Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
SH, you're really setting yourself up for the potential of a gigantic kick in the balls. That's the problem with hubris, the fall is further and the pain greater.
Stack...
Eeyore !!
Clearly you do not understand 🤣
Slander or libel same outcome.
You understand the context of the conversation.
"decided to challenge following legal routes" 🤣
Nearly wet myself.
I'll walk you through this very simply. Was the statement made in a place that could be considered public? Was the statement defamatory and demonstrably untrue, and known to be untrue by the person making the statement? Was the subject of the statement clearly identifiable?
Unless your birth name is 'cash my giro' it's literally impossible to write anything libelous about you here. FFS, what a thick donkey you are.
Don’t be silly stack, we have all those TR1s to be released this week, the fab 4 rampers, BBG, RK1, DBW and Bravissimo all say so……🤡🤡🤡🤡
Musk, Bezos, Gates and Buffet will all soon each own 50% of Solg 🤣🤣🤣
I'm obviously not certain, add- that would be mad. It's a public stock. But there's a reason I've repeatedly called it right here. Rather than believe the hype, from SC or the rampers here, just stick to what's likely and what's happened elsewhere. Am established playbook, rather than expecting a random act of charity. I know you'll thank me for my advice but then ignore it because you think you know better, but I'll say it again - there's a reason I've called it right thus far.
CMG, you made my point regarding your lack of education because you cannot distinguish between slander and libel!! You are an ignoramus and I won't waste my time with because I have nothing to learn from you.
You're always so certain, aren't you? Why can't you accept the truth, which is that not one of us knows what's likely to unfold? I'm afraid you're not in possession of special powers or stunning insight - you're in the dark, as are we all.
Stack
What appologies are you looking for. . You certainly won't be getting one from me.
Do you think someone saying another on a chat forum is a mugger of pension isn't answerable.
Yes.. very traceable if the accused/slandered, decided to challenge following legal routes.
Meanwhile, in solg news... The last time it dropped like it's currently doing from over 10p, at the start of the new year, it took less than 2 weeks to go below 8p. Repeat this week/next? Wouldn't rule it out.
There will be news, add, but the market knows that those with deep pockets are never charitable, so it ain't going to be truly non-dilutive (because shareholders are going to have to give something in return for the cash, duh) and it ain't going to be at a big premium. So there is every chance we'll be pegged down below 10p for the foreseeable, and people like eloro will end up being more correct in their cynicism than the rampers are in their brainless 'jam tomorrow ' narrative.
So not traceable then, cash? So you lied? That's not slander (sic. You mean liable), it's a fact.
Where's the apology? Or are you too cowardly to admit you were only pretending that posters here are traceable? Gosh, where does this bb find these numpties? First novice, then red, then the dbw/slug couple, now this guy. Simpletons, liars and fantasists to a man.
Stack or Eloro...
Same person matters not.
Continue with the slander on my name , that's I'm a mugger of pensioners.
Yes... Very traceable if complaints made.
SH, I don't for one moment doubt that the current sp is a result of the funding issue. But, based upon what SC has said, I believe we'll have news on that fairly soon. In fact, there's no question we will - circumstances demand it.
Quite a leap between confidence and an understanding, Stack.
You really ought to play the ball sometimes and not the man. I know that's less gratifying for you but it would save you looking a bit silly.
Eloro, define 'tangible outcomes'. I would argue we've seen quite a few recently.
Let's face it, you're interested in one thing only (to be honest, so am I) which is a disposal. The difference between us is an understanding of where we've come from and what's required to deliver a good outcome. I don't want to see us throw away such an amazing asset and if that means there are still building blocks needed to provide that outcome, so be it.
Excellent line, cash.
Come on them- where am I posting this from? If you can't say, you need to apologise for pretending to be able to trace other posters, then apologise again for attempting to intimidate them.
Next post is my location or your apology - you show us how clever you are.
If there was market confidence in 'what Scott is trying to achieve ' we wouldn't be at 9p, add. To say it's fine because he knows what he his doing is to suggest you know better than the market, isn't it? If and when Scott has a good idea, the market will react. So far the market has been so unimpressed that the SP has more than halved. If we recover into the 20s it might be time to say Scott is working on something meaningful, until then it's just hot air to try and keep his job, keep the asset, and prevent a drift too much further down.
Or is my l2 broken
Bravo eloro.
Keep up the slander.. on my character.
You are traceable, if you continue.
Internet bullies can't hide anymore.
All the best.
CMG …. Seriously don’t bother. Anyone who seriously felt that way about a company wouldn’t be invested….. unless they couldn’t think of better opportunities to recoup their losses. Just use your filter button and forget it …
I don't need your advice CMG, thanks. Knowing how much my posts gets under your skin, I will have to up my posting game so that you either filter me, or end up on medication to cope with all my negative posts which actually are not lies. I bother you so much you are reading my posting history. Seems personal to me this animosity you have.
Scott has done a terrible job and I wouldn't be surprised if Ecuador dont nationalise the assets due to failure to perform.
I envisage you as a mugger who hangs around looking for pensioners to mug. That's the vibes I am getting from you CMG.
Eloro
Sell up and move on, while you still can.
If it's that bad. My old, son. .
Add, I know you believe what you are posting. However, I want to see theory become reality. So far that hasn't happened. Lots of talk, but no tangible outcomes.