Member Info for badshah13

In Blue for a change..!!

I am not sure what kind of communication people expect from them? Weekly schedule of their meetings? They have said they are in advanced talks and until that clicks in they can't provide more news.. it might not work out, who knows but I am hoping there is more than one company interested. And why would they not take their salaries? I would too do the same and most people moaning would do the same, as it's not a charity.. however I do believe that they could have invested some of that salary back into VAL by getting more shares..

Vote Yes for both resolutions. Let BOD do what they are planning. Voting NO will complicate things and take a lot lo get to materialise and as seem from this BB, people are not patient with this - so voting NO doesn't make sense for those. Pharma deals take forever and I would have been surprised if they got a good deal without money in the bank or potential source of funding. It common sense, just try selling a house to someone who knows you are desperate for cash and you would understand the reason for this move from VAL.

Same.. I am Confused what's happening..?? I was at 95% profit but suddenly it's only 10%. I was here 5 since last 5 y3ars but sold out before Newmount walkout.. got back in again as I thought this was the best state GGP has ever been.. I hope that's true.. good luck all..

As expected, this was pumped up on friday afternoon. It would be back in 60s shortly..

In their expectation to release the RNS after close on weekend for people to dig3at the news and NOT overreact or panic. Sp this morning proves this to me. It shows they are contious about the sp and thinking about holding the value.. this was have tanked a lot more if it was 7 am RNS today or any other day.. on the negative side, sp did not go below 2p for me to get another top up in.. I am voting yes as my proxy vote.

I think someone is playing up with this.. It is most likely to finish red on Monday..

Bwgs - I share same views, I think science is good and if this drops to under 2p again, I will top up.. MCAP of VAL is silly and there is big upward potential once the funding is sorted for long term and the deal for 401 will surely sort this out.. when will that be, even Satu won't know. Then the deal for 201 will rocket this...

Bwgs - I share same views, I think science is good and if this drops to under 2p again, I will top up..

I think voting NO might cause problems again. It all depends if you think that value of the product doesn't exist then vote NO and let them get into a hole. But if you think the products do have a Value, then voting NO might not help. If VAL is desperate for cash, they might end up with a big loan at exponential interest rate instead. This is like wine, until the time is right, you have to keep the barrel going and spend money on it but only if you trust their product. I do trust the product but I am sceptical about actions of BOD.

I know it will tank but I am hoping that there won't be a huge spike downward in panic..

I agree nomlungu - BOD are aware of the situation and the sentiments. they probably wanted to prevent panic selling and control the damage if it helps.

Guys, just found about this RNS now as I don't expect RNS after closing especially on weekend. Lot of time for people to think about, Monday will tell us if this extra time was good or bad for sp . 1. I would like BOD to assure if they can give current holders the first choice into any discounted placings or else placing should be at let's say at last 5 days average market price. I don't want to see these going for bargain to drag the sp further south. 2. BOD to commit at taking 50% of their salary in the form equity in the open market on a fixed day of the month. I would say at least for next 1 year. I think closed period won't apply if the date and value to purchase is pre decided and I have seen this in other companies e.g OXB where chairman buys at the market price as part of this salary. This would give some confidence to share holders and save on limited amount of cash they have. I think Satu is correct that they need to have an insurance of funds in order to negotiate a good deal and I have said this before too.. if buyer knows you are desperate for cash, they would take advantage of you and it happens in routine life too... As far as my points 1 and 2 are met, I don't mind additional placing if it has to be.. regarding timing I think BOD underestimated the time required for negotiations as I know pharma deals can take forever. If people agree with my views, We as a group of PI s can write to VAL with our expectation before GM for them to think about.. Send me msg if you agree so that we can initiate something.

Added few more.. hopefully this won't drift down further..

In recent interviews K A has been saying that if they require funding, then PHE would look for non dilutive options to hold the LTH value. This is clearly different to what is said.. I am not impressed. I understand they would require money but he should not be saying things which he can't do.

Six 100% owned projects in safe jurisdiction - Ernest Giles drill campaign underway, includes plans for 24 RC holes at Meadows - read more here: https://t.co/jxrXOW8EVQ

Where did u find it's Toyota investing here?

I am still unable to understand the reason for drop from 2p+ earlier in the week.. it's over 25% in very short time without any reason.

After the rise to 0.039p a month ago. I am not sure how the sp could be turned around as they don't announce every deal as RNS nor they do the value of the same.

Uncanny - I am thinking same about temptation to buy more but have been heavily invested here already and don't want risk more than I could..