Member Info for A_E_Marsh

""- not too sure of the significance of this -"" They achieve the rounding down of my shares (AGAIN), although at least this time they only get one of them off me!

to be getting some action now.

""Can sleep now :)"" Lol. Good one......

Their web-site is down and their customer service closed for the ENTIRE WEEK-END. Final straw, I was asked to answer a survey telling them how satisfied I was with the service!! I told them. I have a feeling the results of this week-ends survey are destined for the recycle bin.

""Come on AEM :)"" Oh, if it makes you happy. ""Maybe selling 600,000 dropped the share price.""" Yeah, maybe it did. "" Once filled price recovers. "" Could be. Of course there are alternative possibilities, but that is a perfectly valid one..... I hope that helped.

Greetings GPLZ and HH (GS, bass, CM etc...) Holding on here, despite the noise, smoke and bombs all around... when does fireworks month end? 11th November hopefully!! Dear God, Please can we have more rain? Amen. On the 10th I'm off to the dentist... don't anybody tell me I don't know how to celebrate. Good luck to all genuine holders and posters.

Some people just come here to waste the time of others. Prime example: """....why have they now decided to issue in two tranches?""" Good answer (IMO) Why haven't you read the RNS?

"""Another big sale at the end .."" Quick reminder, just to provide balance, I'm afraid. ""*Buys and Sells are calculated on the difference between the trade price and the current mid price. As such, they can occasionally be incorrect."" That sell could well have been a buy and judging by the price movement at the end it seems it was.

"""Another big sale at the end .."" Quick reminder, just to provide balance, I'm afraid. ""*Buys and Sells are calculated on the difference between the trade price and the current mid price. As such, they can occasionally be incorrect."" That sell could well have been a buy and judging by the price movement at the end it seems it was.

Was that 600,000 sell (if it was a sell) the same shares that were bought yesterday in two blocks of 300,000? Either way if it was a sell, less than five and a half minutes later they could have got another six grand!

We have good cause tonight!!! Very good cause indeed.

""..........and the BoD made some VERY unambiguous statements at the AGM, with our own QC nodding in agreement. No worries over here...business as usual"" Let's hope they keep that well in public view.

""A good barrister will see the opportunity left by RT AND CO..." Are you telling us they are guilty of some crime? Do forgive me, but it does rather seem that way. I will put on record I am happy to await any outcome before pointing a finger of blame at anyone. You on the other hand.....

Lol! Comparing apples and pears. You can decide which is which.

No-one can predict the out come of the investigation, indeed, it is PROBABLY illegal to do so. I have only put up facts as I see them and as they are, people may argue as they wish, against them or in their favour, but it looks pretty strong to me. Shep1, nice speculative post but a bit vague. I see you contradict the CPS guidelines, perhaps you know more? Could you please give an example or two of SFO investigations leading to companies no longer trading but "being persued", I know of none, and it appears at the moment, that nor do you. Am I wrong?

""artlover .....POSSIBLE if not probable SFO fine if past fraud found, what would that be 50 million ? """ There again, a good read, Quindell actually fits most, if not ALL criteria and has taken expert advice re: court hearing. All is OK, I fear. Non-brackets, Legalese, brackets, my comments added. Matters to be taken into consideration in establishing that it is not in the public interest to prosecute a corporate entity "(f) The offending is not recent in nature, ( It isn't, it is historic) and the company in its current form is effectively a different body to that which committed the offences (it is now and most certainly by the time of the conclusion of the investigation) . For example it has been taken over by another company, it no longer operates in the relevant industry or market, (Sold most to S & G) all of the culpable individuals have left or been dismissed, ( Absolutely, brand new BoD) or corporate structures or processes have been changed in such a way as to make a repetition of the offending impossible." (PwC report has enabled that) Would seem highly relevant here. Taken from the CPS guidelines. Legalese I fear anybody expecting a hefty fine is deluding themselves. Very afraid of that.

"""....shares sold in one go late on !""" Don't believe everything you read. We don't know that they weren't a buy...... *Buys and Sells are calculated on the difference between the trade price and the current mid price. As such, they can occasionally be incorrect.

Would we do the same? If it was back-handers and nods and winks, no, I wouldn't. These things catch up with you in the end and I have lost at least one job for refusing to do what everybody else took for granted. That's life. But they are killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. I have enough experience of life to know you always pay in the end... one way or another, it does get you back. Not worth it, IMO. Especially if you are already well set up. But who knows, perhaps it is his reward for good deeds??????? Yeah...... right.... Hopefully, we will all get ours too. Altogether now "Always look on the bright side of life, tee-tum...."

U/T and Share price DO NOT MATCH. How fortunate that the SFO is only checking historical data. Some deeply suspicious action here from the market this afternoon, IMO.

some little darling in the boys club has stolen 300,000 after hours. What a surprise. I hope his security gate falls on his crappy poshe car.