Member Info for Alan2017

Pboo - I suggest you read the RNSs issued “We will now analyse the results with our partners before proceeding to the next stage which would involve bringing on site full well testing equipment and commencing flow tests.” http://www.angusenergy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Angus-Energy-Brockham-Operations-Update.pdf

Pboo - need to order the package first before it’s in place. Hence the post.

I wanted to wait until the water zone was isolated....but I will now repost a post from many moons ago.

Personally I have used the rate of 1,000bopd for expected flow rates during the commercial production test at Brockham. Set yourself a benchmark and then anything above it is a bonus. I've used 1,000bopd in reflection of what HH saw just from the Upper and Lower Kim layer tests in 2016.

It bodes well for an Angus SP rerate, as we are about to test the same formation that has been flowing 5miles down the road as the crow flies, as well as the interbedded shale. A highly deviated well sees more of the limestone than a less deviated well...trigonometry.

The added bonus is that Brockham was drilled specifically as a Kimmeridge producer with the correct hole size / drilling fluid, whereas HH wasn't due to it being an exploration well assessing multiple zones of interest.

That's a very interesting point as I've based my production rates solely on the HH 2016 test and not a standard production well with the correct sized hole and not including the additional hydrocarbons in the interbedded shale, so Brockham should see better flow rates than the HH 2016 test

Brockam isn't a horizontal well, so I will go for a conservative figure of 1,000bopd flow rates.

UKOG (actually Angus did it for them) flow tested their deviated well in both the Upper and Lower Kimmeridge back in 2016

Upper Kim KL4 perforated 88ft observing 901bopd
Lower Kim KL3 perforated 80ft observing 464bopd

So they perforated 168ft and observed 1,365bopd

Now fast forward to 2018 results from 30 days flow test:

Lower Kim KL3 perforated 83ft observing 342bopd (464bopd in 2016. So that’s a 26% decrease.

If we apply the same 26% decrease to the Upper Kim KL4.
Upper Kim KL4 perforated 88ft observing 901bopd in 2016 (estimate 667bopd using 26% decrease rate).

Add 342 + 667 and that gives you 1,009bopd from solely the 2 Limestone beds. Thats not including the fractured interconnected shale that acts like the pipework for the hydrocarbons. Not bad hey!!

Angus are perforating 200m or 656ft of Kimmeridge.
That is 4 times what UKOG did.”

Vonk says at 6min 44secs
“Brockham is a carbon copy of HH. Brockham is drilled as a Kimmeridge Producer. HH was never drilled as a Kimmeridge producer. Hole is too big and used the wrong drilling fluid to get the best out of the reservoir”

http://www.lse.co.uk/media/exclusive-balcombe-test-boost-for-angus-energy-as-oil-flows.html

What is the difference between Brockham and HH?

Brockham is highly deviated with more exposure where as HH isn’t.
Brockham was drilled as a Kimmeridge producer with the correct sized hole for optimum production. HH drilled through Kimmeridge section with much larger hole due to well design assessing deeper reservoirs beneath it.
Brockham drilled with correct drilling fluid for producing from Kimmeridge. HH used wrong drilling fluid as deeper reservoir

I would say we lost max 1

So the water zone has been isolated which for Angus is a great achievement and for us patient PI's fantastic news. I don't think folk really appreciate how this could have affected us if it hadn't.

Regarding the RNS and rushed tweets...well there is a lot of waffle and key information missing.

So the taking time to analyse data......there is nothing to analyse as the well test string has been run and I assume the packer set...so the depths can't change now. Its a matter of turning on the taps lol and seeing what they get. So are they making themselves sound intelligent or are they delaying the ordering / arrival of the well test equipment?

In all the RNS / Tweets they have not said that the equipment as been ordered and on its way. The timeline had 20 days from the well being suspended and the rig starting to be rigged down.

I really don't know why the RNS / Tweets have not been really promoting the achievements. I would also like more information regarding where the bridge plug was set and what is the total meterage of accessible perforations.

Real Analyst - where does it say flow test equipment there?!?! It can’t be there as it hasn’t been delivered and they haven’t confirmed it’s been ordered. Please don’t post factually incorrect information ...rather like your 1,200psi you quoted from a random Tweet.

Bumblebee - crikey you that feeling when somebody doesn’t like you lol I choose to write when there is something worthwhile to write. I cannot help it if you choose not to read my posts...sigh. The water zone is isolated, the well test string has been run, Christmas tree installed and the rig being rigged down. There is nothing more to say until the well test equipment has been ordered, arrives on site and is rigged up...I do wish folk and bees would follow the timeline.

They didn’t even go into techie speak with the Tweet. Just sloppy....or somebody wants some cheap shares

Not sure what the confusion is? Bridge plug set and they will run the well test string today. You would not be running the test string if the water wasn’t isolated. I don’t know who writes the RNS, but the Angus tweet should have read well isolated rather than reperforations successful. And they are not running the completions. It’s a test string for an EWT. Completion string is run when they go into permanent production. This will be run when the test string is removed after the test.

Pboo - I suggest you look at the well test timeline and when they are going to start flowing the well......need well test equipment first.

Pboo - where did I mention your name?

Heid - all my posts are informative...it all depends if whichever poster in question is invested in Angus or not when they choose to be troublesome shall we say......spoils the brew don't you think?

Production tubing going in is either for the bridge plug or for the test string.

If the post from several days ago was tubing going in then that would be the bridge plug making this the well test string which means the water has been isolated.

If and when the well test tubing string is run the next important hurdle is setting the packer on the test string. Once that is done then following the timetable its ordering the well test equipment.

All the best to genuine Angus investors

Not sure how Teeside helps the Weald?

Nomlunga - money is taxed on the profits over the course of the assets life span and some of it is put in a decommissioning pot. This stays with the asset and the soon to be seller can’t touch it. Otherwise there wouldn’t be any money to do the actual decommissioning

Pboo - is the tubing going in the well followed by another joint of tubing...like when they are running drill pipe in the well? Should be going at 60-90ft/min

Pboo - I'm assuming you used white font to acknowledge my analysis........

Youngba - a cross over assembly is really like an adapter the nyou either have 2 sizes of pipe or in this case you are going from a tubing connection to a drill pipe connection. These subs tend to be 2-3ft in length.

Pboo - that will be the bridge plug being run in the well then.

Just a reminder to all from my previous post

First 20 seconds explains the process.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yklTlzh7FU

The following video shows how the bridge plug will be run and set on tubing or drill pipe with a cross over assembly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVbsEc2N8jw

http://alphaoiltools.com/products/bridge-plugs/model-p-e-h-m-bridge-plug/

E-AL / Neeko - work is due to be finished as schedule on 7th May, but is that at the start of end of the working day and when does the RNS get released?

It all depends if the 2 stages of perforations were for the same depth range. If so then I would say Thursday / Friday for running the bridge plug on tubing (1 day) followed by running the test string and setting the packer (being generous by saying 1 day).

The logging run which will take part before running the bridge plug (if they decide not to run a scraper run....looong sigh) will only take a matter of hours.

Regarding the water...it may be used to clean the rig equipment, used for rig pumps (salt water corrodes) etc....

https://ogauthority.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=29c31fa4b00248418e545d222e57ddaa

https://www.energyvoice.com/oilandgas/north-sea/179209/conocophillips-hands-in-southern-north-sea-decommissioning-plans/

EGDON RESOURCES U.K. LIMITED, TERRAIN ENERGY LIMITED, UNION JACK OIL PLC, WINGAS STORAGE UK LIMITED

Saltfleetbury has 8 surface wells and Theddlethorpe Gas Terminal is being decommissioned