Member Info for 13thmonkey

completely agree that dilution can be mitigated by added value .

Given anti fragiles link to 2015 £10 posts there were 60m shares, now at 130m?. So in today's money that's a £5 share.

To add to that you could sell just some of you are going beyond 20k, and bed and ISA is not a colloquial term, it appears as an option on interactive investors transactions for instance, it's a recognised term.

Talk to your provider, if they don't do ISAs move to one that does, then do it.

Should have expanded, they arrange a sell from trading and a buy in an ISA, the good institutions will recognise that the funds are available and make it instantaneous, the bad ones will take a few days. You could borrow the money and pay a few days of interest to avoid missing the rise.

Bed and ISA before you hit the limit.

I was there in the 20s for an age, but with only a couple of k, and PPS at 5p. All in the sipp unfortunately.

Sensors in toilets, scanners and a qr code on a wrist strap, expand what it tracks to include blood, sugars, other key biological indicators, and then you can track complications, health and such.

needlegun

For the sake of anyone new to shares, this is what someone who is under diversified looks like, with an example of the worry that creates.

I recall this from a few days ago, so I'm assuming this is s new tweet of slightly aged news.
https://twitter.com/HemogenyxPharma/status/1296091111736455168?s=19

Small, why can't Matt h comment on something that isn't CE marked? Being CE marked doesn't mean it can be talked about. They talk about fusion reactors and other things in the future that aren't CE marked.

Why use time consuming PCR? It's like saying that the horse and carriage is a reason that the car would fail.

Yes, fully functional, just checked at 10.39

Logged in through the app a few mins ago, no problem.

'averse' funny.

Pigster, it was less than a back of the fag packet calc, but I still believe that there won't be enough to make the R reduction pointless.

However to keep the R number low enough you can have a degree of 'failure' within the test caused by purposeful misbehaving, I'd suggest that even if 10% try to buck the system then you'd only be letting a small number of people out.

False negatives if not tested. So not a fault of any testing.

Bond has a responsibility to make AFC work. Stop. This may have an impact on reducing reliance on oil, by the tiniest amount. The two are barely related, if AFC had worked 5 years ago, a decade ago, that tanker would still be sailing, and will for at least the next 20 years.