Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Could it not just be a large sell that's been worked out wrong the last few days and that's the average price?
Could it be colins salary in issue of shares?
Or would that have to be rns'd prior?
Correction: 3.77p. I forgot the dealing costs were included.
Well, I just had a small top up at 3.79 on the punt that it's CB who is topping up having delivered the AGM !
Don't see much down side here at this price.
It look like a buy at 3.75p x 2.1M
£79K buy?? It looks like it.
CB ???
Was there any mention at the AGM of the IP resistivity survey results that were due to be published months ago?
Seems XTR is either sitting on them or wants to keep them quiet. If either of those situations is correct then I'm not sure why. I guess one solution is they are appear to be good but CB does not want to publish good news into a poor market and have a 24 hour boost followed by a month of drift? Just musing.
Does anybody have anything to add on this subject from the AGM?
Hi iWTO thank you for your reasoning. The 3D resource modelling has a greater impact as it follows the mineralisation trends throughout the resource so will make a big difference to the overall numbers. Otherwise if your were just going by the average grade for each hole you would just need a calculator. I’m not saying it will all be at .44 I never have btw. But I do think the final amount of contained copper may surprise a few. Or I certainly hope at least from my understanding.
Yes sorry the grade factor comment I made was not quite how I meant it lol. Read twice post once
Just one small point, reducing the cut off has no bearing or influence on the resource estimate (500mt) But hey, that’s huge amount of ore, and with the later holes into Ascot that saw an extra 100m plunge added and a final hole to the southern extent that could both potentially add heaps to the already identified resource. Could we be close to an estimated 1billion tonne combined?
Indeed Andrew.. fine post.. and in line with my hopes too...
Tangible bottom line profitability is massive in the AIM game these days.... and by this Nov. 3p plus of this share price could readily be for Fairbride / Africa bottom line, I'm hoping !
(What Bushranger adds around then I wouldn't even hazard a guess.. but I do get that it could be a total gamechanger 'in due course'.. although if Fairbride was delivering as we hope and xtr.l s/p was still in 3'sp around Nov. time, Ted and the gang would likely still be attributing all that 3's p to Bushranger in their comparatives analysis, I'll guess :-) )
Howezap, I think your argument is flawed. Firstly, it is only the original 71Mt resource (@0.3% cut-off) that has been measured at 0.44%. That gives about 0.3Mt of Cu. Then we already know that dropping from a 0.3% cut-off to 0.15% for that same resource adds an extra 0.1Mt of Cu, to give 0.41Mt. That’s from the published open-pit modelling July 2021. (That resource then averages about 0.295% btw).
Since then, hardly any assays have been around the 0.4% mark. Any significant runs of mineralization have been lower - 0.2%, 0.3%, etc. So it’s simply not possible to get to 0.44% overall for the whole of RC. In fact I’d be very surprised if we weren’t at 0.2-0.25%, allowing for the “averaging down” effect of the lowest grade ore (0.15% etc).
I also wouldn’t be surprised to see the 20Mt x 25 year statement from CB turn out to be 25Mt x 25 - because it’s financially beneficial to crunch through rock at a faster rate. I think it’s quite possible that 625Mt is down there, given the 0.15% cut-off. You are quite right, of course, to say overall tonnage of Cu is the most important thing, provided the low grades don’t make it economically unviable.
Hi lucky let me please have one more crack at why RC grades will be potentially a lot higher than .33%Cu. from your post
>> Pleased with the 25@20! that's 1.65mt at .33 ?Add on ascot and we could have 2/2.5/3mt. ?Could be more ar RC if the grade is higher but I doubt it.?
Here’s a fact, The average grade of porphyry copper ore is about 0.4%Cu, with the ‘larger proportion’ of ore minerals being less than 2 percent of the total volume of the ore rock with progressively more ore the lower the grade.
You are still trying to determine the amount of in ground copper by guessing the average grade% When in fact it is the amount of economic recoverable copper within a defined resource that determines the average grade%. Not the other way round. As I have said before, there is substantially more copper in ground the lower the grades are reduced. This is why the low economic cut off of 0.15%Cu is key to this extra copper volume. And the grade factor (.44) is not a assay drill average but the percentage of recoverable copper within the resource.
Jeremy Reid clearly states in the Ascot discovery webinar right at the very end that they estimate 2mtCuEq will come from RC with a resource of about 450mt @ 0.44%Cu hopefully confirmed now with CB’s revaluation of a mine potential of 500mt (25yrs x20mtpa).
Have another listen from about 23mins to end with Colin stating 2mt and shortly after Jeremy Reid confirms the point by also saying once all the assays are put into the model it determines the amount of copper. Which of course then, the copper % within the resource is then calculated.
https://youtu.be/QJ8b--rhvRI
"I think *current* production at Fairbride was stated as 20kg per month by both Colin and Joel. That is increasing over time with full (commercial) production by Nov/Dec."
Lets say Dec before full production.
So that's 20kg a month increase from Sept to Dec (Cb said 100kg a month in full production).
