Member Info for 13thmonkey

I'd presume they buy you out at the market rate... draw your own conclusions, i'm not sure which way to go on this, hold, or move.

bear in mind it's only a 10p drop from the bulk of friday's activity, discounting that UT that appeared at the end with a big jump, it looks artificially bad.

Redhornet. I assumed you were talking about degradation in battery capacity causing the need to replace the battery and that causing a write off.
Right now the battery may get reused in the event of a crash, in a less arduous situation like a house battery or grid scale application. However TM1 have the ability and are scaling to re claim the lithium and hence provide a cheap source of re purposed lithium. I also think there will be aftermarket batteries, I think there already are for leafs.

Red_hornet, TM1 is going to be able to recycle batteries, apparently recycled lithium may perform better than virgin Li, if not then it is as good as, so very circular. The actual cost of the pack is the problem, I think there will be aftermarket options eventually.

Bo77ock7 Self generating? How does that work? Without breaking conservation of energy laws?
Every single electric vehicle using regen braking. Stacker trucks use ancient battery tech.
Many people are buying electric, many many people, just a whiny few who say for my strange needs it won't work.
I await your knowledgeable reply.

I have been wondering where would the shares come from if they start buying. I think, as with most, i'd prefer no dilution, so how do they get in? They can put 2+2 together back in the office and see the potential, they'll have the information to make informed decisions about risk. They can only really throw rounding error levels of money at it due to our current Mcap. But a few II's asking for say £5m each would make life interesting, but as you say, someone has to sell.

The idea of this being a post TU roadshow may not be correct any more, TU has been removed from more recent notifications about it

I'm ever so slightly suspicious that a website for any size company in one of the most digitally engaged countries in the world would hit a data transfer limit, seems very strange to me. However there text on the site correlates with what we expect from them.

Those issues were pre vaccine? For trump pre COVID tbh.

You need to learn what kind of stock this is. Therapeutic and diagnostic. I'm sure you weren't having a not very subtle dig.

if AS and crew have sight of positive data for AVA6000, why do we need a push for new investors? If AS and crew have sight of it then they need to let other people know, that's partly what this is doing. Will new investors be actually giving Avacta money, not necessarily, they could be institutional investors who would buy on the open market hence pushing the share price up. This would have the beneficial effect of making a cheap take over harder, and allow additional investment later (should it be needed) with less dilution.
But to reiterate the really simple answer, they can't beat down Avacta's doors if they don't have the information, we Private investors investing with our own money probably have a much much lower risk risk tolerance than an institutional investor wanting to invest Millions at a time. Hence we will make do with rumours, expectations, trawling through papers to get a hint, whereas they will be told the details, probably at quite a technical level for them to make up their mind based on that.

Until something changes with them there's perhaps little to say?

https://f1i.com/news/430063-newey-intrigued-by-extreme-es-hydrogen-fuel-cell-system.html

The tests may well just not spot it, unless you have good ones.

They would have nothing to do with medusa, they'd buy direct from avacta or someone they had arranged to manufacture on their behalf.

Vegas, it's already here, there is literally no point closing the doors now.

I'd rather they kept the cash, far more useful to shareholders than a buyback.

The underlying question is, is a £2.5bn valuation unreasonable in the next few months? I think yes in a few months it's unreasonable. 6 plus months quite reasonable.

AS has rarely looked like anything other than the car that got the cream.

Therapeutic testing is much much more complex than anything else currently being done by avacta.