RE: Chief Research Officer31 Aug 2025 14:14
No porkies, no AI.
Probably I should have used AI. It would be instructive to try AI , and see what it comes up with. AI is rather wonderful.I t draws upon all the material available on the internet (far more than any of us would be able to find and assimilate) and produces an answer impartially based on all of it.
Stockopaedia's conclusion on QBT is very succinct: 'a sucker stock'. I wonder if it uses AI?I don't know.
One thing i do know though is that if I used AI to come up with an assessment of QBT's merits and prospects and that assessment was negative, OSD would post that I was telling porkies, that I had not used AI at all, and that the post was entirely composed by me! That response would make some sense: I am very surprised that OSD asserts that my unfavourable assessments of QBT are impartial conclusions reached by AI, drawing upon all ithe information available.
OSD flatters himself (that is not a first) if he imagines that AI would find anything much about him and his church from which to compose a post. That said, such little material as there is has all been provided by him, so any AI generated post relating to his church and ministry must necessarily be based on material he has provided, and will be impartial, fair and unbiased.
Oh dear, OSD , what a tangled web you weave when you practice to deceive!