Member Info for Albinio74

There will be no honesty - just endless and meaningless negative one line drivel. The posting history is laughable - literally the same soundbites over and over and over across the same few boards.

Bluejay is just a really good case study for TBS. The more things go well for them the more viable Alba's TBS will seem. There could not be a better comparison. I don't think they have been over impressed by the Align Research article which probably explains the sneers. I struggle to see how they are over valued, the article makes some interesting points but does not appear transparent in terms of how it is presented compared to fairly apparent motives. Alba is a great opportunity with tiny mcap and diverse promising interests and imminent news flow. However plenty of hoops and hurdles lie ahead so i would not put all my eggs in this basket. I want to get to 2.5m shares but will be lucky to get to 1.5-1.75 at the rate i am going as also have other shares i like, but this is my favourite.

Cofe it is a BB - anyone can concoct any old story - whether it is their investing successes, how invested they are here or about their job (always find it odd when people really want you to know they are an accountant or serve in the army - clearly wanting to make their comments seem more trustworthy or credible). You often mention religion for example, could be totally genuine, but could also be a way of making yourself seem more genuine/trusted. I do not factor that into anything you may type that relates to Alba - none of us have ever met (as far as I know) so should take any chat here with a bag of salt. If Alba start to gather more interest then the posts will swell here and some will be tosh, some will be genuine but misguided, some will be bang on the money and interesting and some will be laced with manipulative intent (either way). I trust myself usually to see through the dodgy stuff (to be fair i more or less assume everyone is up to something) and certainly don't (knowingly) buy or sell on others comments here.

Alba seem to be getting better at promoting their assets Check out @AlbaMinerals�s Tweet: https://twitter.com/AlbaMinerals/status/981111676987682816?s=09 Check out @AlbaMinerals�s Tweet: https://twitter.com/AlbaMinerals/status/981165540537384961?s=09

Is there any published info on why they overlooked TBS. I can't find any specific info on this. I had assumed that they could not commit to more licences (Greenland govt require a yearly expenditure in exploration licences - i guess to stop anyone sitting on licences that could be developed) so they cherry picked their Dundas Ilmenite project presumably based on proximity to existing infrastructure, which looking through varying info seems the only significant difference between the 2 licenses (i would not claim to be an expert) Keen to see Bluejay's feasability report - must be due soon.

To be fair, they have said that basically Alba is undervalued and maybe Bluejay over valued. Actually not sure Bluejay (annoying you can't really abbreviate their name) are over valued but I am invested in Alba as i beleive they are undervalued. As one of the quieter boards most of the chat here has been decent but if Alba starts to fullfill potential it will get busier with all the nonsense that goes with it - happy to take that if it means the SP goes up.

Actually 5 8s' has converted me - it is impossible for a company to succeed if they have not in the past - there are no examples of this. It is impossible to find gold or other resources of value. They do not exist - massive conspiracy it turns out, all manufactured in the same lab in the USA based on alien tech and selectively deposited around the world by corrupt governments. Newmont are obviously in on this and don't even know who GGP are.

I'll never quite grasp your position Special "bottom of the barrel always has been imo" v your October posts just seems so odd, let alone the jarring balance sheet comments you made. Honestly have no idea if genuine, have some agenda or just like rattling the cages. Anyway moving on there is opportunity here, whether you believe purely hot air / hype driven or that there maybe some serious value in one or two of those licences. Agree lots of opportunities about with easier to gauge potential - i like Beximco, Amerisur and Bango - think burford got a good mention in IC recently.

They had 26m last August no idea if still the same.

Thought Starvest had a decent size holding perhaps sold them off though.

That's right i remember special - the accountant no less that gave a ringing endorsement of the balance sheet in October, but for some reason a few months later thought the very same balance sheet (bar a few million quid extra added from warrant conversions etc) was now awful. But then later clarified it was not the balance sheet that was the issue but the timing of the conversions, the sort of thing you would expect to confuse an accountant. Do agree that SAT are worth a look though (noticed you on that board a while back).

