Member Info for Alan2017

I have gone through old posts and compiled a summary. Sadly I had done this before, but the thread was removed due to a Troll or somebody who doesn’t want Angus to succeed….sigh.

The well has been drilled and just needs the correct completion equipment / isolation packer(s), as well as well testing equipment, rig and OGA / EA sign off on the final equipment which will be run in hole (well schematic) which needs to include ODs / IDs of the production tubing, ODs / IDs of the completion assemblies and their setting depths.

Something similar to this:

https://www.peloton.com/products/wellview/data-analysis/#group-23

You can see in the above link in this scenario the bridge plug (black and yellow triangles) is postioned above the lower perforations (red spikes denote perforations). Above the bridge plug is a small cement plug (grey) to act as the 2nd barrier to the bridge plug (2 barrier plug is required hence HSE involvement). So substitute the lower perforations and replace it with a water zone. That is what you see in the Angus well schematic with the production tubing (blue) positioned above your perforations with a production packer to isolate the rest of the well.

http://www.angusenergy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Angus-BROCKHAM-WORK-PROGRAMME.pdf

I would say due to the profile / angle of the well that the water zone is at the bottom of the perforations (deepest part of the well), as that tends to be the case as Oil and Gas is lighter than water. In simplistic terms all you need to do is run a bridge plug and squeeze some cement.

I posted this link before, but this is how you would isolate the water zone at the bottom of the well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yklTlzh7FU

Carrying out slickline runs(s) will pinpoint the zone that requires to be sealed off using packer. Resistivity tool can determine whether its oil, water or gas. These measured depths from surface are required so the packer is positioned and set at the correct depths.

In the following link, scroll down to the very last chart and you will see the middle column in the header saying Resistivity. You can see how as you move deeper in the well how the resistivity curve changes when it encounters oil, water or gas. This is how Angus will pinpoint the water zone.

https://www.spec2000.net/14-contacts.htm

You only need a bridge plug smaller than a person. The easiest way to think of it is picture a bath full of water with a plug in…..the plug is there to stop the water draining away.

Now turn the bath upside down. The bath is still full of water and the plug is now at the top. This is the oil reservoir scenario with the Bridge Plug (bath plug) stopping the water from entering the well Angus drilled.

B2HS2L - Brockham is nothing like the self induced problems at BB.

Please look at my 2 posts on 14th March 2019, subject title "RE: RNS"

http://www.lse.co.uk/member-info.asp?nick=Alan2017&page=4

Scarlett - I'll give you a hint...don't look at the tool in the photos, but the packaging...especially the tear. It's the same. Sigh.

I already answered your shorting point, but sadly you started a new thread for some reason.....

So you're aware of no back up at Lidsey and at Brockham before Christmas....glad to see that

Scarlet - funny enough I was accused of working for Angus 2 months ago...I guess it depends o the individual posters agenda.

I note you still can't tell the difference between the 2 photos of the isolation plugs....very telling.

Well all my time lines, problems at Brockham, future operations to correct maters have been correct...but you have only just joined the Angus board recently so you would not be up to speed with that.

Scarlet - who is talking about the past? March 19th tweet clearly states "Unwrapping the water isolation plugs from the USA" So why didn't they post both...or did they think they could just change the camera angle? lol

Spot the difference competition could be a tough one this week...lol

https://twitter.com/JonathanTidswe1/status/1107916096907214849

Looong sigh....if you review my posts then that negates your post as well.

Scarlet - and Shell / BP would never post photos of equipment in the first place. They would have it as a contingency and would have used it in December with no shit down and no harm to the SP...well you did ask sigh

Scarlet - yet they immediately put out a tweet to counter a few twitter posts stating the Tidswell account was fake....so that negates your previous post don’t you think https://twitter.com/angusenergyplc/status/1093866578964373505?s=20