100kg a month is about £400K to £450k FCF (EX all costs and taxes so clear profit)
So circa £80K to £90K clear profit a month now and £80K/£90K extra every month up to December.
Assuming linear progression
Should be over £500K a month clear profit by December from FB + alluvials + small HR plant
IMHO
Thanks Steve for that latest post ( and Andmillsy too for his post below ) High quality posters, both.
quick update from Empress just now on FB
https://youtu.be/CpHKwa0iAyg?t=480
There was a line of questioning about 3 year versus 5 year versus longer mine life at the AGM.
Positive comments about potential to expand from 3 years is supported by Empress statements in the Youtube clip from 8 mins for 1 min.
Thanks to all the people who attended and made notes, hopefully more news to come, in the not to distant future. GLA
I think *current* production at Fairbride was stated as 20kg per month by both Colin and Joel. That is increasing over time with full (commercial) production by Nov/Dec.
I'd like to add my thanks for AGM feedback too.. especially to andmillsy..
As previously stated, my main focus for Sept and Oct was going to be Fairbride 'Ard income :
Re andmillsy feedback from yesterday : ''Fairbride is progressing well and income should be received in Nov / Dec with commercial production.''
After previous CB steer I was hoping for Oct for first meaningful income .... I'm now beginning to think I should listen to Empress timeframe predictions only.. after all, CB's timeframe predictions have spoken for themselves over the years :-)
But, if not expected full commercial levels, even something semi decent in terms of Oct. Fairbride Income could still happen ..maybe/hopefully.. and that would be very useful in itself
For the updates from the AGM.
It sounds like Oct Nov are the money months, probably starting in Sept for the SP rise with FOM.
Copper price should have recovered to 8500-9500 by then.
Very happy with everything tbh.
Many thanks for the AGM updates.
Interesting article on copper prices
https://www.mining.com/two-charts-show-copper-price-drop-may-have-been-overdone/
Hi Andrew just one point worth a mention >>He said twice over the last 18 months that ore is just about to be put on the lorries and is being taken to be processed. <
They were test mining for some time running ore to plant when I believe (without checking) that some further met test work and drilling was done. With the last release mentioning operations will resume soon!
Sorry don’t have time to check facts at moment, I do agree with all your other points.
Agreed, thanks for the feedback.
Oct it is then..
F100
Great feedback from everyone that attended.
My only contribution would be......just because he said it to your face, doesn't mean his timescales will be correct this time.
Pleased with the 25@20! that's 1.65mt at .33
Add on ascot and we could have 2/2.5/3mt.
Could be more ar RC if the grade is higher but I doubt it.
Looking forward to the model though, whenever it may arrive.
Thanks for all the feed back from those that attended the meeting. Appreciated.
In the big picture, the news about Eureka is not that significant as most are here for Bushranger. But yet again it shows the CB is more than just “overly optimistic” with his comments. He said twice over the last 18 months that ore is just about to be put on the lorries and is being taken to be processed. That clearly was not the case and now we have gone from repeated talk of a potential IOCG to hopefully. maybe, getting some income out of this.
2 years ago he predicted $200K a month from Jan 2021 from Eureka
Will Eureka end up going the same way as Moz Gold and Kalengwa (spelling)? If it does, I guess it doesn’t really matter in the overall scheme of things.
Thank God for Fairbride. His one major income success. Which he doesn’t seem to want to promote or celebrate :)
If CB does announce yet another “great accusation project” and not keep focusing on completion of Bushranger sale, then I doubt the market will see that as a positive. Well not before Bushranger sale is completed.
If CB is talking about the model being completed in circa October, then I guess that means Jan next year is more likely? CB does seem to keep insisting the RC model is not as late as it is. He originally gave a timescale of May (June latest) and now its October. First he said it wasn’t late in an interview, now he says it will be only 2 months late! CB needs a new calendar :)
I still believe that there will be a sale of Bushranger and at a much higher price than current SP. But I am not as confident it will be anything like CB’s previous implications and it may not happen until mid 2023 now?
I hope he proves me wrong.
Thanks again to everyone who gave feeback and notes.
Thank you Steve and Ben too for your time and efforts.
That’s good to now have a better understanding of wether the agreement being in place is a potential deterrent. With the resource total for both RC and Ascot now in excess of 2mt (would hope) you could say it has played some part up until now, but then again it was inherited without the option for it to be not in place. But, It’s made it much more clear cut in terms of only needing to concentrate on the asset and not worrying about the share price without that perceived threat of any corporate actions going forward once we are free from its constraints if AA pass on their options.
The share price will take care of itself once modelling , income etc is released
Thanks Steve (and everyone else) for sharing your notes.
Thanks for this very comprehensive feedback Andy.
The couple of months for the model release is something Colin should go on record with. 2months on 2 months gets to be a long piece of string to follow.... and by the sounds of it they must have a good handle on how long the remaining model work will take.
Thanks again though..... the sun is out again.... at least in my head