The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode with London Stock Exchange Group's Chris Mayo has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Manifesto - Your point being LC is not prevented by vaccines as shown by a recent study. Sure that is interesting and presents an opportunity.
But as FTC pointed out the vaccines never claimed to prevent LC they claimed to prevent you dying from covid how many of those LC suffered would have died without the vaccines? We’ll never know that but I’d wager probably quite a few.
Anyway LC could be a lucrative market for SNG.
Ghia
Covid vaccines were descibed as added protection NEVER
'to prevent you dying from Covid" None of the Vaccine producers made any such
claim...How could they??? ...That is the most ridiculous thing I have seen on here..
Stop making things up for goodness sake......
L
Imagine the Lawsuits if they did claim that!!!
Mani - You have a really weird personality.
The vaccine manufacturers ensured they had zero liability.
I took the vaccine because I felt it would aid my chances if I caught covid. They indeed claimed it would prevent you dying from covid that was the primary end point of the trials numpty!
Ghia
The FDA approved Covid vaccines based on added protection...NOT because they
prevent patients dying..... There has never been a claim by any covid vaccine manufacturer
that their vaccine will prevent you dying...You are talking nonsense...!
To Top it off, Mani-c has come out as an Anti Vaxxer to boot!!
Her ramping and shame no no-boundaries! Some old LTH's had relatives that died and past away or were seriously ill prior vaccine roll outs! investors on her beware of this disgusting individual.
Shame on you Mani-c pushing this agenda to prove a point and yet again highjack the conversation
You are a dangerous person on here!
The wheels really have come off this board the last few days/weeks!
Grow up AXE..... Clearly stated I am not anti-vax I have had the vacination and
the booster as I declared earlier so stop lying ......
The fact vaccines do not protect against long covid is of great relevance to
SNG shareholders as there is a possibility our drug may offer protection..
So any balanced poster will get that is the reason I am interetsed in the
King's College London Study...... ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with being anti-vax
Only the idiots trying to detract from a normal debate are pushing that narrative..
It's getting boring now ...............
Agreed Doc83
Picking up on your post the other day I'll be a bit concerned as well if we have no news by the end of September. Not that I expect it to shift the sp, but we should at least have the peer reviewed jounal paper by then.
If we do however get to the end of September (the summer :) without Activ 2 results and / or a platform trial then I think RM will have to give a transparent update to the market. They revised the Activ 2 results to the 'summer' so I suspect he's unwittingly tied himself in to a half year update. As ever good luck all
Always interesting how people go to Tracy Hoeg for data on COVID vax issues.
Always worth a read of this before you make your mind up one what she posts, why she posts
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/dumpster-diving-in-vaers-doctors-fall-into-the-same-trap-as-antivaxxers/
Finally posters are being honest and highlighting the assumptions they are making!! We might be making progress here folks.
Ghia
I think Tommy has always been honest...It is you that many here now realise make sthings up ..!!!
I notice you did not apologise to Tommy for claiming he ramped about ACTIV2 trial..
He responded to show you were unfounded...But you seemed to ignore that post but
responded to his latest post as it suited you.......
Manifesto - I’ve never claimed Tommy is dishonest but it is at least nice to see they are now emphasising the extent of the assumptions in their posts.
If I was suggesting anyone is dishonest it’s yourself.
Poly would have invested on mathematics or in layman terms would be able to afford to lose their position. Unfortunately I feel quite a few are pulling at straws when anything good comes of this company.
Warm regards to all the old regulars .
Not going to apologise or respond to Tommy's reply to you then...No surprise there...!
There is nothing in Tommy's post that suggests
"
they are now emphasising the extent of the assumptions in their posts. "
Tommy as normal is sharing his research and he has always been objective....You
are just trying again to discredit one of the most appreciated posters here....
I think you have clearly shown yourself to be dishonest.. On the day of the AGM you thanked
Doc83 and Wigster for their reports... The weeks later in a post directed at me to prove
your point you said you said you were at the AGM..... Really... I do not believe that for a second.
Man up Ghia.....You owe Tommy an apology!!
Manifesto - I don’t owe Tommy an apology he asked for prof I provided proof. He then back tracked and started discussing what he would consider ramping etc.
Taking the argument into the grey at that point it’s a waste of time.
Back onto the AGM point I thanked Doc & Wigster for their synopsis because they put a lot of effort into producing it for the benefit of all here.
I shared my synopsis of events on a closed forum which can be found if you know where to look and have the access to do so.
I cannot post it on an open forum because it would betray the confidence of the person I attended the event with who was there for business reasons and not for personal reasons.
More lies Ghia!
Anything that the Board said at the AGM is in the public domain...You really do talk rubbish
when it suits you!
Tommy did not back track..... You are just not man enough to apologise....Others can
see that...You really are starting to treat posters here like fools.....
Hi Ghia, re your comment:
"I shared my synopsis of events on a closed forum which can be found if you know where to look and have the access to do so.
I cannot post it on an open forum because it would betray the confidence of the person I attended the event with who was there for business reasons and not for personal reasons".
It's your synopsis not the person you attended the AGM with. I'm not following. Please forgive my ignorance but how does that betray the confidence of the said individual?
Ghia
You provided no such thing as proof.
You claimed I had ramping about Activ 2 on the 11th March. I ask you again to show me the post of mine on the 11th of March that was ramping Activ 2?
The facts are these and anyone can check them.
There was confusion as to whether we along with SAB had been paused in activ2. SAB had been announced as paused and we had not but the NIH website had been recently updated and it said we were still enrolling. I questioned a number of people including Matterhorn about the update and what it meant and I asked you at the time if you had proof or were just guessing about the pause.
At no time did I ramp the issue of Activ 2 but when I saw the note from one of the Activ team saying we had been paused I agreed with your post.
All of this is in my posting history. It’s very sad that you’ve started to misrepresent events in the way that you have. You were once a well respected posted in my eyes but no more
Size82 - Because my synopsis largely agrees with what Doc83, Wigster and others have posted across the forums. There are two additional details which I have which I cannot share openly they are around who specifically was in the room and from which companies.
I leveraged a friendship to work out this information and will not betray that trust.
This information may be useful in the long term outlook of the share but is unlikely to be of any relevance for this year.
I had dinner last night with the Directors of Poly/TFG, they have
told me some information that I cannot possibly share on here
as they trust me... I will however share it on a closed forum.....!
Dinner was delicious, they paid the bill and RM and Prof. Holgate
joined us for coffee and brandies.... RM had one too many brandies
and let slip some news he really should not have.. But naughty old
me I leveraged the fact I was an investor and he just could not help
himself........!!!! :0
That is one of the oldest sacma on Chat Board... I have inside info.....OMG!
scams....