Member Info for Arsenal221

Main think I want a.s.a.p is the above, so hope that comes up over next 4 or so working days.

I also agree that overall even though not great on having to wait on the hearing & also being de-listed, it looks very likely that the 1st had to come about on sorting the Hopeless out & on the 2nd, for some it might have been a blessing in disguise on as far as keeping sp where it was when de-listed. Otherwise a good chance sp would have dropped in a big way.

Received & as mentioned did not reply.

Thanks

Agree that hearing should not last more than 2/3 days & on as far as an appeal, is concerned then that might not happen anyway if Frr's evidence is as strong as it looks or maybe even better, due to the evidence not seen.

Anyway at lease we are now in February & closing in on the full hearing, if no OOCS.

I will go with the SB post from ii that I reposted on here yesterday.
Generally saying that Frr on the damages claim look positive of which should mean the Default is dealt with in a positive way for Frr.

Thanks

On as far as Grand Court list is concerned does the court normally put them out month on month or by each week?

Fozz, on the Fiduciary case I would say 80-20 in FRR favour (from what we know). Hence this is why I have been preemptively mulling on what could Hope’s defence be. Plus add the granting of the Discovery Order in the Californian District Court and the assertion of ‘illegal interference and you have a strong case. Plus we shouldn’t forget the company’s recent track record on litigation. Finally, must remember that it is FRR who have brought the case against him so they must have accumulated some evidence to bring this claim?

Yes, the Shorters must be as worried (if not more) than the longs. Relisting is in the open Market now and hence IG reducing the cash margin to 50%.

Now, ask yourself if a new O&G company was to float on AIM sitting on on a huge onshore deposits of oil &natural gas on the doorstep of Europe, and had already spent inexcess of $400m in the field, plus was in discussions with Super Majors, what initial market value would you ascribe? What we don’t know what the three oil wells are producing. Finally, the new $60m loan could also make a huge difference to the opening Market cap.

Anyway you look it, February is going to be a telling month.

LOL

Congratulations on another beautiful baby.
Enjoy

A positive on Frr coming through this, is as previously mention of which is that Frr are still talking of work carrying on over the coming months.
So as far as the damages claim, is concerned. All of what has been seen shows that Hopeless has clearly showed on doing Frr/shareholders harm. So on hearing going Frr's way that should put to bed the dodgy Default that Hopeless was always aiming on going through.

I am thinking full hearing will not be until w/c 25 Feb.

The court has now seen all the evidence & cannot see any reason why the claim of damages will not be ruled on in a around 4 weeks from now.

Info on ii under above heading, looks incorrect. Their Nomad & Broker, was Arden.

Poster says that a share has just given up WHIreland as joint broker & Nomad of which Frr might be able use to their advantage.

Raising of the margins, is that slightly positive or is it for shorters & if so positive or negative for them.
Thanks

Read traders post on 24/ Dec.
I feel just another one of those WOSpace.

Tsbs
He can only get the shares that he needs, if shareholders start selling & if they do it would be at a fraction of the closing sp unless he was getting very desperate & put his bid up.

Will add that as Frr do definitely look as though they are putting out there positive vibes on this then would think that at lease some of that would be from what they have heard from the court.

On above would think that it is unlikely a judgement on Frr case will be released by the court this week. If it is then would think it would have something to do with an OOCS.

On as far as the full hearing is concerned I am thinking that the the judge, just might be be on his way to a judgement on that before hand, in his mind or maybe a rough draft of the judgement As he would have a very good idea on the evidence he would have seen already.

If the above was right then he would still hear the hearing, as that might shed some new light on how this has all come about.

Above are just my ideas & might be totally wrong.

Zib
That can only happen if the hearing is ending or maybe at least started.