Member Info for A_E_Marsh

Tesco is an unchanged business with a well-defined history that stretches back decades as a British Supermarket. Quindell has none of that. Watchstone is a vastly changed company. Effectively shareholders have been compensated and will, in theory get even more. From a post a fair while ago. ""Matters to be taken into consideration in establishing that it is not in the public interest to prosecute a corporate entity "(f) The offending is not recent in nature, ( It isn't, it is historic) and the company in its current form is effectively a different body to that which committed the offences (it is now and most certainly by the time of the conclusion of the investigation) . For example it has been taken over by another company, it no longer operates in the relevant industry or market, (Sold most to S & G) all of the culpable individuals have left or been dismissed, ( Absolutely, brand new BoD) or corporate structures or processes have been changed in such a way as to make a repetition of the offending impossible." (PwC report has enabled that) Would seem highly relevant here. Taken from the CPS guidelines. I'm not answering yes or no to your question, just pointing out that, as is often the case, the circumstances are not comparable when you get to the detail. However, if "yes" is going to make people buy millions of shares and drive the WTG price right up another 2 or even 3p, then OK... "YES". (Do not take my claim seriously. I may be wrong, you can lose money investing on AIM [No, really... you can....] this place is short of experts and even shorter of investment experts.)

the "Ramper" posts then?

""I do not share yours or gumpies optimism or enthusiasm, or any other resident rampers."" Show me ONE post where a "resident ramper" has quoted a high price for WTG. That's the definition of a "ramper", someone who posts (constant) higher prices. There isn't one here, so face facts for once. You however have posted a lower price with absolutely no idea what it will be. To me that qualifies as "trolling". Take less notice of British Bulls, they often get it wrong and turn like the wind.

""I will come back in three months time to remind you. You have no defence as you have tunnel vision. The price will be about 130p."" I'll mark that on my calender. It will be the 21st of June. Two days after the 19th of June. Interesting. But your certainty is certainly mis-placed. Far more realistic to admit it could actually go either way. (You do know the significance of 19th of June, I assume?)

TO SEE SOME GOOD PR COMING FROM WTG FOR A CHANGE! No wonder I'm Marshy! Oh no, that doesn't quite work, does it?

No offence taken or meant. I have been here quite a while and make few comments, mostly of the type you have seen so I know I come across as negative, but I have defended BOOM frequently in the PE days too, you have probably seen that. Just want to make sure RP and Co. don't run away with the wrong idea, I like accountability. Some good buys coming in. (None mine, sadly)

It's also perfectly fair to criticise. Nothing to do with "not getting it". As a critical person I see no reason to make life easy for any one. You should see my bank manager when I want a loan and he also becomes quite critical. Make too many excuses for them and believe me, they will just eat your (and mine) money.

""Something odd here The market cap is now £75m Cash at 31 December was circa £80m"" I'm not condoning it but those of us with longer memories will recall that this is no "odder" then the end of 2015 when the share price was also below the level of money the company held. Yes you could buy shares for 87p that you would get 90p return on. It actually happened then so.... perhaps not that odd. Bonus for the "club".

that somebody found my comments "offensive" and had them removed. Equally interesting that the price has still fallen. I'll say it again, because I see no reson for this to upset anybody. The person who sold yesterday may be the one who made the best decision. They can get out with perhaps a profit and use it, if they wish to (perhaps) but in and get more shares for their money. That upsets anyone?

""Think some PI had enough today holding. 10k sell"" I think some PI had a bit of knowledge that many others didn't. If they got out with a small profit they should be able to buy back in,if they think BOOM is worth it. They may not.

a bit this morning before putting their boot into the groin.

To be fair, you don't know for sure if he is, or is not passing gold bricks. Good point. I just take it for granted he isn't (DOH!)

""I don't know him,nor did or do I take things for granted - "" TBH I bet that's simply not true because we all take things for granted, it's part of the human condition, it's just that you claiming you don't take for granted things you claim I do take for granted. For example, you are taking it for granted that I know nothing about the man, I could be his next door neighbour and we don't get on because of his massive Leylandii! Yes, I take it for granted that a new company needs significant investment. You don't, OK. Yes, I take it for granted (YITIFG) that investment will in many cases come from others. OK you don't. TITIFG he enjoyed a comfortable life-style OK, you don't. I don't see where that leaves us frankly! Neither of us are passing gold bricks. BTW, I have absolutely no problem with you or anyone else reporting posts, that is what the tab is there for. I will try to have a "better" day, thanks for your good wishes. I return them, wishing you a massive rise in BOOM share price. (Oh, what a give away!)

""Better to be polite after yesterday's High Court judgement about allegations on media platforms as a thing published remains on record and can be used to show intent." I would be somewhat ired to suffer any maltreatment for what I have said. I will remind you we should have been told this months ago. A little reaction is perfectly valid. I admit, I did leave out "probably from the final line but it was in the original. There is enough censorship, often only because somebody is saying something somebody else finds uncomfortable, already. You are at liberty to report my post.

""I think most directors who sit on a number of boards have a company or two go bust-"" A company or two, yes, but a long-running succession of failure can never look good. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over but expecting a different result. I will take it for granted he is not insane. I will also take it for granted that although a lot of investors have probably lost money through his, shall we be polite and can them, "efforts"? That although a lot of investors will have lost a good deal of money through his efforts he has enjoyed a comfortable life-style throughout.

I'm glad to see this RNS. Hopefully they're not just below 3 per cent but they've gone, and for good. Now then BoD, how about giving some new investors a reason to buy in?

"" but disagree with the extreme fear which feels like is there:"" I have said I want to see an effort made to change sentiment. OK, call me scared. However I think it is a sensible desire. I am not a naturally patient person and have actually been very long-suffering and understanding where this company is concerned. ""We're still at cash value."" That means very little. As I think we both know there are mechanisms and tools in use, not just digital, that can change prices no matter what the figures say. ""I wager you a pint of decent beer that by close of Friday we're back in the tedium of 180p awaiting news.....still."" I live in Dorset, we don't do decent beer, ask a Northerner. (They think anything with less than two inches of froth on top is "flat". Now we all have to drink inches of froth and are conned out of true pints because of Northerners coming down here on holiday and complaining the beer doesn't "have a head...") Contentious stuff I know, but I've had a bad day!

""......was also advised the nms was 50000.""" If that is the case then the figures on this page as indicated by LSE are incorrect. They clearly state a market size of 100,000. Still, who can we trust in this world? ATB.

""Begs the question of why are mms unwilling to quote -which is their prerogative,-are they holding with expectations?"" I notice you referring to a purchase of 104,000 shares. However if you had asked for slightly less perhaps ther would have been no problem? The market size is shown as 100,000. I was under the impression that they are contractually obliged to process deals for anything up to that size.

"".. looks like peak got barred too...."" Still showing as a member, check "peak54" although not posted since before Christmas.