tiny straw poll and actually believing the figure I was told, its easy to see how an investor might believe that the launch is on to a winner.
So can I ask what investors actually believe, did manipulation take place , because I for one never heard any whispers of it at all on any forums, and no one mentioned it at all.
Those records probably still exist , and were they tens of thousands or just several hundred.
I've asked this question a few times and no answer returned. In my book and life experience that probably means they don't want the answer to come out. ~Its certainly not price sensitive now. Believe just after this time we heard first talk of a "soft launch", what caused that to happen....realisation that a serious error had been made in that we had thousands and thousands of false names, e mails and addresses (easily confirmed). Or a certain someone was pulled in by the team and told to drop it and its going to be a soft launch. Now I mean to offense to anyone, and I along with everyone else here lost serious money on the failed launch, but something is not right, and its got a whiff about it so all I'm doing is trying to get to the truth of the matter.. Then it WILL be put to bed.
If anyone can spread any light on it, it would be appreciated.