Scarlett - why don’t you ask Angus for a photo of the back up tool. No use saying “isolation plugs” then post 2 photos of the same isolation plug. So why haven’t they posted it then Scarlet? Sigh

rxdav - I already addressed that in my 09:54 post

Kensington - appreciate you going to the AGM and giving us feedback. Well looks like what I’ve been saying is correct....again. Not bad for being on the outside and not having confidential information lol *Water isolation will take no more than 10 days to fix, so expect oil flowing by end of April or early May”.....I said 14 days and said earliest late April / early May *If first well at Brockham is a success then they plan to do 2 horizontal sidetracks, this is cheap and quick compared to drilling a completely new well.” Spooky....said the same thing with 14-21 days per well using existing well subsurface infrastructure....BRX3 (water injector well is the first one to drill). *Balcombe work plan application will be submitted soon, Brockham first then Balcombe. But once Balcombe starts they will have both Balcombe and Brockham running.” Really spooky ....said this back in January. As I’ve said before Balcombe is the jewel in the crown for Angus followed by Brockham. Having both wells being tested and / or drilling operations simultaneously will be a big boost to investor confidence and intern the SP.

Scarlett - I asked Angus to simply post the photo of the back up plug (this is after Tidswell had posted unwrapping isolation plugs, yet posted 2 photos of the same plug)....sigh. Up to now they haven’t...no photo = no back up plug. Yet Angus can tweet immediately to say Tidswell twitter account is genuine https://twitter.com/angusenergyplc/status/1093866578964373505?s=20

Realanaylst - I’d hate to see your reaction to waiting for a DFS sofa offer. The SP is where it is as that’s how the market have priced it due to current activity / production. I would like to think that once the trucks start rolling in then the SP will rise...similar to the rise in June / July 2017. Actual testing and ongoing results are the only thing that will push the SP up. You do need some patience as your posts have a common thread.

bfc - again.....what has changed from what you posted last year?

bfc1 - 13th October 2018 post titled "SP set to Rocket !!"

"During next 3 - 4 weeks should see final pieces put together (according to well respected poster alan2017) to put the SP where it was last year , and maybe surpass last years high.... Well looking at chart for last year ..on June 14th SP was 9.88 and WOW !! By 24 the July 32p'

Well what has changed? Nothing.....insert an isolation plug and carry on with Plan A.....so what you wrote last year still stands.

Mirasol - if there is a pice of oilfield equipment to isolate the water zone...then it means that it's a common occurrence. And i said I have run it more than Weladoilers have posted a negative post against Angus...then that will tell you that its lot lol

*Brockahm drilled in January 2017

Lofty - BFC post was in 2018 talking about the previous year

And bfc is correct in what he wrote regarding the dramatic rise. Angus was stuck in a 9p rut after the swampy propaganda. News was building about permission to drill the Lidsey well (which for me was always a sideshow) and PIs were expecting to be testing Brockham after it was drilled in January 2018 (sadly Tidswell doesn't know his left from his right which resulted in a 2 year wait....very long sigh).

The SP rose on the 11th June 2017 from 10.5p to 32.6p on 16th July 2017.

So what has changed....the excitement for testing Brockham (which I am sure most investors from that time would say it was why they bought Angus) and on top of that we have acquired a 25% stake in Balcombe which has a well drilled, cased off with slotted liner and is ready to have an EWT carried out I would say this year as well.

2 wells simultaneously having EWTS carried out in 2019 is a massive.
Balcombe 7 day test had to have rates of 3,000bopd cut back due to slugging which is an easy fix (requires larger separator on surface and production tubing).

Brockham I have always given a conservative figure of 1,000bopd using HH 2016 test and updated with 2018 results (I will repost my original far more detailed post once we have confirmation of the start date).

bfc1 - 13th October 2018 post titled "SP set to Rocket !!"

"During next 3 - 4 weeks should see final pieces put together (according to well respected poster alan2017) to put the SP where it was last year , and maybe surpass last years high.... Well looking at chart for last year ..on June 14th SP was 9.88 and WOW !! By 24 the July 32p'

Well what has changed? Nothing.....insert an isolation plug and carry on with Plan A.....so what you wrote last year still stands.

You can check out his other posts here to get a feel for his posting history.

http://www.lse.co.uk/member-info.asp?nick=bfc1&page=1

Bfc - what’s a “doggy” well? Never heard that expression before. I’m surprised you didn’t use UKOG BB well as a great example of how not to drill a well and the subsequent SP crash....sigh. Isolating the water zone is an easy fix if the proper procedures are followed.

Did anyone attending the AGM find out if we have a back up bridge plug / isolation plug?

Loot - Tidswell didn't tell the Angus BOD about his intentions ...hence why he is not returning to the BOD. That says it all.