Member Info for Apre

Now you play the 'bully' card . . . just how small and fluffy are your cojones?

Yes, watch them and laugh at them.

Riesgo . . . six posts today lamenting the imagined delay and implying that the CEO decides what and when to release news, based on " . . . when our expectations were not met at the end of Q4 we were told . . .". blah blah blah.

"Our" expectations? First, I would be very disappointed if AS gave a moments thought to what flaky PI's post on LSE. Second, 'my' expectations are still intact. Because I am a mature, rational adult who has at least a little understanding of how business and scientific trials are conducted and who stopped wearing nappies when I was two years old.

Jesus, Maria y Jose, Riesgo, hombre. Grow up. Grow a pair. Get your nappy changed . . . or just stop being an amateur FUD spammer.

FFS.

Why indeed . . .?

Small minds obsess about small things. Large minds ignore petty details and focus on the bigger picture.

Too many small minds posting petty, personal whinges.

Some seasoned comics on here this morning.

Thanks of the heads up Diggers2.

Normal service has been resumed . . . we're back on the Trial of the Lonesome Pain.

(See what I did . . ?)

Just fancied a cheeky little SB top up before the close, but IG have gone Closing Only again.

I fancy an RNS tomorrow, maybe they do too.

Not "everyone", B. Some of us retain our critical faculties without being drawn in to the idiocracy. Actually, quite a lot more than is given credit for . . .

And I don't want to split hairs but, " . . .people are more interested in the size of Kim Kardashian’s rear and Katie Price’s tits than the crimes being committed by U.K. Gov - hand in hand with big Pharma!" . . . I'm no expert but I thought that . . . Kim Kardashian’s rear and Katie Price’s tits . . . were in fact crimes being committed by big Pharma. But WTFDIK.

Agreed, accessible, layman-friendly read. Makes sense of the path Avacta appear to be taking.

Credit to Muck165 for the link at 22.37hrs last night.

140,000 shares . . . probably another bijoux chompette by Ditra.

crowfoot, I am also a LTH of Avacta (SIPP, ISA, Share a/c) but I also have a few SBs for interest too. So in fairness, perhaps not too curious?

Perhaps more curious is that currently IG are not accepting Long positions, not allowing existing SB limits to be raised, are showing in their so-called stats that activity in the last hour is 100% Sells and that all activity today is 100% Sells. Clearly, nonsense.

IG are the issue here, not the PIs being manipulated by them.

An "Epiphany" on the 6th would add a little quirky charm. The three kings bringing gifts of data, biopsies and licensing deals.

I empathise PL75, but from time to time I feel obliged to expose this charlatan for what it is. My guiding principles though are, only expose it for the dishonest, FUD spamming manipulator it is and never give it any genuine credibility . . . or sardines.

Thats me done . . .

". . . The results are later than forecast with no news from the company as to why."

This is a lie. There was never a "forecast". The company have provided the "news" they are required to (not necessarily what some PIs want . . .) via RNSs. This is just a poor and transparent attempt to FUD spam for a lower entry.

"Therefore some are reducing their holdings just in case."

This is entirely supposition based on no tangible evidence whatsoever. As such, it is a dishonest attempt at transparent FUD spam in the hope that some nervous investors may sell and perhaps effect a lower SP . . . and therefore a lower entry point for self-serving traders.

Terry, stop being a properkok.

Or should that be who is Mr Adventurous . . . or who is Ndn . . .?

BV . . . you are like the sweaty little informer in the old spy movies . . . keeps changing taxis thinking he can give "them" the slip. When all the time, its the taxi firm thats keeping tabs on him. Remind us, how many IDs have you had . . . and still have . . .

You have it in for RAH like you had it in for Ophidian . . . jealousy . . . based on your common background (apparently) in pharma and your distinct unpopularity compared to their popularity (ok, not with everyone . . . but way more than you) . . . so transparent, so sad.

And now you are going to lash out at me and ask me what I contribute to the BB (standard come back from wounded egotists). Well not what you do; pedantry, pettiness, pseudo science and cut and paste rip offs . . . go on, ask me.

Terry, you can't possibly be a FUD spammer with garbage efforts like yours . . . so that only leaves comedian. But you are so unfunny it is painful.

Terry, mate . . . Tel . . . Tel boy! Stop making a complete plonker out of yourself. People are laughing at you. It's embarrassing.

Derek, from my previous post,

"One of their stock phrases is, "nothing posted on these BB's effects the SP" knowing quite well that FUD is spread to achieve exactly that result. . . . They are low people whose MO is premised on the assumption that we are all too stupid to spot their transparency. Low and deluded.

LDA . . . from my last post . . ."They are low people whose MO is premised on the assumption that we are all too stupid to spot their transparency. Low and deluded.".