The latest Investing Matters Podcast with Jean Roche, Co-Manager of Schroder UK Mid Cap Investment Trust has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Bonkersman- you pick a good example, but one where the company's SP needed only a ~60% rise to meet the analyst targets. I hope you'll be magnanimous enough to conceed that I'm right about the usual disconnect between opening bids and analyst targets, especially when the SP and the out-of-date targets are separated by a near 4-fold disparity?
Miketrix- my view is that solg will be sold. I just won't let fools like bubble, red or fort tell people it is imminent, which anyone who knows anything about CA can see it isn't. That's disingenuous ramping, and needs calling out. If I'm condescending, it's because there's only one direction in which to talk when speaking to thickos like bubble. I'm sure I'm not the smartest on this board, but I'm not as thick as red and his fantasy career in the city, fort and his total lack of market knowledge, or bubble and his infantile, repetitive cries for attention.
So mr1981,
With respect, what is your view and where do you stand with respect to Solgold?
I've seen nothing but disrespectful and downright condescending views from your good self that are adding absolutely nothing of value to this board.
I disagree with more than half the people on this board, the other half I think spend way too much time on here and well as another 30% (yes said tongue in cheek) if I could be would probably start an argument with in real life if their views on the board were as obnoxious, self absorbed and lacking any real deep though in real life as they are on here.
Fine to disagree with people, but don't act like a t_wat. Would be nice if you posted something factual, interesting, thought provoking related to Solgold with actual ideas... You don't have a clue who and how much people may or may not be invested here so don't go round saying everyone is clueless bar your good self. If you think your the smartest investor in the room, your in the wrong room buddy so do yourself a favour and move on for your own sanity.
Yes 1981 investor, I think analysts target prices is one of the few things I do understand after all these years, and if they were always reliable and nothing else ever impacted financial markets we could all be rich.
No matter what nonsense I sometimes spout, there is always examples that prove me correct, and like most people I conveniently ignore the examples that prove me wrong.
So in order to prove me correct, recently Wood PLC shares leapt from a steady £1.50 to well over £2 on a bid of £2.30. It just so happens that the average analyst target was £2.40, and the initial bid was increased later to exactly that. But without looking I’m sure I could cite examples that prove me wrong, I’m sure lastminute.com during the dotcom boom was one.
Bonkersman, with respect, do you understand what an analysts target price is? And how little correlation that has ever had to opening TO bid values? Have a dig around, it won't take you long to understand how off bubble is. He is one of the rampers that encourages others to put faith in Maxit. Pick a company Maxit has represented, and you will see. Even the irrelevant Noront that the rampers so love to hold up (because they don't understand the differences between us and them) didn't manage a 350% jump from unaffected to opening. The sort of increase bubble is spaffing over took 4 bids.
My facts will hurt his feelings, and he'll lash out about 'infestations' or whatever (lazy language best left to the 1930s...) but we all know who knows their stuff and who is a brainless hype man.
1981 investor, I appreciate that analysts can be, and are often wrong with their targets, but, the average target price from 4 analysts is 75p based on todays reported resources and share price.
So one would not be shocked if Bubble was proved correct, but off course he could also be proved wrong, that’s investing for you.
And there he is again!!,like a rash you just can't get rid of him ,thought you'd disappeared down the hole you came from ,hurry up it's getting dark soon ,leave the board to the honest genuine posters new and old
Just so nobody misses this, the ever-clever bubble is saying that he expects a several-hundred-percent premium from the current SP as an opening bid for a TO. Multiple times the current SP, which has been around for months. As an opener. Jesus wept you couldn't write his nonsense.
Don't let him forget this in a year or so when the first bid does come in. He'll still be posting one of his 4 catchphrase ramps several times a day by then, but he won't be able to bury this particular moment of stupidity. It will haunt him.
