Member Info for Alan2017

And Willow1990 has joined WillowPillow in no longer being a member.......spooky.

E-Al - managed to lock myself out of the previous twitter account....hoping the Chinese can help me lol

So the plan has changed....loooong sigh. 4 months to plan it and submit paperwork to HSE / OGA...and then they change it as it "makes more sense"......then why didn't they do that in the first place? Seems like poor rudder control.

So building the roof before the foundations are in.....

The key event is not the amount of metal you can perforate, but isolating the water zone. The tweet is ambiguous when it comes to have they done any logging for the water zone......

Bumblebee1 - erm does that mean i get 2 million shares then? Sigh

Sadly I can't work for Angus as I've never sidetracked from the wrong well lol

I see there was a multitude of posts that were unnecessary as Angus tweet was self explanatory regarding the perforating operations....sometimes its better to reread something instead of posting multiple posts.

With respect to Brockham / Balcombe information....I'm not going to keep retyping information that can already be found.

Click on this link and you can read all my posts....you don't need to go far back to get the information you seek

http://www.lse.co.uk/member-info.asp?nick=Alan2017

Willow1990 - strange, but I remember a poster called WillowPillow who clogged up this board and was a huge UKOG fan.....do you remember that poster?

JS490 - Holmswood has been a disaster and is several years away from even drilling an exploration well.

11 years wasted trying to get a site in a conservation area passed through the various authorities when they should have looked elsewhere.

It was a poor decision by Angus to enter into a working partnership and sell £2million worth of placement shares to a private investor.

Sam / Baits - the photos are inconclusive as it doesn't show the rest of the site (regarding set up / equipment on site) or maybe that is a deliberate ploy.

Regarding what I have seen up until now I still stick to my operations sequence. It would appear they are carrying out multiple perforation runs rather than just one extremely long string.

The photos show the e-line in tension (meaning its in use). There is a flow line (large black horizontal hose) which is connected from the top of the annular (round red item just below the rig floor platform deck). The flow line takes any fluid returns to a tank. This is set up for well control purposes, but also for when you run pipe (such as perforation guns) into the well as the metal displaces fluid which needs to be stored somewhere on surface until you pull the peroration guns out and then restore the fluid to the well.

I'm still sticking to my timetable of commencing rigging down the rig on Monday (if the Easter holidays don't impact upon Angus).

Harts - if the bridge plug has done its job, then you won’t see the additional pressure caused by the water as it is now isolated. This will be seen on the gauges attached to the well.

DoneK - got it in one

DoneK - no chance.

Bladesharp - very true about potential Easter holidays

E-AL - Brockham has taken almost as long as Brexit....follow Good Oilfield Practices and surprise surprise you generally get a good well. Normally it’s just the results you have to focus on. As I said previously I’ll repost my previous posts once we get confirmation from Angus.

As I said previously, plug set I would say on Saturday. Angus wanted confirmation before calling off the peroration guns which couldbt be delivered until Monday morning. Per flight guns made up today and most likely run in hole tomorrow due to working hours. Perforate. Rig up and run completion string. Commence rigging down rig equipment next Monday.

Well my timetable is going to plan. I’d say start rigging down the rig next Monday. All the best folks.

Only tankers next week will be waste tankers.......

Just had time to review the Angus Twitter photos and I noted the E-line / slickline PCE has been made up and ready to be picked up and made up to the Rig BOPS. That photo was taken on Tuesday 9th April, so the logging has been completed and I would say we should expect a RNS (I believe the installation is significant enough to warrant a true market update) / tweet very shortly to state the isolation plug has been installed.

I wish all genuine Angus investors the very best.

https://twitter.com/Alan20171717/status/1117260527271436288

Post from 4th March 2019

“Scallywag - to be fair to Angus if the water zone is right at the very bottom of the well then the Ultrawave Tool sensors would not have logged this section due to the sensor offset (distance from the drill bit back to where the tool is positioned in the drilling assembly....may be 30-80ft behind.”

I would say due to the profile / angle of the well that the water zone is at the very bottom of the perforations (deepest part of the well), as that tends to be the case as Oil and Gas is lighter than water. In simplistic terms all you need to do is run a bridge plug and squeeze some cement.

So that means you only lose maximum of 80ft out of 656ft of perforations.

Previous post;

https://www.peloton.com/products/wellview/data-analysis/#group-23

You can see in the above link in this scenario the bridge plug (black and yellow triangles) is postioned above the lower perforations (red spikes denote perforations). Above the bridge plug is a small cement plug (grey) to act as the 2nd barrier to the bridge plug (2 barrier plug is required hence HSE involvement). So substitute the lower perforations and replace it with a water zone. That is what you see in the Angus well schematic with the production tubing (blue) positioned above your perforations with a production packer to isolate the rest of the well.

http://www.angusenergy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Angus-BROCKHAM-WORK-PROGRAMME.pdf

I posted this link before, but this is how you would isolate the water zone at the bottom of the well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yklTlzh7FU

Carrying out slickline runs(s) will pinpoint the zone that requires to be sealed off using packer. Resistivity tool can determine whether its oil, water or gas. These measured depths from surface are required so the packer is positioned and set at the correct depths.

In the following link, scroll down to the very last chart and you will see the middle column in the header saying Resistivity. You can see how as you move deeper in the well how the resistivity curve changes when it encounters oil, water or gas. This is how Angus will pinpoint the water zone.

https://www.spec2000.net/14-contacts.htm

You only need a bridge plug smaller than a person. The easiest way to think of it is picture a bath full of water with a plug in…..the plug is there to stop the water draining away.

Now turn the bath upside down. The bath is still full of water and the plug is now at the top. This is the oil reservoir scenario with the Bridge Plug (bath plug) stopping the water from entering the well Angus drilled.

Annular bag with a double ram below it makes up this rigs BOP. Well control if they have to seal the well from a kick situation

Wl1516 - thanks for the post. Where did you get that info from?