Member Info for alfista

It's a non issue really, but when the script is identical, I feel that they are taking the rise out of admin, especially the Pukman series of ID's.

I guess the admin personnel must have changed since your last Pukman ID was banned. Your MO is identical, latch on to my every post and attempt to wind me up. Not going to happen, I'll just report as I was told to. Multi-ID posters seem to love this site. Hey ho

A reasonable, calm reflection on the current state of play from Wellsite on the other channel IMHO Throughout the waiting process, I've always appreciated that supplying one of the globals isn't as easy as throwing a switch. Planning of production goes right back to basics. If a major were planning a requirement for thousands of tonnes of Fruitflow annually, and obviously could not countenance any delay in supply at any time of year, then the raw material would have to be sourced, and perhaps processed, in more than one region of the world. That would need forward planning, and investment, on a very large scale. DSM are well capable of handling that, but the contract details to protect the interests of supplier and client, right through the chain, would be substantial. I've never understood the folks who thought this could be an instant thing, since at its source it has a naturally grown raw material. Having more patents in place may also keep moving the goalposts, but anyone who understates the important of a patent is just a nonsense IMO. If we get no update, if we have to wait until the full report, then so be it, the whingers will reign for a period. Talk of DSM being the bully in the playground haven't read the DSM philosophy, or appreciated the vital role that inventors play in their total business. They need us, we need them.

Morning all. Just to be clear Colby, no I didn't report your post. I did report Percy, vile abuse, and he reported mine for simply pointing out what company law says. Strange, I don't make the law. Bern/sphinx. I agree that we don't exactly know if the prime purpose of the RNS was to report the sales increase or confirm the funding. Both were important, both could affect the way investors considered the company and so could be described as price sensitive Personally, the commitment of DSM to marketing, and the commitment of Prof. Asim and Dr Niamh to continued widening of the scope of health benefits, are the reason for my own confidence. Let others see shadows, those are two tangible factors that can't be denied.

Why do you confuse an opinion with a fact. A fact is a known, and you don't. As for the other multi ID poster claiming to be the only one who is realistic. Again, that is an opinion masquerading as a known. At least Snuffler on the other board qualifies his gloom, but again, only in his own opinion, but still trying to involve others in his personal tunnel vision. Said before, it is perfectly legitimate to disagree with you. You hand out abuse willy nilly, I take the rise.

Looks to me that we need to get some sandwich boards printed so that "Les Miserables" can parade outside tube stations. Can only say, in all sincerity, I'm glad I don't inhabit their worlds, nigh on unbearable. Dior, genuine sympathy. I hope you have folks close to you that you can share your anxieties with, and believe that human empathy is more powerful than any pill. I was amazed to read that you are still using the Swanson giant capsules, surely Fruitflow + Omega 3 would be far easier to obtain, and to take?

Bless, You have a real fetish for criticising me don't you. Percy, I don't think SiS is a disaster, I'm in profit there and expect a whole lot more. I think the job done by the company in establishing a global brand is excellent, and the list of insti investors underpin the commitment to SiS becoming a very valuable company. I'm well content with SiS. You got SiS shares, and sold them, your bad.

The difference is that I have never claimed to know timescales, because I had no way of knowing, whereas you pretended to know, then set yourself up for a whinge when it didn't arrive. There is no way of overplaying a patent, it is what it is. I have never linked that to "a deal". Provexis keep giving the marketing arm of DSM more tools to work with, which I view as a good thing, whereas you wanted the whole research project mothballed years ago, a strategy that would have been lunacy IMO. If Fruitflow has even more potential applications, then the scientists have a duty to explore them. Taking the Ned Ludd approach is so typically you.

Yes, indeed the many patents are very important. Prof Asim and Dr Niamh are the scientific support that is crucial. Now. When you bought your shares, did you look at the market cap at that time? Did you know the timescale involved in the development process? A clear answer please.

Read it folks. Patents are granted on no more important issues than grasping at straws! There is no point in anyone inventing a thing now, Percy has spoken.

Let's put that one to bed for good. I didn't buy big in 09, I didn't post that I had bought big in 09. You are welcome to trawl back as you wish, but the post you recall is a figment of your imagination. I have bought many times since, and the buys pre the split with SiS worked out very well. I bought through PrimaryBid in 3 placings. I don't rule out buying again, though my new investment cash is committed in the short term. I hold shares in a variety of other companies too, sector spread is just sense to me. Some show a big gain, some a modest gain, others are negative. Pretty much the same as most I would think, very very few post on a single share because they overcommitted to it. Staggering that you dismiss a full patent as an excuse. Millions worry about city atmosphere effects on their lungs and circulation in every city of the world, and you see no leverage in having the health claim, claiming that those hundreds of millions will take no notice ! What a dark place your head is in.

