Member Info for 13thmonkey

Great post by the way.
Al did mention that the tests were carried out within the clinical range, which personally I'm interpreting as being across the whole of the range rather than at one end or the other or just the middle of the range, this corresponds to the LOD does it not?

Maybe for 5mins until 667 turns up

Bananaman2 I think it's much worse, you've got the charging spread out over a shift, it'll be a lot more clumpy than that, maybe there being only 4 peaks realistically for a van to anything like 100 miles it'll take 3 hours leading to 3 peaks per shift and not 16 (a flat load scenario), hence it'll be nearer 6 to 7,000 homes. I certainly wouldn't expect any charging in the first or last hour of a shift.
If these were automated and not driven by people you might get away with a bit lower, but not much.

Only if the smaller localised production was as efficient as the larger production systems.

Travel light, my understanding is that you make an affimer that locks onto a protein that are very common in cancers and less common elsewhere, at the other end of the affimer is a drug trust you want to deliver to the tumour.

Antibotics and antibodies are two very different things. Antibiotics specifically target bacteria and are non living themselves, antibodies are cells that the human body first learns to generate and target viruses and bacteria, and then it generates more on demand once the target is present. Vaccines just give the immune system the chance to learn on something that looks like the virus.

I do wonder, a little tongue in cheek, if we'd have been a Chinese company would they have just ordered shedloads anyway.

New York estimated 1 in 5 have been infected, London 1 in 7, Spain and Italy 1 in 20, herd immunity needs more than 2 in 3.

Scarrat do you mean that you don't think people should be tested?

https://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/covid-19-vaccine-could-take-up-to-a-year-and-a-half-to-be-available-if-effective/
That's just available, not available and given to a useful portion of the population. I'd suggest 24 to 30 months minimum (acting on a war footing) to vaccinate enough people that testing becomes less important.

I'd leave it a good 12 months before trusting a vaccine, no issues with vaccines in general, just ones that are rushed through.

What are the PR people to say? We're close to having a test ready? If anything that would distract from actually getting the test ready, and all it would do is influence the short term share price, not the longer term price.

So I guess you'll short it then? It is this just a public service announcement?

Never mind the test, they've got the ruddy cure: https://twitter.com/PypAyurved/status/1275324398665269248?s=20
;)

If there was it wouldn't contain anything we didn't already know unless, by coincidence, that happened to become known to the business at this time.

Pumpky I count 5, including what looks to be the wife of Vlad, so not many, quickdraws post explains something.

This is great news, someone else has opened the market and the demand, and then we turn up cheaper and faster.

I also hit the what's the point in selling phase, there's more benefit in holding and hoping it turns around than in the fraction of my investment that I'd have been able to recover. Glad I made the right call, it's not been that way elsewhere though.

If few enough cheat then it's not really an issue, R will be below 1, you'll get tiny hotspots, track and trace might even uncover them. Even lock down was designed with a less than 100% compliance rate.

The 23m tests per week, for the middle income countries I was half reading that as per country...