Member Info for 13thmonkey

Is that all? What's that a third of the UK population a week?

The covid angle was a nice surprise.

I'm 178 on the avacta listing.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-53061281

Treatment option for covid.

You actually think AB is prevaricating? The market might be.

You actually think AB is prevaricating? The market might be.

I've started using Firefox on my phone with ublock origin as an add-on much better.

It was inevitable, there is literally nothing that could be practically done about it other than prevent all movement until it ran out of hosts, in the long term a vaccine is the only solution, or immunity through survival.

To me that is much greater than £5.

I've always wondered how it would be priced for non recurring profits, from a pe perspective. That all makes sense.

I've put forward that it could be used like that weeks ago in response to allowing the tracking of data so that spread could be monitored, I said it was trivially easy, but I've heard nothing official. But that was weeks ago.

Kingschlong, what sort of yearly profit will be needed to justify a £5 share price, state what pe ratio assumptions you use, and assume a nice round 250m shares just to keep the sums simple. Because sp is really driven by profit and potential, not what seems like a reasonable increase. The reasonable increase model might work where it's roughly steady state, some organic growth, my argument is that this is not where we are, and therefore using an estimate of earnings in a couple of years time is the better way to come up with a share price.

£50 is only 10bn mcap, that doesn't need too much profit to justify, or if you are Uber it requires no profit, and a product that is essentially the use of an app to use a service that someone else already offers. The low share count works massively in our favour

£50 is only a 10bn company, not that unusual, loads of companies hit 10bn, might only need 500m of profit to justify it, £50 is only possible however because they have a lowish number of shares issued. It's an amazing and difficult to believe value, but justifiable. I'll have bricked myself and be at least partially out by then.

Is he actually saying, avacta, it's covid, game soon to be up. As he's gone and caught it and is just letting us know?

My only thought on the director share transaction is that it must mean that they know if no news for a period of time? Isn't there a blackout period regarding news and selling?

The same as h2 or conventional fuel. Only with electric if you aren't moving you are using nothing, AC will use power but with a 50kwh battery you'd probably get 200 hrs out of that so an hour in traffic won't dent it, radio will use a kWh every month, something on that scale, but other cars would need to idle to maintain AC, which is probably their least efficient mode.

Does that apply if the non RNSd content is outside of trading hours? And then the RNS would followup before start of trading?

Greedo 1 week so you were blaming softening prices as being a result of MMs, now your talking about covid no longer being an issue? It's only less of an issue because we've been on lock down, cause and effect.

Chengdo4 if he needs the money tomorrow he's screwed, if he doesn't need it for 5 years different story. Could he have traded? Yes, was it guaranteed to work, no.

To SXX bloke if that's Sirius then the failure of the company is surely the bigger issue?
There is another party, the ease of access to unadvised trading, especially in SIPPs, BBs haven't helped but even having a warning of 'you're investing more than 10% of your funds in one go, are you sure about this?' might make people think twice. I've one share, comparing book to book, above 10% and it's my biggest worry, everything else is 5-10% and there is a good portion in funds. This has minimised risk. Yes it limits returns, but lost returns are less bad than realised risks. But I suppose the moment that they flash a warning like that, it creates a delay (claims of I lost because the price moved whilst answering your question) and it implies advice (you inferred that 10% was safe). So to be truly execution only is the safest way, and people must take responsibility for their own actions. There's a claims industry that's run out of work that's looking for something to do.