As said before, a negative view is your right, but not telling lies about what I have written. You must stop that. Referring to my post count also means nothing, I have posted on lots and lots of companies over the nine years I have been registered, having bought and sold in more shares than I care to look up. Totally my own business. What others did is up to them, nobody forces anyone to press the buy button. You speak for you, alone, no one else, trying to rule the roost got you banned before as Redprince, and that is just plain fact. Predators is right, a product which reduces thrombosis, aids bloodflow, regularises blood pressure, aids exercise induced inflammation, and now reduces the effects of airborn particulate emissions, should be talked about positively, something you have never done. You don't even take it.

How can anyone claim to know what "the vast majority" did, when they bought, what they hold, what they sold ? I imagine there are an awful lot of holders, hundreds, maybe thousand, far more than post on chat boards. Delusional. I agree with you "Sphinx". We all take responsibility for our actions. Certainly this poster did not go all in in 09, that would represent risk off the scale. Any who did were engaged in mad speculation IMHO

Dr Sarah Brewer and Dr Niamh O Kennedy ring any bells in your mind? How about all the briefings to medical professionals conducted by DSM at numerous conferences globally? Or the work in Germany, and Poland, directly targeting general practitioners. Strewth man, it must be dark in that cave!

If you add up your previous ID posts, nearly a draw! There you go, paragraph three, straight out of the famous list of put downs. Stop doing it. You said there would be no medical advocacy. There already has been a lot, in UK and several other countries. Medical professionals being briefed on the benefits of Fruitflow. Am I right or not?

I don't think you understand Princey. There was a reason you were banned as Redprince, that being that you engage with others is a derisory and overbearing way. Maybe best to consider that before you dig out the old Redprince Little Book of Put Downs. To discuss the company, and the question asked by "tinopener". Your response is in denial of known facts isn't it. Would you care to review the evidence and revise your comment? I think you should. Being negative is one thing, being untruthful quite another. We saw, through the excellent work of gixer, news that a patent had been granted in support of Fruitflow being an effective treatment for what is arguably the most important health issue for city dwellers worldwide. My view is that this is a strong positive, I can't see why any holder would wish to belittle it.

So why did you get a ban Princey?

Yes, and recognise that it is a very slow process. Better for the near future that commercial products featuring the new health claim appear, and/or that the press pick up on the news. Particulate emissions are a hot topic.

New patent :- "Results ADP is a natural platelet agonist stored in platelets and is released upon platelet activation; it induces a strong initiation of platelet aggregation. Diesel particulate matter (PM) also strongly induces platelet aggregation. In contrast, non-polluted Ti02 particles did not induce significant aggregation at equivalent concentrations. Moreover PM further promoted the platelet aggregation induced by ADP. The combination of ADP plus PM is inducing a stronger platelet activation response than the sum of the individual platelet activation responses induced by ADP or PM alone. Interestingly Fruitflow� was also able to inhibit the platelet aggregation induced by PM. Thus the area under the aggregation curve (AUC) was significantly decreased by 30% from 18606 to 13079. and the maximal percent aggregation (max % aggr.) was significantly decreased by 28% from 37% to 27% in the presence of Fruitflow� (Table 1 and Figure 1). Finally, the platelet aggregation which is promoted by the combination of ADP and PM is strongly inhibited by Fruitflow�. The area under the aggregation curve (AUC) was significantly decreased by 36% from 55622 to 35511. The maximal percent aggregation (max % aggr.) was significantly decreased by 35% from 101% to 66% in the presence of Fruitflow�" "Conclusion Fruitflow� inhibits the platelet activity induced by PM present in air pollution. Moreover, Fruitflow� also inhibits the ADP induced platelet aggregation when promoted by the presence of PM. Thus, Fruitflow� reduces the platelet activation induced by PM which promote arterial thrombosis, atherosclerosis, and other cardiovascular diseases. Fruitflow� may be particularly useful in case of already elevated platelet reactivity due to stress. Furthermore, the WTSE can be used in persons with a preexisting disease such as diabetes or cardiovascular disease as the platelet reactivity which is increased by natural platelet agonist released under stress conditions and disease such as ADP are further promoted by air pollutants such as PM and can be inhibited by Fruitflow� such reducing the risk of cardiovascular events induced by PM. In conclusion, Fruitflow� is able to reduce the deleterious effects of PM on the cardiovascular system."

I can only surmise that you are a bit upset that SiS is a success. Get over it. You've met someone many times, yet he can't associate your views with anyone he knows. You clearly left a big impression there. SiS needed to raise big growth funding, easily done with insti's, but not possible under PXS/SiS umbrella. Blindingly obvious.