London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Your right , your not interested in this ,now ,but you will be when they agree to purchase ignite giving exactly the same reasons as the Krunch deal .. Krunch lost 85k and Mos purchase was 1.4 m ish .what will they value ignite at … not fantasy,not bashing as you put it ,but history , everyone listed on companies house as being in ignite ,are Mos directors, the one employee of ignite (it’s 1) looks to be the ignite accountant who is a director of Mos( I think that’s correct ) ..now I’ve not made any of this up the figures for Krunch via RNS ,names of directors/mos ignite all on companies house ,so my only question is if BET is successful will they use a dilution (same as Krunch ,after massively ramping podcast) off the increase in SP to purchase ignite or the first year or two profit ? Definitely Not lifestyle company 🤔 now apart from City obviously ,can anyone honestly say they can’t see this happening, and then explain why I’ve been very clear why I believe 100% this will occur , City gone for the your post rubbish argument 🤣 I would love to see an actual reason on why I might be wrong?
Not really interested in your reply as it’s the same regurgitated bile.
Amtech.... You ask "who is explaining?" ...." Weed isn't".
In simplest terms I can only express that I don't feel any need to explain.
Try a reply from me City instead, not in stone ,listed in companies house🤔
Party is irrelevant really ,when you look at significant people and other director of ignite ( only 2 it won’t take long ) in relation to MOS board of directors, one search on company house , it’s a good job the RNS stated in regard in keeping ignite on the vote didn’t include ME to ensure shareholder value 🤔🤔🤣🫣🤣 definitely not lifestyle
Amtech - really ?
Okay so give us your take on it all for everyone for all to see and something you will will stand by so when it all comes to pass it’s there in stone ?
Is that all that you have Lothbury ? - a shareholder with 300m shares with the experience he has in esports, gaming and selling companies takes the time and expense to go to Mexico and then agrees to go on the board after the visit ?
Are you for real ? - I thought you had experience in the corporate market and city ? Have a word with yourself and look at what you have just said, you are embarrassing yourself.
The problem City is that you can’t refute the extensive evidence that Lost Money has posted. Your reply was about “stock-basking”. Why don’t you provide factual evidence to counter Lost Money’s claims and the new NonExec DID NOT attend the party? Did the NonExec ever publish on this BB?
Who’s explaining City, you haven’t, Weed hasn’t
Couple of pieces of work Amtech and Lost Money when people are actually trying to explain things and provide rational explanations - never mind all that lets continue to stick the knife in !
And to think no-one stock bashes on here ! 😂
Same old weed ‘only need x amount of that market’ has been used time and time again only to end in failure. I wouldn’t fall for that old chestnut. Wonder when Lord City is joining the board with his side company recouping his investment?
Toffee are you still watching waiting for smaller spread or pre launch advertising to start on Bet ? Assuming it does
It’s not what’s done ,it’s the way it’s been done .I really won’t list all of it again but here is just one example of many .silver you say Krunch was essential,let’s say I agree but you see no problem in paying 720k for 51% of a company that lost 85k( let’s ignore the 700 k for the 49%) ,so Mos had control and reduced overheads to discover 18 months later the outgoing costs and charges had continued to ignite ME having partnership holdings in both , and Mos is paying for rent and Heroes site maintenance 🤷🏼♂️ to ignite, really site maintenance ,and you honestly don’t see why “as city says no business man” sees this as prime example of lifestyle company, and the fact it also appeared to be kept quiet,to the extent big investors on this very BB claiming no links between ignite/mos/ME by giving other names … and you can’t see why some have trust issues, welcome back toffee again , are you still waiting for spread to reduce or pre launch advertising to start for BET , assuming that occurs. City the party would have cost more than the revenue from Bitso or the zero NFT from artist , hence the biggest benefit to Mos/ME was a party (I won’t mention our new director also enjoyed it)
Here is some reading around Mexico and betting. To save anyone leg work. From the partner that owns approx 10% of MOS. Released today.
Mexico: the New iGaming Giant in Latin America?
https://www.watechnology.com/news/mexico-the-new-igaming-giant-in-latin-america
Amtech. - you point out that there are lots and lots of betting companies and competition, and ask the question re what sets MOS apart?
When you say MOS I assume that refers to EstadioBET? While I do believe there are things that give EstadioBET an edge, I also believe that there doesn't need to be anything that sets EstadioBET apart at all. It just has to grab a few percent of the overall Mexican gambling market. There is room for competition. Especially as the Mexican gambling market is growing.
Just my ramblings
Thought you would have researched that Amtech - i'll pass on that one given that i will only be accused of ramping.
Lots and lots of betting companies and competition in Mexico City, what sets MOS apart? No threats to have me thrown off the board like last time eh
...3m @ .445 - will show as a sell as just below mid price.
Slightly larger holding now than originally planned however I see this as a genuine multi bagger if all goes to plan.
Silversprings: agree.
Well said Citytilidie. A great summary of the story to date. I think most would actually struggle to list companies that have done particularly well over the last few years - either in terms of share price or actually making progress. There was one particular company today that announced a second placing after they announced one yesterday and I read that RNS wondering where the hell the millions and millions are going. I appreciate longer term shareholders that don't understand the company as well as some will be annoyed but I think it is unfair to say that they are not progressing (you explain it much better).
Thanks Siversprings - you put it a lot more eloquently than i can.
I am not here to lock horns with anyone purely trying to explain what the company are building and why.
I am not having a go at anyone Scotty I am merely saying that people aren't looking deep enough into what the company are doing and will attribute any of the SP decline to the market in general.
As for the jollies comment - how about this from Lost Money.
Look the Bitso deal ensured ME got a good party in Mexico out of it so it’s fine🤣 and that deal for the arts NFT and look how well that’s doing ,🤫
It’s a difficult one because the performance of the SP has been undeniably poor to date, and individually all the ventures haven’t worked as stand alone concepts so far.
But…. The only way the company even has this latest opportunity is because of the acquisitions of Krunch, the acquisition of livescores, the NFT relationships with owners of Necaxa and Atlante, the partnership with Bitso, the development put into the software platform by MOS, none of it is wasted if this new venture works and in fact if the new venture works it will be precisely because of all these components that MOS have built. Quite simply why would any of these companies partner with MOS for BET if it was offering nothing? Its data platform is still extremely valuable to them.
It’s now or never though as eventually the progress has to translate to revenue and value.
To be honest the one in the greenbox who I filtered months ago should have been banned long before guzzler. Those who read at the time his disgusting, vile and sub intelligent bile filled comments will know what I mean. How he avoided a permanent ban I will never know.
Right on cue, here he is, having a go at investors once more. May I remind him, his fellow members of the MOS echo chamber has told him time and time again to stay away from this bulletin board but he just cannot help himself, he thrives on confrontation.
To insinuate all this has been done to facilitate " jollies " line the BOD's pocket - Just looked through the thread City but cannot see where anybody has posted this, except for you that is.