Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
Q, how does your dividend strategy apply to solg? None have been paid.
I've been reluctant to buy into the manipulation argument, but we know the question has been raised by the company. Perhaps in this instance there's something to it?
If I heard him correctly, he unwittingly highlighted an anomaly in Glencore's strategy. He stated they have said they are unwilling to invest in copper at current prices, but that they know it will increase in value. If this is actually the case surely they'd be investing now? Why wait for values to move up? Seems slightly odd thinking, particularly as it relates to new and as yet undeveloped discoveries. I'd have thought now is exactly the right time to buy.
'Don't get carried away'! This from the person who told us the cartels would take over Cascabel and that the country was in a civil war. You've over-exaggerated every single recent event, so it's hardly me who's getting carried away.
Anyway, as I said earlier, it's good you're feeling a bit happier with life.
The Telegraph business section has a very good analysis of the BHP/AAL bid and the perceived coming boom for copper. It argues, convincingly, that the growing M&A activity is being driven entirely by copper and the rush for miners to get their hands on more of the stuff.
If you're in need of cheering up, and one or two people on here most certainly are, this article should do the trick.
Hang on! This can't possibly be right! We've been told no one wants anything to do with Ecuador.
NMM, that wasn't my point, although you're right to raise the question.
My point was that we were told the government wouldn't agree to arbitration outside of the country when they appear to already have done so. Mind you, that's not to say they will agree this time, but at least it's negotiable.
I could have sworn we were told this morning that this was bad news for us. A bit like the referendum result which didn't change anything. On that point I notice none of the doomsters who told us arbitration would be non-negotiable and adjudicated under Ecuadorean law, have said anything about the revelation that the current IPA specifies Chile as the destination for arbitration.
Tesla, do you think I'm wrong? Over the years people have talked endlessly about the blocking power of BHP and how their holding may deter a bidder/jv partner, and the argument had some merit. Are you incapable of seeing how their lack of interest may assist our board, or are you blinded by your own bias?
My eyes are fully open to all options/possible outcomes, yours are not.