CLP.L Share Price (CLP)

I have no idea why this person needs to post their dross outside of the LSE forums.

If they have an issue with Phimx then they should be childish here.

mikey_dj

2 Mar '26 - 20:47 - 24836 of 24836

0 0

Meanwhile, on the LSE phimx needs an FG selfie or IT didn't happen narrative

"Mummy, can i have a biscuit ?" - "No Phimx"

"Mummy, can i have a biscuit ?" - "No Phimx"

"Mummy, can i have a biscuit ?" - "No Phimx"

"Mummy, can i have a biscuit ?" - "No Phimx"

"Mummy, can i have a biscuit ?" - "No Phimx"

Thank You for Your Attention to This Matter.

As some of you may be aware the QBT thread has recently been infested with some random who is a crusader for investor rights and will brook no argument from people who resort to insults because this makes them some lower form of life.

As such they would not wish to publish the following to this forum...

"You're no "skeptic", phimx, you're a malicious, basement bound petulant child. Always goalpost-moving, sarcasm as a shield for your fragile ego."

Which is quite a good description of themselves but we are not allowed to be like them and in order to avoid the destruction of their illusion of themselves they have to vent their frustration on another forum.

PART 3 OF 3

Host: Of course as you mentioned, you're in Dallas at the Mining Disrupt conference, Francesco. How close are you to commercial deployments following the conversations you're having there?

Gardin: Errr, with this version of Oracle C, ahh, it takes us, ahh, from the time we receive a machine to when the Oracle will be implemented on that particular version, usually CGMiner, they have all different flavours of CGMiner, is between 4 and 6 weeks. And that's when we believe that we'll be in a position to say, ok, now you, we, we take back the machine to them in their lab and we say ok now test the performance, errr, of your machine with and without our Oracle, and that's the, ah, a key decision moment for these companies who are all struggling to catch up with the main, with the main, with the monopolist of the market which is Bitmain, and so any chance they have to catch up with this, errr, time-lag, errr, which is, errr, 1 to 2 years, is for them, um ahhh, vital.

Host: Francesco, sounds like an exciting period for the company. I hope you continue keep us updated with your progress.

Gardin: Indeed. Thank you so much, Stephen.

Host: Francesco Gardin, the CEO of Quantum Blockchain Technologies.

PART 2 OF 3

Host: You've also reported a 10% improvement in mining efficiency in lab tests; what does that mean in real-world terms for bitcoin miners and potential partners?

Gardin: Yup, that means that, errr *clears throat* , we modify the CGMiner or ESPMiner or, I mean the operating system of the mining rigs and ahhh *clears throat* we, ahhh, basically improve what we call the "quality hashing". I mean everybody's talking about "hashing speed, hashing speed". Fine, this is very important. But, ahh, there is also, er, a more *laughs* detail [sic] and sophisticated way to analyse the performance of the miner, which is "quality hashes". How good, how many good hashes which are above a certain level of difficulty we can generate. And that's exactly what we do. So by installing this, the energy required is the same, ahhh, because it's something which goes on at the level of the control board, ahh, but the number of "quality hashes", err, meaning, with difficulty above 10, which is the usual difficulty set by, by pools, ahhh, is, is higher. So, same amount of energy, same machine, different operating system with our Oracle, more, ah, "quality hashes" generated. It's a very simple, err, I mean I describe it as simple now, it's been 10 months of hell, err, because, err, we have generated *cough* incredible amounts of data, so far, so much so that, uh, our peta-hash machine had to be, err, err, repaired because it were working too much 24-7. But now we, we have this, and, err, we have ahhh, ahhh, ummmmm, f-f-f-finally, I mean we had to hire a specialist in, on, for this. We are now in control of one of the old, errr, errr, bitcoin, *cough* Bitmain miners, errr, and so we are implented it [sic], errr, err, on this machine, which is not of course, errr, is an S9, so is not a competitive machine nowdays, but err, it's very *swallows*, I mean, it's very *clears throat* good to prove, errr, the, errr *clears throat* the, errr, quality of our Oracle, *coughs* to our clients, and now all the ASIC manufacturers, errr, in the US that we're talking to, errr, our precondition to, errr, ummm, *cough* start the, the real test, uh, errr, which are the, errr, *coughs*, are essential to enter into commercial agreement [sic] is give us a machine, your machine, with this, with the open software, or the operating system, we will modify and will show you how better is the machine with, uhhh, our Oracle, and so far none of them, ahhh, has said no because they understand that we are not prepared to share the information on our Oracle, which is, I mean, errr, years of, of work altogether, and, uhh, that's, ahhh, what we're doing right now, and, which is why we're here in, in Dallas talking directly to these miners, I've been meetings [sic] with these miners to convince them, and they have no problem to send out their machine as soon as possible, we modify, and show the better performance.

[continued on PART 3...]

This thread contains a transcript of Gardin's interview with Proactive on 14 Nov 2025. I produced the transcript myself - it is my own work and has not copied from anywhere.

The original video link is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kqdl-Y8TkgE

The entire transcript is too long for one post, so it has been posted in 3 posts.

The transcript includes Gardin's disfluencies to more closely reflect the aural quality of the interview.

The interview proper begins at around 0:30. The first 30 seconds of the YouTube video are repeated at around 2:54.

Copyright law allows for Fair Use for: critical analysis or enhancing commentary or discussion; where the original video is factual; my derivation does not affect the market of the original video; clear attribution has been provided to the original video.

====================

PART 1 OF 3

Host: Hello, you're watching Proactive. I'm joined by Quantum Blockchain Technologies CEO Francesco Gardin. Francesco, very good to speak with you. This new software-only version of Method C marks a big step forward for QBT. How does it change your commercial roadmap compared with the original hardware version?

Gardin: Ahh, good afternoon, Stephen. Ahhh, yes, errr, definitely, ermm, it was ahh really hard work, ahh, to try to derive a version of the method that, which would not depend on an [sic] hardware implementation. We knew that providing less information to the engine creating the Oracle will lead to, ahh, ummm, results which, ahhh, wouldn't be as good as the, ahh, hardware version. However, this would, this puts us in a situation, errr, in a position where we can actually implement it on the operating system of the miners, ahh, which means that instead of the usual 18-month cycle from the decision of having the method implemented on the ASIC by an ASIC manufacturers [sic], ahhh, to when the actual ASIC is out and is installed on the m-miners, err, err, and the mining rigs, errr, we can, err, actually modify the operating system and, errr, add it to the operating system, errr, which means that the time to market, err, err, is err, err, months *cough* rather than a year and a half. Err, and in fact we're going down this path very, very quickly.

[continued on PART 2...]