Proposed Directors of Tirupati Graphite explain why they have requisitioned an GM. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Figures down compared to May.
Reporting Period Month Name June
Reporting Period Year 2020
Oil Production Mass (tonnes) 637.04
Oil Production Volume (m3) 753.00
Oil Production volume (mb/d) 0.16
Oil production density (Kg/m3) 846.00
Associated gas production mass (tonnes) 24.72
Associated Gas Production Volume (MMscf/d) 0.03
Associated Gas Production Volume (ksm3) 23.10
Associated Gas Production density (kg/sm3) 1.07
Water production mass (tonnes) 235.70
Water production volume (ksm3) 235.70
Water production volume (mb/d) 0.05
Reporting Period Month Name May
Reporting Period Year 2020
Oil Production Mass (tonnes) 736.87
Oil Production Volume (m3) 871.00
Oil Production volume (mb/d) 0.18
Oil production density (Kg/m3) 846.00
Associated gas production mass (tonnes) 22.04
Associated Gas Production Volume (MMscf/d) 0.02
Associated Gas Production Volume (ksm3) 20.60
Associated Gas Production density (kg/sm3) 1.07
Water production mass (tonnes) 87.60
Water production volume (ksm3) 87.60
Water production volume (mb/d) 0.02
Oil production down to 160 bopd. Water production up to 50 barrels a day. Gas down slightly.
Yes... there was a workover notes of observed tankers
Pump rods out, Smokey flare afterwards
then in the last week production doubled
June 2020
3rd 1,
4th 1
5th 1
———6 for the week?
8th 2
Crane
Pump lifted
9th pumprods
10th wire line
10th tanker 1267 waste?
Perf guns?
11th tanker
12th 1
——///6
15th 1
16th 1
Flare working smokey.
————5
22nd 2
23rd 4
24th 2
26th 2
———— 11
They spent 6 days cleaning up after lowering the pump
11th to the 16th
Then the flare went clean and tankers doubled
Maybe they should show a little respect and courtesy to shareholders and announce the figures themselves; especially if planned work on the well doubled output. What are they worried about? Shareholders will not revolt over bonuses being paid for the start of the Turkish Adventure - some seem to even celebrate them as the increased losses allegedly increase value of the company because of the accumulating tax losses.
Thanks Tony, I did not realise that you kept such good notes.
So it looks like they were in production for 24 of the 30 days in June. Which means that the overall production in total over those 24 days was in the region of 200 bopd. A tanker a day. That's not bad.
Interesting to see what they get in the figures for July.
Were they trying to get HH2 sorted in June, does anyone recall any activity on that well? If so, the water figures in the June figures would be skewed as HH2z had water ingress issues and would have produced quite a bit if they did try to flow it.
Not good - water cut 23% , total number of barrels of fluid (oil plus water) at 207 cp 201 in May
Oil production only 65% of April's number
Mirasol, but do you know whether they were doing anything with HH2z? They may have been, and if so, the water produced from that well would have to be counted in the figures right?
Why did they pull the rods from HH1 in June? That doesn't sound like routine maintenance to me, must have been to achieve something.
There was obviously some clean up after the intervention. Hance extra kill fluids needed to be flowed out (water) before 100% oil cut resumed.
Looking good chaps on HH-1.
Also Looking forward to some activity on HH-2 once HH-1 is in finally in final production setup.
Watch the Twitter for updates :-)
GLA
It’s in the rns’s
They lowered the pump.
I believe it has reduced the percentage of gas to oil produced
When did the Twitterati spread the rumour of the well being a dead duck? I watched that video but cannot remember if it was June or July. The mumbling voices in the background sounded engineered to me, FOTH and his fantasy world where he is right and everyone else is wrong (unless its a matter of fire extinguisher safety).
Cinders
They can only enter figures for productions wells. HH-2Z is not a production well so anything that comes out of it is not entered.
"It’s in the rns’s They lowered the pump. I believe it has reduced the percentage of gas to oil produced"
may 183 bopd gas 0.02 mmscfd
june 158 bopd gas 0.03 mmscfd
Oil down gas up I'm afraid
"When did the Twitterati spread the rumour of the well being a dead duck? "
When SS stopped reporting it's "potential" in glowing terms
Kill fluids are not production water. The figures included are for water produced from a well not those introduced externally.
Now we have 2 figures for HH, exact OGA production from HH-1 and approximate production from the whole site over 2 months. The difference must be test production from HH-2z.
28 April RNS:- Total production 'over 100,000bbls.
30 June RNS:- Total production 113,143bbls.
Whilst not precise that suggests somewhere around 13,000bbls produced during May and June.
