Member Info for 13thmonkey

He's still there now.

No idea, but it is rampy nonsense, I truly believe that this will be big I can see paths to multi billion mcaps, but £4-5 by Christmas, that's improbable, not impossible just not likely.

Crusty, there is actually an interesting point, perhaps the algo's are being more and more aggressively tuned, taking greater and greater risks to find an opportunity that others haven't or just to find it first, and that's what we see as whatever was censored. It'll lead to greater and greater variability as they get in on a just in case basis, and out again on a that immediately didn't go the way we wanted as they are more marginal than ever before.

Right now we have an Mcap of £100m let's say that the max that a fund could invest is £5m else they start to hit supply problems especially if more than one is trying to buy. That level of investment is too low for them to be concerned about, too low to do the research let's say it 10bagged, they'd make £50m, that's not actually an interesting amount of money for larger funds. They can't invest yet is my opinion.

The question is what does a 1.2MW diesel engine cost, are we less than that? Perhaps even including proposed additional costs for dirty fuels in the future. They will run into the millions.

I'm happy with that.

Older and wiser, a direct quote from the bishop = filtered

I'm seeing, maybe 5 years from now maybe 10, doctors surgeries having a stock of LFDs covering many issues, some affimer based some not, but essentially creating the position where accurate diagnosis for more and more can be given in-consultation. Other technologies might exist but they will need more hardware, with storage stable devices this could be beneficial to practises.

If someone tells Medusa that there's a spelling error, they'll either say 'thanks we'll look into it', or 'what brochure'

3 pieces of news about different territories in 6 weeks, what more do you reasonably expect? Last news was 1st Nov, 18th Oct before that. Want them to give you a hug too?

Haggis, unless ABB have need and just want the tech not the going concern of a business.

Don't fall for it, look at the world class diagnostics industry that isn't allowed exemptions, whilst backyard class tests from China are allowed free reign.

And then spend 2+years on the clinical program to prove safety and efficacy. Not worth it.

Isn't that the point of a consultation, to get responses and then ignore them and do what you were going to do anyway.

But it could mean that an etf focusing on that group will be easier to manage and more likely.

It's just an index changing, AIM is still AIM.

I care not a jot for the UK gov endorsement, far too risky.

Amanesia, the hash rate is accounted for in their mining per period values, afterall that is what the hash rate delivers.
The BTC holdings, are only a fraction of their Mcap, subtract that and we still have a much lower mcap per btc production than they do. Ergo we are either cheaper than them, or they are more expensive that us.
@ at 4000 Btc holding, that's worth 240m, call it 500m if accounting for a doubling+ of the BTC price, that's only 1/6th of their Mcap, not a huge amount.

So riot produces 2-2.5x as many as we do per month but is 6x greater mcap, Mara also produce 2-2.5x what we do but is 12x our mcap.

We are therefore cheap, all other things being equal, but are we as efficient (probably), more efficient (possibly), can we assume that our plans for growth are better than theirs, more rapid etc. more effective in terms of hash/£, maybe, but at worst equal to theirs.

My view is that we are therefore cheaper than them. Are they overpriced and we are rightly priced?? that's a different and harder question.

I sniff an agenda somewhere