Member Info for A_E_Marsh

""A_E_Marsh, you persist in trying to persuade me that I should wait for the outcome of some inquiry or other as to RT's guilt. Why?" Do I, "persist"? When was the last time I "persisted"? Some while ago I think, exactly what I am saying about your comments, almost detached from what is written. Let me assist you. I persist in nothing, I BELIEVE that a man is innocent until proven guilty. You do not. That;s up to you, it is wrong, how many innocent people would be in prisons if they were condemned on the say-so of another man? And yet you talk about North Korean attitudes!! What a joke. Really, there are so many issues in all that. Let's just agree to differ.

"""Yet there still exist those on here who delusionally deny this..."" Plainly you are going on about something that has not been posted here today.

"""Well they have had 10 months and by now it should have been green shoots time."" There are subsidiary elements that have affected the Quindell timetable, but basically that is just what we are in line for, hopefully. It would have been a bit foolish (IMO) to announce a strategy and corporate targets with IM only just in post. The way they are going about it is probably correct given all the events that have befallen Quindell in the past 20 months. The split capital return is a clever way to maintain the psychologically important three digit share price, although hopefully it will prove an un-necessary safety net. My anger is still directed far more at the sleaze-balls who attacked, rather than the people who reacted.

""Let us say QPP sees half of the Escrow £'s and is distributed to shareholders. I shall be pleased with that 5p."" 50pps.

I'm at £1.86 after considerable averaging down! With the consolidation I will need £9.60 to break even before December 2016 and £8.60 from Jan 2017. I could still buy more but don't think I will unless I see a massive opportunity here. (Yes, it is arguable that this IS already a massive opportunity, but there is always another bus about to come along) Last March there was regular chatter here about a "£1 party". To keep in line with corporate changes that will be £150 pps from late December.

Perhaps we are just coming at the same thing from different angles, as there are obvious differences in the meanings of value, cost and worth, but all can be used in the same context.

You appear to be confusing the capital return with the value of the company, hence the comment from GS. They are separate entities.

""And stil implies the shares will be worth 10p after the second payout. Anyone claiming they can accurately predict a share price in early 2017 is almost certainly wrong.

""It's a complete no brainer and I'm surprised that loads of new investors are not loading up given this scenario!" While we can be quite confident events will pan out as the BoD wishes there are no certainties. There will be many who can see bigger returns from other stocks over a shorter period of time. I am hoping for a lot of good news in the near future to bolster the price, but as I say, no certainties. For those of us who have been around longer the concept of the £150 party is a bit of a perspective re-adjustment!

Consolidation theory can differ from consolidation fact, sometimes by a dramatic amount. I am hopeful that there is plenty of good news to come from Quindell to actually increase the price above the current level when the minus 90p, times ten level is implemented. But there are no guarantees, as is virtually always the case in investment.

Will today again open with a small sell as a U/T and a disproportionally large drop in the SP? It has happened for the last two days, why spoil a "good" thing? Does yesterday's shocking blue close provide the opportunity? Shirley Knott.

""0p by christmas"" 1/10th of 0p by Christmas, after consolidation!

""For the capital distribution to take place a COURT and shareholders must first APPROVE . AS OF YET THEY HAVE NOT ."" BUT the BOARD who probably know better than YOU say there should be NO PROBLEM. Therefore the capital return is virtually CERTAIN to happen. As every female ruler from the Middle East will TELL you.

""....AND IS ONGOING in the absence of any new announcements to the contrary .."" Well of course it is!! What do you expect??? They are collecting evidence and may prosecute SOMEBODY. But NOT Quindell. I know that will allay all your fears.

Do they work this out??? Share Price: 97.25 Bid: 98.00 Ask: 98.75 Change: -1.50 (-1.52%) The share price (notably) lower than both bid and ask... AIM.... "All Interested Mates".

Two listed trades (there may be more to be shown ) totalling 1200 see a jump of 2.75 pence. Remarakble.

as happened yesterday, a single U/T (unusual in itself at this time of day) has taken the price down by 2 per cent plus despite no actual trades. Does a single trade sale of 128 shares really represent a drop of 2.53 per cent? I think not. It looks like this is a good time of day to buy. I will be interested to see the price of the first "real" trade as these "professionals" line their pockets. I bet you can't get in at this level, unless you are in the club.

""Send our regards to Daffy Duck."" Any duck I see will be stuffed and served with lashings of ginger beer.

""Just encouraging more GLOBO's then....."" There are two ways of looking at that... Do YOU want to be the one who writes the misleading information now when you know it is you will be taken to court? It puts your personal liability as an official of a company up for examination by the courts. This ruling still says there is responsibility but it (correctly, IMO) lays that responsibility at the feet of the person giving the information, not the company that has employed them. These things are very deep and have massive implications on all sides.

To be fair you are right about the 1/15 here too. I have never recovered my losses. But the potential was there to, I could have done several times over, to be honest, if I'd had my wits about me and the nerve, of course, one does need the nerve. As it is I have managed to reduce them substantially and look forward to more opportunity. But I don't see Quindell as the same as many other dilutions for example, an oil company. The speculative element is much less. Even with little known we do know a fair amount here. Multi award winning software, money in the bank are just two examples, so hopefully, there should be good recovery here. The 1/10 is a clever mechanism to try and maintain the share price while reducing the shares in issue.