Member Info for 13thmonkey

Chippyjo, over on the ITM board someone had noted that people were queuing 5 deep for chargers, if they put more chargers in that's 5 times the instantaneous load. E momentum us growing quickly.

Risky, is it worth the risk that the post go un-countered? Or do we just every day put a post countering the repetitive ****e and the ignore him?

You have previously categorically stated that the supply can cope, it cannot, others are aware of this too. I see you chopped out the supplementary nature of the demand. Well done for picking through posts. 720kWhx1 or 72kWh x10? i.e. 10 teslas, the load is the same. If the unit provides power for 1/3 of them, it reduces the load on the grid, and that's the product they are saying is ready Dec 2019. And those 720kWh trucks don't exist here yet.
You really need to try harder.

I see you still haven't told us who is talking about MW of capacity in the near term...

There are some interesting discussions over on ITM about the networks capability to cope with charging, specifically in this case Nikola's high capacity battery trucks, 720kWh jobbies. The consensus is that the grid could not cope if they were to be charged in a reasonable time frame. They are using this as evidence of the need to jump to H2 (they are a source) and not battery, to me it tells of the need for grid supplementation.

To those on the fence, there are refutations at the head of this thread to many points brought up in the 'counter narrative' , read, ask questions, research elsewhere you know what you should do. There are refutations elsewhere to the CWR counter narrative too, or at least some points that highlight the flaws, missing information and poor logic in those arguments.

Didn't he also say he was going to the open day? Tbh I treat him like the class simpleton.

What did Jim do now?

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/PPS/order-from-fincantieri-5uxpwr5kzvt3ace.html The previous ferry is referred to as well, not too impressed with it not being use any more but it ran for a good while.

And it's not always the bulk capacity that's a problem, but the ability to get it to where it needs to be.

really? Looking at the longer period chart for CWR it's flat and SP is essentially the same as before the consolidation. Unless i'm missing something.

Pps had a fc on a ferry and now has sold one for testing on another vessel.

There is a strong argument for not existing in an echo chamber (irony not intended), and he has challenged us, whilst accusing us of thinking in ways that we don't actually think, no-one here expects profits soon, we just expect a slowly improving shareprice. It's useful, if a little annoying.

The Rover?? There's still unleaded available even now, there will be exceptions.

25million share dilution worst case, i.e. still at 20p, and if we're at 20p in 4 years time it's gone tits up anyway. As you pointed out the number of shares issued, this is a dilution on an irrelevant scale.

I'm thinking he can't, the long game sits with II's getting more involved, and it might be very long, so all he's going to do is put off some PI's or turn some to shorters (and that's only an issue if done in such a way as to actually effect the SP, if that can even be done with this stock). So I believe he can only have an impact at this level, once there is enough involvement from the II's it'll find the level it would have found anyway. LTH's make up your own minds, new people take a balanced view, we've refuted points raised, raising them again doesn't change that.

I'm not sure they can answer this, but what is their expectation on the time from initial contact to signed deal, and from signed deal to delivery, I'm trying to ascertain if clients are coming to them with concepts, or fully funded and thought out needs (or if they even know), and what they think their response times might be.

Mitch, I know ;) , still got the H-word in it though. I'm surprised that red giants haven't been brought up, when stars run out of helium they start on hydrogen and it all goes wrong.

Mitch, was that a H2 explosion?

The research info from lboro is basically asking the question can we model the flame front... which has exactly zero to do with safety, but you just did a keyword search didn't you.

How many oil slicks? how many burnt out drilling rigs? How many exploding refineries? How many exploding petrol stations? how many burnt out cars?

As to Fukushima, hardly a hydrogen accident.

I thought your problem as we were overpriced cf Ceres? Not that FC is inherently impractical? Make up your mind.