RE: My 10 cents9 Jul 2022 11:29
TBH I'm not sure what any discussion around a potential JV is going ...
> KIlimapesa mine = 100% owned working mine 1koz/month to 2koz/month over next 5-6 months
> Kilimapesa MRE = 531koz > 800koz+ MRE awaited updated JORC & regional drilling from FCF underway
> Nyakafuru project = 'mine ready' 658koz MRE based on open pit & CIL processing
> NYakafuru Reefs = 400k 'Add-On' project awaiting acquisition confirmation
IMHO & from prior 4-July calculations Kilimapesa anticipated production:
Q2 = max 1,097oz/month from Plants 1 & 2 only "possible" vs. 900oz "best guess"
Q3 = max 1,689oz/month from Plants 1, 2 & 3 only "possible" vs. 1,200oz "best guess"
Q4 = max 1,689oz/month from Plants 1, 2 & 3 only "possible" vs. 1,500oz "best guess"
Dec-22 = max 2,577oz/month from Plants 1, 2, 3 & 4 (1x 30kt pad) only "possible" vs. 2,000oz "best guess"
Using RM stated AISC $1,250 then Kilimapesa is kicking out considerable FCF using 'Best guess' & $1,800 POG:
Q2 @900oz = 900oz*(1,800-1,250) = $495k or £410k minimum
Q3 @1,200oz = 1,200oz*(1,800-1,250) = $660k or £548k minimum
Q4 @1,500oz = 1,500oz*(1,800-1,250) = $825k or £685k minimum
Dec-22 @2koz = 2koz*(1,800-1,250) = $1,100k or £913k minimum
IMHO I think AISC will come down as more HL comes online so FCF should rise by 5-15% for the same gold produced. I also think my 'Best Guess' figure is very conservative & should be beaten. We know Kilimapesa $300k/month drilling campaign runs to Dec-22 but is easily affordable versus FCF being generated.
1) Kilimapesa - no compelling need or reason for a JV as operational mine is a 100% owned cash cow company maker
2) Nyakafuru - mine build ought to be via debt & secured on Kilimapesa mine & FCF
A JV is an alternative method of funding, but at cost of %share of asset, profit and/or NSR ... GCAT should be checking debt-funded route first and then if all else fails consider a JV. If POG recovers to $2k or outperforms as many predict, then the 'value' of a JV drops off very quickly versus debt-funded options.
JVs work well for explorers with a good asset but no revenue to develop it and trade a %share of asset for cash for an agreed $spend to drill it out over an agreed period. GCAT is not in that camp ... BUT if it decided to it should be at a much lower %share as it could contribute to both CAPEX and OPEX costs.
ATB APR