Member Info for 13thmonkey

Intimations of a delay perhaps, seems to be a sensible way to progress in the current situation to me.

There's not been a single event so far (planned for 2021), if it takes off as a sport then great, if not then it's nothing. Attaching to formula e would have been better as it already exists.

@task, whilst you can reduce losses by raising voltage, cables will only be rated to a certain voltage, so you still need to replace the cables to put more power through. You might be able to stretch the spec a bit but all of the transformers will be fixed ratio i.e. one voltage to another, and working the cables closer to their limits would only be a tiny increase anyway.

Das, not all cars can do that, a leaf can though.

Jdt, 1-5 dollars, do you have a source for that? That's significantly lower than anything else we've seen.

Taskmaster, it's still Watts and Kwh, regardless of voltage, you've got to make the power somehow.

Sorcerer, it's not unlikely that they'd be able to get the result electronically, the most heath Robinson setup would be a camera sending an image of the test output every day. Given that, there are therefore ways of making it simpler, having a light detector behind the bars on an lfd, as the bars darken the detector trips. You could track the entire country from one control room. Not sure how you replace the equivalent of the strips once triggered.

When will the governing body give an answer? Start of day, end of day?, I imagine they'll give approval in the middle of the day after some kind of review meeting to approve what's being stated in a report recommending that the test is passed or failed. Why would they wait before telling us? At that point why wait for the RNS.

Mikey, let me get this straight, whilst the technical team are working with cytiva to optimise the tests, Al should not be working other opportunities and making deals that will reuse the test in other places? We alu want the big news to land, but this is confirmatory that other people agree that the test is good.

Re CGT allowances, what is the definition of profit here, is it profit over the whole of the account based on purchase Vs sale price within the tax year, or funds removed from the account?

I suggested to them power supplies for containerised scanners as opposed to diesels when I was in touch with the FD #notnamedropping

Now, I know we talk a lot about viruses here, but one of the benefits that avacta has is not having to work around antibiotic patents etc. Does that therefore mean that there is a use case to replace or supplement antibiotics? Does that therefore mean that we have a means to target drug resistance forms of infections? I also recall sepsis being mentioned, which again is bacterial in nature.

Global, to me it sounds like that's a fairly comprehensive list of risks, and none of them are materialising, so I treat it as a positive post to say that there aren't many/any special risks that are unique to the company or that seem to be likely.

Not speaking for him but it is the risk of that happening, it doesn't mean it has happened, just that it is a thing that could happen. Like with fire or flood, it's a risk it could happen, there's no indication that there has been a flood and or a fire.

Yorkshireone, less of a coincidence when you consider that there is obviously a market and if a big company got wind that their competitor was working on something and they thought they had a chance to get there first they might go for it. But it's still close.

What I was reading is that they finance the purchase of the station convert to waste burning at which point they would probably get paid for taking the waste and get paid for the power produced. Or they sell/lease the tech to the current operators and make money that way without having to the finance the plant. Not sure why you're asking the question? I'd be very happy with a 30 to 40m income pa never mind profit.

If your factory is closed because you won't stump up for tests, but your competitors is, then guys what happens? They increase their prices to cover the tests, probably pennies per unit, supply is reduced as there are fewer producers, customers who want the product will pay the slightly increased cost, one company makes a profit, the other doesn't.

How many extra days will this funding last if they curtailed salaries? I'd suggest no more than an additional 10 to 15 days if the rest of it is being used to build and develop.

A different view of viral load Vs infective state. All good.

https://twitter.com/nature/status/1277968892963352578?s=19

I would have preferred a clear at the minimum clinical load and above. I'm giving the benefit of the doubt, he didn't need to say anything at all at that time, so why be disingenuous.