Member Info for alfista

I think, in order for you to make that claim, it would be polite to vinnyt to explain what your user name was at the time. Shareholders here got shares in SiS, at an initial value of 53p, now nudging 80p, a clear gain for those who held. No point bickering if you didn't is there. Colb, the complicated bit is understanding how you make out you need 2 or 3p to break even. You were saying that before you sold what you said was most of your holding. Just for fun, here's a little maths. Let's say you held 1 million shares at 2p, (If you didn't I don't understand what the fuss is about) 1m @ 2p = �20k you sold 80% -800,000 @.4p, for �3,200 The remaining 20% -200,000, would need to reach 8.1p for you to break even. Achievable, but only if the brand launch was the biggest of the big IMHO. Best of luck with that

Quite content with SiS thanks, picked up a lot of shares pre the split, adding the two sp's together shows a profit. So you saw one thing, and I saw another, that's shares for you. So you don't want there to be collaboration with By Health because it isn't instantly profitable, why would you hold, do as Colb did and sell, then pretend you have an average ignoring your losses. Free market. You also don't want star billing, inexorable progress, and talks with global brands. That looks illogical to me, but again, I do want those things. You want to visit anarchy on the company, and I very strongly do not. You want to reinvent your ID from time to time, what exactly are you hiding ? Even your pal Mutt is more consistent. As for cut and paste, were you expecting them to write a new way of saying the same thing each time? Again that lacks logic. No, my opinion is clear, you are just here to cause aggro. Again.

The most important signal I take is the attitude of DSM, and they continue to give Fruitflow top billing. Shareholder apathy is just moany baloney, anyone can click that button any time they wish. Agitating for change, with absolutely no idea of a plan B, ands in tears, seen it on other shares. Like, buy/hold, don't like, sell. You just keep cropping up with a new ID periodically, trying to lead the revolution. Noise.

Everyone knows what they invested in. Assuming that most of the grumps bought in the early rush in 09, they have to ask themselves if they bought in on fundamentals, or on expectation and BB hype. The mcap was most certainly too high at that point, and could be justified only by the much discussed possibility of a takeover by a global. In my view, that hope expired in 2010 when the AA with DSM was proposed and then verified. Very easy to judge that DSM have a long term strategy on developing products. There was only liquid Fruitflow at that stage, and DSM immediately started on the powder format development as being far more commercial, so it has proved so far. It was explained to us in podcasts that globals take a long time to adopt new products. I took that on board, and fully appreciated that I had no way of knowing how long that time lapse would be, still don't.

Risk; The company says that larger brands are working on launches of Fruitflow products, up to you to decide whether you accept that risk. Reward: Just one with the right sort of major backing it would change sentiment completely. Pred. Funny reading you on your main board, then on here. Has someone stolen your password?

The patents and IP protection are vital. Without those there is no value for shareholders. Under the terms of the Alliance Agreement, that task remains with Provexis, all other marketing responsibilities were taken on by DSM until Provexis retail began in mid 2016. Patents and IP have been maintained and expanded incrementally, each further research development by Prof. Asim and Dr Niamh has resulted in further health claims being added to the original. Two major claims are very recent, BP regulation and alleviation of particulate emission symptoms. Provexis' role, to secure the benefits of all health claims for shareholders, have been carried out. So, again, where is the shambles? Doesn't wash, it is a mixture of sentiment massage by some, and grumpy oldster by others IMHO.

Presumably your bet is personal conjecture and nothing else too?

I was thinking of the first AIM listing, thought it was 06. As you say, some take every single post as a personal affront to their own indisputable view. "If we do not dare to dream" Agree with you, a measuring point about to arrive. Consecutive period end RNS's keep insisting that larger customers are on the way. More than revenue figures, that is the thing that we all hope for. I'm convinced that supporting a major launch would dip revenues short term, but having a "household name" brand would be the game changer for sentiment IMHO

May be wrong, but I don't think Provexis existed in 04. Nevertheless, it would appear to be the very first news of the discovery. Terms like "seems to" have long since been replaced with scientific and clinical proof. We all want what Wheelds wants, more commercial progress, but really better not to try to manufacture news, all it does is stir the grumblers. Doesn't take much.

Was multi tasking, 3/10 is generous. I'm not going to argue, there is no point whatsoever, your mind is made up, as witnessed by your posts. So be it

I can't respond in kind as the site will not give me that privilege. So I have to take it on the chin, no choice. Simply don't agree with you, I think your current morose condition is regrettable, but not based on anything that the assumptions you are making whilst feeling that way.

"Sells" at well over Bid have been going on for quite a while. If MM's didn't want shares, they would pay less, or drop the Bid. They have done neither. Don't know what's happening, the sharp rise on Friday can't be explained by any big volume. At the very least it should have helped the chronic depression of some, but miracles are unlikely. As for Preposterouspig, claiming his statins nave no side effects. To coin a phrase, good grief.

Bingo ! It hasn't changed at all, Bid is the same, Ask is the same

Agree with that. The stated intention following acquisition from the founder was to turn SiS from a regional product sold to hobby cyclists in to global brand appealing to all sports, be they professional or enthusiasts. Ceasing growth investment could well have resulted in modest profits on a modest turnover. Value continues to be added by expanding marketing reach as far as possible, and that has years to run IMO. A turnover of many 10's of millions appeals to larger investors, and, ultimately, to an outright purchaser. Only my view, but I think that could be 3-5 years away. Importantly for me, I see that being at a higher level than today's.

Took my car to the garage. The spark plugs were wonky, and the lights flashed on and off. I told the mechanic that it shouldn't be like that, because I had been using a superior lubrication. I was so cross with the lubricant maker that I shall now plague his website with complaints. Just not good enough

Just for you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJUhlRoBL8M

Just thought that the cast of "Les Miserables" on the other channel should consider this. http://www.nexexchange.com/company-all-latest-trades?isin=GB00B0923P27&listingtypeid=PLSU

Promising indeed. Another good day. I'm reminded of a podcast from David Morgan from a while back, where he said he wouldn't mind being head of a �200 m turnover company, with a �2 share price. The first part of that equation looks to be eminently achievable.

It was, but would need to be promoted to potential new buyers, otherwise a few would swap from Frutflow+Omega3, leaving no net gain. The "other retail channels" may be a better bet, getting it listed on e sellers to sports people for example. The links posted by Hammer on iii show us, yet again, the prominence DSM are giving to Fruitflow. Real commitment.

I wonder if the launch will coincide with the results this year. Good idea, marketing limitations, or rather cost of, could be the delay.