The latest Investing Matters Podcast with Jean Roche, Co-Manager of Schroder UK Mid Cap Investment Trust has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
As usual Slug you remain the most unintelligent poster on here.
I have had other plonkers like you suggest trades that I have made in other shares were people manipulating the share price.
So as usual you are talking rubbish.
Q, how does your dividend strategy apply to solg? None have been paid.
I've been reluctant to buy into the manipulation argument, but we know the question has been raised by the company. Perhaps in this instance there's something to it?
Morning addicknt, it was an example showing what I do .
If people have Solgold shares in pensions then the don't have to have dividends to crystallise assets, in order to have available cash for drawdown.
That's one example.
Also people moving share's from a private holding to an account happens.
But the most common is day traders who set limits making small amounts of money.
So they sell at a level set and then set a buy level just high enough to make say fifty pounds.
On a day with limited trading, this can look like manipulation to those that have no idea about trading.
It's simple, if these fools think share price manipulation is happening, go to the relevant authority and summit your evidence.
You are right not to buy into this nonsense.
Just another reason why volume matter's.
It stops this type of nonsense, as the price usually goes one way or another and these trades become more difficult to make.
Oh the joy of watching others' projection.......
Quady says - " they sell at a level set and then set a buy level just high enough to make say fifty pounds. "
By the way Quady, you might want to check page 16 of the Gazette, as there is a coupon for tuppence ha'penny off a loaf of Hovis at Spar, while stocks last, mind.
I wish the same to you tiny @ GST but can't see it, now please leave what you can't afford alone and speak to you again on 2/01/2025 on GST, where no doubt that the bunch of rampers will be long gone and the price well đ¤
Kat2008 I realise you are not quite right.
You support Putin without any knowledge on the region.
You are a climate denier.
It wouldn't surprise me to find out you follow some religion or pseudo religion .
Then you would have the complete set of nonsense going on in your head, which would go some way to explaining why you think the way you do.
That's right skint.
As long as we both know the truth I'll take it.
đ
Ok looks like it's going to be a quiet day regards any SOLG news ...
have a good day all and stay away for the sake of these nonces...
55p Someday soon !!!
"It wouldn't surprise me to find out you follow some religion or pseudo religion ." Quady.
Yes, I quite curious about something called WOKE. Are you familiar with it ?
I see novice is having another meltdown why would he even be entertaining the idea what nonces get up to and first thing in the morning?
Hmmmmm that's suspect.
I'll leave you to it.
Suspicious*
Climate alarmism IS a cult/religion!
Slug mistaking us for people who care, yet again
Price down today and the twat behind the green box appears. Itâs like clockwork
Ignore the khunt
Slug yet again you show yourself to be the most unintelligent poster on here.
You are now saying Science is a cult/religion.
It is when itâs based on politics not actual sicence, is not allowed to be challenged and is protected by state sponsored propagandaâŚ.
Ok slug challenge the science then.
Show me peer reviewed study that shows climate change is a hoax.
Not a you tube video, or some idiot has posted.
Start off by explaining how we got from 200 ppm to roughly 425 ppm in such a short time period.
Try explaining why the natural worlds carbon sync's are saturated and why CO2 levels are climbing and not going down.
Weâve done this. Youâre sucked in by it all and canât see why
For the 2 million years before the last 800,000 you lot quote it was consistently 1000ppm due to geological effects, ie far higher than now
Did those effects just stop the minute man occupied the planet.
You know deep down itâs total bullocks. If it really was ah âexistential threatâ the we would be at war with India and China to stop them using fossil fuels and âkilling the planetâ
Do they care less about their children than we do about ours? Or do they just not buy the hoax?
Just consider some uncomfortable facts, such as the one that more than half the supposed warming claimed since records began came before the Industrial Revolution when the population was far smaller and didnât use fossil fuels in any great quantity
Itâs bloody obvious if you open your eyes to it. You just wonât. Because itâs a cult
Slug you are a liar or a complete fool, or both.
It was 20 million years ago when the Earth was 1,000 parts per million.
No human life existed because not only could it not exist, it couldn't even start.
Evidence attached below.
I show evidence you show video's which are unsubstantiated.
https://earth.org/data_visualization/a-brief-history-of-co2/
Quady, itâs political! Itâs a left wing ideology and nothing at all do with science. The link has never been proven and it canât be, we canât rewind Earth 300 years and play it again without fossil fuels!
Like all left wing projects it is collectivist. They create a vision of a world they like which typically involves everybody having to behave in a particular way
Conversely right wing ideologies are typically more individualist and based on personal responsibility
When the right protests for example, itâs usually to defend an individual freedom or to ask to be left alone rather than telling others what they have to do
If you believe in the rubbish, then live your life accordingly. Just donât expect/mandate others to agree
Slug again what you say make's no sense.
You argue like a child about left and right politics without understanding the terms left and right.
This defines politics.
Both left and right understand this , yes we get a few loons, but even China is getting board.
Before you start posting about china and coal mines, do some research first soat least you try to understand what's happening.
Also those that don't get on board will end up costing you more .
You made the point some time ago that people were paying for my exported solar.
No they are paying for not reducing their carbon footprint.
China contributes 33x what we do in terms of CO2 (plant food) yet it is opening a brand new coal power station every week
Once youâve convinced them to give up cheap energy and prosperity then you can come back and preach in the U.K.
Mark my words, it will all fall apart much sooner than you think. Estimates of around ÂŁ3 trillion to reach net misery by 2050 means no amount of taxes or borrowing makes it anything like feasible
Slug proving he's as clueless about GDP as he is about climate.
Net zero globally could cost $9 trillion A YEAR but that's only a fraction of global gdp. Costs of not acting will increase YonY (so long as they are recognised and not dismissed as weather by simpletons...) so economic case is easier to make.
All this stupidity on his part aside... THIS IS A SOLG BOARD NOT A CLIMATE CHANGE/IMMIGRATION/WATER-POWERED CAR FANTASY BOARD
He clearly lacks friends in the real world so posts and unholy amount of his nonsense here. Poor petal.