Right, so number of shares in circulation irrelevant. The company 12 years ago was worth 1.3m then? before NM walked the company was worth over 50m and now about 18m i think. An investor can look at the company track record, current prospects/newsflow, current SP and mcap to work out if they want to buy and if current sp is good value to them. Circumstances and management can change over time. What you are saying is the increase in shares over 12 years is the concern. I am not sure I would consider it a major factor when deciding on investing but fair enough if you decided not to invest based on that. Many companies have to raise funds many times before they make a profit. Bio-pharma companies being a good example and of course exploration companies. Until they prove up a licence and sell, JV or become a miner themselves they either pass round the hat and dilute to survive or go bankrupt - all the time invetsors have a choice. I accept entirely ggp could end up out of cash having never got a licence to a commercial conclusion. But equally feel there is still decent chance of a good return here - we'll see through this summer. I certainly won't be here in 12 years waiting for news on current licenses. In my opening post that you claimed was not balanced i acknowledged the poor company track record, high risk nature of exploration, un-answered questions following NM walking, potential ott comments from GH etc. Really not sure where you are going with your randon grabs at negative only slants on things. Did you want to clarify your suggestion that NM's involvement may have been entirely fabricated by GGP.

Not sure on the relevance of the number of shares in circulation? Fair enough to be sceptical about warrants and options close to bad news ( no issues generally at peak prices as makes sense to hedge bets when the outcome is uncertain) But then yet again you totally undermine anything worth thinking about in your post by saying silly things like were NM ever there, is if they would let GGP get away with that. Clearly not balanced at all - demonstrating my post perfectly, thank you.

Just a big con or the best multi bagger on AIM. Would be nice for some sensible comments. Just a big con? Well NM were involved and assessed EG over quite a prolonged period. They are a very large reputable company. Seems unlikely they would allow GGP to misrepresent what they may have found or said to them. It is nonsense to suggest they buy every interesting licence they come across. Also stupid to suggest them walking away means nothing of interest there. GGP have multiple licences/interests and some of those appear to have potential. GGP do have �4m to explore these licences. They do have extra info provided by NM's work at EG. Sure thing to multi bag? �4m can be worked through pretty quickly. Exploration is very high risk - even if soemthing significant is found multiple factors can stop it being commercial. Company track record is not great. There will be investor scepticism after NM walking which may hinder SP upward movement. Seems unlikely NM will come back on EG - with no arrangement in place leaves the assett wide open to others (why would they not look to secure future access to EG), Lots of questions left un-answered, a feeling GH over ramped the situation (find of the decade etc) which is understandable. All in all enough here in my opinion to remain invested, but the future is far from certain and can see why some feel angst over how things played out. Why some insist on posting ott multi bag comments or endless nasty negative drivel it is hard to understand - no idea if they think they are able to effect the situation to be in line with there investment agenda or if they are just mentally unhinged - either way it is tedious and makes these boards a lot less interesting/useful than they could be.

Seems improbable rather than impossible (circumstances can change) but take your point. I am an Alba holder and possible not too distant future Bluejay share holder. Does anyone here have info on why Bluejay chose to overlook the TBS licence as all i read seems very promising there and would have complimented their current interests. Was it just a case of funds and focus and choosing what they perceived as most attractive or is there a specific reason cited that made TBS a no go in their view. A while back read something about walrus breeding grounds but think that was shown to not really be a major concern.

That is a good article on Bluejay and shows how promising Alba's TBS licence is while giving a reasonable understanding of the funding and timescales required to get there. Won't happen overnight but potential to add substantial value to SP in the coming years.

I use IG and they seem to have it at 0.405 - interesting to see where this goes next week - i have no idea, also one eye on the 13th April then, that could be quite an eventful day for the SP........

The new shares are not on AIM until 13th April - so what is going on today in the trades (as always some could be logged incorrectly) is just the reaction to the news as I see it - or have I misunderstood something? "Application will be made for the new ordinary shares to be admitted to trading on AIM ("Admission"). It is expected that Admission will become effective at 8.00 a.m. on or around 13 April 2018"

his comments seem a bit desperate don't they - why does he bother.............

Some pretty chunky buys seem to have gone through already today. Maybe i will become obsessed with daily trading activity after all.