Member Info for 67Sam

MV
"Could you tell us the total number of published scientists from which the percentages figures came, was it 10.100 or 1000?"
Yes, I can. It was based on a review of 11,602 peer-reviewed articles on “climate change” and “global warming” published in the first 7 months of 2019.
I posted a link to the paper earlier, you could have read that yourself in the first paragraph.

"eg Churchill was placed to deal with Hitler "
Creation was a wee bit late (75 Million fatalities) with that one. Bit of early intervention in 1937 might have helped things better.
Also you don't seem to be very spiritual about the planet Chips. Is it all just about human souls? I find the problem with faith is that it becomes an excuse not to do much. If Creation solves everything then where is there any meaning in doing anything?
And what is that turns you on about Nostradamus and not other prophets?

'What is the difference between saying "97% of scientists" and "97% of publishing scientists", other than you arguing for the sake of arguing?'
Because it what separates evidence from opinion.

tant
"Beware who you trust"
Yes I was just thinking that.

published in 2019

https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0270467619886266

MV
"the gist of the point is that the overwhelming majority of scientists agree on something."
No, it isnt. The gist of the point is that 97-99% of actively publishing climate scientists agree human activity is the cause of global warming.
This was a published peer reviewed evidence synthesis in 2016 It is the best evidence we have no matter how you try and corrupt it.

"Is the bloke down the pub Brixton!"
Lol, no I think he's in Spoons talking about clay soil shrinkage

MV
"machiismo
97% of all scientists do not agree that climate change is man-made"

"97-99% of all actively publishing climate scientists" is the correct description in that they agree the earth is warming and human activity is teh main cause of that.
Mind you, theres a bloke down the pub saying it's all made up.
I 'd better have a think about who is worth listening to....

MV
"Do you have a problem with bringing in religious awareness? it would be very interesting to see certain religions sit down and talk about their sub-conscience biases."
No. You can see that from my replies. I do have a problem knowing when to take you seriously, as I don't always think you do mean what you write. On this issue we seem to agree then. And age yes, as I said general equalities training would cover all protected characteristics.
"But we know that will never happen don't we and why it will never happen."
Um, No. I dont know. What makes you so emphatic to say never?

"Hell of an escape, running like that while his intestines are hanging out."
Sean Pertwee I mean, not Hardup.

"Dog soldiers film on 4 is good"

Hell of an escape, running like that while his intestines are hanging out.

Brixton
"Hardup is an attention seeker "
Hard grafter with a canny eye for a bargain.
At least thats how I imagine him.

"Brixton you had four for your anticipation of a remake of Zulu which was quite a funny pushback"
It was MV post not yours. He also made me laugh bonce by announcing Carrie Johnson as Princess Nut Nuts. I suppose thats the extent of our shared prejudice, wives of Tory PM's.

Brixton
"MV
Gets a tremendous amount of recommends. 2 x 7 on this chat"
Hardup gets more than that every day for the buyback update. He hit 20 once, as I recall.
MV attracts like minded people, plus there are a few here that like to have a go at Mach. So I expect thats nearly seven in total.

"MV
Gets a tremendous amount of recommends. 2 x 7 on this chat"
Brixton you had four for your anticipation of a remake of Zulu which was quite a funny pushback.
The original film has a contested storyline because it doesn't portray the British as the aggressors. But it contains amazing photography and portrays a sense of dread without actually showing any blood or guts. I think of it as a classic of its time.

MV

"67sam
I always mean what I write"

" lets's bring in religious awareness"

MV
"You are clueless"
No. I just have a different mindset to you. You tend to be intolerant and judgemental of others views. I quite enjoy understanding differences without feeling assaulted by it. I don't feel compelled to rubbish someone just because they don't agree with me.

MV
"persecuted for none racial awareness failings"
It isn't until behaviour actually incites racial hatred that it becomes unlawful. No-ones policing your thoughts; just your actions and your words.

MV
"I have never come across a none white being persecuted for none racial awareness failings"

"Similar profiles are evident from analysis of the British Crime Survey (reported in Sibbitt, 1997), where for hate crimes against African Caribbean victims:
• 82% of offenders were described as white;
For Asian victims where a perceived racial motivation was recorded:
• 82% of offenders were white"

Then who are the 18%?