Member Info for Balanced66

Captain Stanley and Common Spence = CS initials! Is that a clue?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/07/03/opinion/coronavirus-tests.amp.html

Think you need to post a few times before you can put up links.

The above has been previously posted. I'm not aware that any company has successfully launched a paper or strip test.

What would be the cost of the Avacta test? Apparently The Avct BB had posters showing the Medusa website charging a price of £60?

For mass testing, if it was adopted, the cost would have to be really low £60 would not be accepted I'd say £5 or less. With the profit sharing with Medusa and all the other costs would that be viable for Avct?

Our test is perhaps around the £5-£8 mark and it only requires a lab technician or one of the Q16/32 machines.

Can't see it being adopted on a big scale where it matters - there they are going for accurate point of care rapid testing or high throughput testing.

bin = in

So all this time you've been trying to scare nervy holders who have probably sold because of your antics good mind to report you.

I did suggest to you bin one of my earlier posts that you were confused but you have been on here saying Truspine is fake etc.

Your business is with Truspine so I suggest you don't post on here again.

I hold a number of miners. This one was one of the first ones I bought for the pf.

It's a stock that even Benjamin Graham of value investing fame would also approve of imo - most of the criteria are there such as price to book value, to sales and it can also be classed as a growth.

If they can sell the mine for a tidy sum that would lead to a good re-rating imo. A re-rating should also come soon hopefully with results and pog.

Hopefully get some news on the other programs. TM did suggest there would be news on these as well.

Not just a gold play. Looks undervalued. Imo Dyor.

You look it up for yourself Captain as you come here as the self appointed expert.

If it's a genuine question you do your research first and then come back I can see the game you seem to be playing you seem to have a lot of people responding to you on this board when we have just had the best update so far.

If you have nothing new (and you don't) you should go away or you may be reported.

We don't mind genuine discussion and criticism but you keep coming back with the same stuff when people here have already responded to you.

He seems to appear when there's momentum building either to distract sap our energies or he is shorting and thinking he alone can keep the share price down. Best to not respond to him imo, he is taking the focus away from this board when we want to discuss what the company is doing.

We know NPT works because It's based on Nova's normal PCR test which works.

NPT should be even better because quicker processing of samples so less chance of errors in results. All as "rapid" testing.

The one step (I'm just calling it that) coated tubes will add further ease and should reduce testing times even more perhaps to 45 minutes.

Momentum is building up so the excellent results should build up going forward.

Also shows that there is momentum here in NPT without the care home trial it's not dependent on that imo as the discussion suggested a few days ago.

This is what stood out most for me - everything else was fantastic as well:

"A number of NHS hospitals are already using Novacyt's NPT system in hospital departments. Pilot programmes are underway in surgical, cancer and imaging departments where rapid, accurate testing is a pre-requisite to the patient receiving care. In addition, the NPT system is being used in the private sector, such as professional sport and mining industries. The Company is currently evaluating other markets where the NPT system could be used for rapid and frequent COVID-19 testing."

Potential market just in UK is huge and we have a lead - DNAnudge was September or October we are there in the NHS as well.

Captain is becoming very repetitive now and brings nothing new.

I got through earlier today as well and it was answered by someone

MM are the first to know usually if a company is in trouble yet it's been mentioned that it had been easy to sell but hard to buy.

I've read the terms and conditions of posting a poster cannot delete a post a request has to be made to LSE and they are usually slow maybe remove the next day.

Didn't anyone else here see Messi's alleged post of crime numbers etc?

Yeah Messi if you are genuine you can repost and to make it easy you can send each numbered request in a separate post less chance of it being taken off. You never mentioned before today that you had posted this information previously and it was taken off. So send 1. In first post then rest:

1. Investigating police officers name.
2. Phone number that they can be contacted on.
3. Police investigation number.

I never saw it - you can repost

He may have been scammed by someone pretending to issue shares to him etc.

That's very different to saying Truspine are a fake company. If his allegations were true we would have received an announcement from Prim by now. A " fake" company does not change its status from private to public. One of its directors has held positions in many previous companies including Tiziana Life Sciences (Tils).

All imo.

Eva joined LSE in June this year. Nolupus has been around for a lot longer. Reading Eva's last post on SNG board she is not happy that Nolupus somehow persuaded or discouraged other investors there to reduce their holdings because they could have lost their shirts.

The result was not known and it was never clear which way it was going. Despite all the " best" research until results are seen it means nothing. We all know what happened with Imm's last P3 trial after a successful P2 trial yet it failed (it may have been trial design rather than drug failure). If you are prepared to bet everything before a trial result in your"belief" in a company just because they have spent 15 years researching then good luck to you I see that as no different to gambling in the bookies and was the reason why I chose not to invest more than 2% of my portfolio on SNG.

You got lucky this time but with your approach it's a matter of time before you risk losing all your gains and capital on your best speculative trades -happens all the time read people's horror stories on the LSE boards.

I can only see that Nolupus gave very sensible advice to people there - drugs fail P2, P3 trials all the time. Only private investors would risk so much on biotechs professional investors would never do that and biotech would only form a tiny percentage of their portfolios.