RE: Contract30 Oct 2020 19:43
indeed Iamrich the contract could be finalised & announced anytime from now to the end of the year, however don't forget that announcement came with a statement indicating that the courts would be petitioned jointly to allow shipments by removing the banks objection, unfortunately the higher court ruled that lower courts ruling to permit shipments was announced the day before a booking for an iron ore ship showed up on the Santana port schedule.... hence the BUZZ over whether it was for DEVS ore, nobody guaranteed it & it was never proven/indicated otherswise until YapYap noticed the post on the ports facebook page (well done MD :-))
if others did not read, accept or understand the caveats that most posters included, then hopefully a lesson has been learnt & in the future people will conduct their own research, make up their own minds & invest/buy/sell accordingly without throwing blame elsewhere.
i agree that the speculation should have been addressed by the BoD but it wasn't & additionally we don't yet know who bought Vila Nova or whose Been appointed as shipper & broker for DEVS ore.
from other posts I assume the Bi-polar brat has got nappy rash again (usually happens when the SP falls & he gets the gripes over his 'paper' losses) & is busy berating & blaming anyone who thought that in the absence of evidence otherwise the Xin may have been for DEVs ore.... personally I'd take more notice & put more credence by what's in its nappy than it's written.