Meanwhile OGA has 871 and 753 cu metres for May and June respectively just for HH-1.
That's 1624 cu m total or 10,215bbls. Assuming UKOG weren't massively understating production on 28 April that suggests that HH-2z produced somewhere around 2,500bbls of oil in May and June
As for tanker counts, there were days that week, unsurprisingly, as even HH-1 needed about 7 waste tankers during the month, waste tankers were leaving the site that posters were still claiming contained oil. Here's part of a post of mine from 24 June:-
'Yesterday, when there were 4 tankers: and johnrogan9 mentioned N66 was around this is what N66 tweeted - 'One load of production water back in then yard ready for disposal.'
So maybe (at least) one tanker was water........it could have come from somewhere else in the Weald but it has got a 1267 plate.'
But even if every tanker Tony counts was oil there was also oil flow during the months from HH-2z, and tankers can leave with stored oil, not necessarily just recent production.
I'm more concerned about the water - about 1500bbls sounds excessive from a workover. With these figures now out in the public domain surely UKOG need to make a comment about what is happening at HH.
Ibug, can you provide a document from an official source that stands by your statement that kill fluids dont count?
Penguins,
Do you know if HH2z counts as production or not? Is that still formally in EWT stage?
I am a little worried by water cut, especially as HH1 had only ever produced dry oil.
Guess we need to wait for that elusive RNS, must be due as soon as this current workover is complete.
Cinders
Why don't you read PONS and PPRS on the OGA website. What am I? Your mother!
The amount of water produced in the OGA returns far exceeds the amount you can stick down a well. You are looking at at least 6 tankers of produced water which the eyes never seem to show.
Who is conning who? At least you know the OGA figures are correct or are UKOG telling porkies in their returns?
Cynderlad,
Only stuff coming out of HH-1 is included in OGA figures.
I did read the regs on rreporting and am pretty sure everything coming out of the well (HH-1) even if it's put in the well is reported - if they are injecting the amount injected is also reported separately.
Didn't look at the gas - increase in gas cut not good either.
Tony - the subsurface workover - moving the pump position and perforating didn't happen in June as it was still 'planned' at the end of June.
This is the full entry:
Field Production Data, PPRS (WGS84): Horse Hill
Field region LAND
Reporting unit name HORSE HILL
Reporting Unit Type Code T
Reporting Unit Type Description Onshore Oil Field
Operator Organisation Group UK OIL & GAS PLC
Onshore,Offshore Flag Onshore
Reporting Period in yyyymm format 202006
Reporting Period Month 06
Reporting Period Month Name June
Reporting Period Year 2020
Oil Production Mass (tonnes) 637.04
Oil Production Volume (m3) 753.00
Oil Production volume (mb/d) 0.16
Oil production density (Kg/m3) 846.00
Dry gas production mass (tonnes)
Dry gas production volume (ksm3)
Dry Gas Production volume (MMscf/d)
Dry Gas Production Density (kg/sm3)
Associated gas production mass (tonnes) 24.72
Associated Gas Production Volume (MMscf/d) 0.03
Associated Gas Production Volume (ksm3) 23.10
Associated Gas Production density (kg/sm3) 1.07
Gas Condensate mass (kg)
Gas condensate volume (ksm3)
Gas condensate volume (mb/d)
Gas condensate density (kg/sm3)
Injected water mass (tonnes) 0.00
Injected water volume (m3) 0.00
Injected water volume (mb/d) 0.00
Water production mass (tonnes) 235.70
Water production volume (ksm3) 235.70
Water production volume (mb/d) 0.05
Reinjected produced water volume (m3) 0.00
Just had a skim read of and 'search' for water in person guide (V5) and not so sure that kill fluid etc would be counted as only previously injected water is mentioned.
if it isn't then the water cut is about 24%........surely that's not right.
thats pprs guide (petroleum production reporting system) not person guide!
Tony/ Ibug, thanks for relaying those early morning figures. Pity we don`t get regular RNS`s. I think it would steady the SP.
But small as it may seem, we have increased production, lets hope that trend continues. This time next month "Rodney", better production figures and SCC go ahead, higher SP.
Chunky trades, 52.1m shares traded across 38 trades, average size of trade = 1.37m.
Penguins
Brockham produced more water in the 1st year from the Portland than oil. The 2nd year it was 50/50 and the 3rd year it was 50% more water than oil. Why does everyone not expect to find water in the Portland? Why did UKOG put down to drill an injection well. They obviously expected it.