Eish ,yes indeed nobody ever mentions about the other sites we currently hold ,you put them all together,bear in mind nm said that there was an even bigger tier 1 in solgolds portfolio add them together the value is massive so as we stand today just over 20p this is a screaming buy Eish the £1.32 I might not get but wouldn't be surprised to see an offer around 75-80p mark to kick things off imho
Bubble, these are REALLY interesting times for us here on Solgold! Why have we just kept on rising (above 20p)? What has been leaked? What have we really got at Pornevir, Tandy or elsewhere?
No problem - we have the "Goods"! Who is interested in buying in?
Nice to be a LTH at this point in time, LOL!
Eish,they might
https://www.news24.com/fin24/companies/sibanye-not-interested-in-bidding-as-newmont-makes-final-r360bn-play-for-newcrest-mining-20230411
Just wondering if Solgold will fit into any future plans as regards this merger? Newmont would become the worlds biggest gold producer but would an added 26milOz and Copper production for 50 years entice them further?
Guess the Chinese are our masters, LOL!
Red,chunky late trade there
Bogota,maybe
Leaky ship....is there news ahoy?
Didn't take him long lol!!:):), carry on at your own leisure green poster !!:):)
After all the work was done, the Porvenir study was due to be released, around the time it was shelved... given we were not given a detailed rationale for the decision to can it, investors are left to make their own ideas as to why....
I'm guessing here, but if the results of the study were positive, I very much doubt our board would have just shelved it..
The Chinese will with no doubt be our
Buyers .how will Lasso be able to pay back loans and get more investment to infrastructure? Just hope it's not detrimental to existing share holders but will probably see some deal done as to internal tax/ revenues swap for loans. But they are deffo coming
Sorry if reality sometimes bursts your bubble, bubble. You keep hyping red and fort like the good little boy you are... They'll repay you when they sell their millions of imaginary shares next week, or the week after: whenever it is they keep suggesting the company will definitely have sold by.
Honestly, they're all as stupid as the next, but they really do hate a dose of realism. Thanks for the upticks from people who have engaged the brain of an investor.
Thats better green posts now appear ,what a good balanced board we have now
Derogatory /Demeaning and abusive 1981nvestor at I again i see ,well folks filter him and let him talk to himself ,he's not worth replying too imho
Sorry, sh4reinvest- did you have a point? Should we be worried that solg levels of investment from the Chinese are so small, when fort sees that as key to explorers succeeding in Ecuador? It's a legit question- he just doesn't want to answer because, once again, it exposes him as a deeply unintelligent ramper with little substance to support his ridiculous nonsense.
Fort- remind us how blackrock moving shares between funds keeps our SP down? You've still never explained how you were able to write something so stupid and use it to try and ramp.
Have a day off- the SP is returning to something like the value it should have maintained before Bob proved he doesn't always have the best read on the markets...
Fruta del Norte is not a pure chinese play as has Lundin involved. You also have Codelco in south. The partners involved with Fruta del Norte gold mine are looking to step up production now after a steady and profitable stage of the mine life. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if we saw the Chinese take on Alpala only to then focus immediate development on Tandy/open pit production while continuing to do prep work and studies on Alpala block cave works.
Tandy as well as Porvenir are both very attractive to parties that like a low capex v high Roi.
Block caving requires expert knowledge so 'partnering' can derisk. Codelco are a good fit for Chinese as they have worked together on numerous mines and Codelco understand block caving as do likes of Anglo and Rio.
https://im-mining.com/2022/10/12/codelco-and-rio-tinto-to-put-heads-together-on-underground-copper-mining-innovation-from-block-caving-to-electric-fleets/
Not much on offer on the order book at present
Wondered when tweedle dee and tweedle dum would show up... 1981 for fooks sake, shut your cake hole mate!
Cue his partner in crime to show up shortly (Cov-suck-the-fun-out-the-room-Gaz) ... lol
Hi fort. Not a subtle ramp today? Just a balls-out blatant one.
If we follow your logic, should we therefore be worried that BHP own twice as big a stake in solg cf. our new Chinese investors?