Member Info for Lothbury

Well, I suppose it’s “Krunch” time… 🤓

“…buy and come back in 2 years time…” when you will have been diluted out of sight and not a profit to smile about.. I suspect the rump will have been “taken over” by the Mexicans et al for 1 Peso…

Pharamhall : RNS signing off requirements.

No — not every single RNS needs formal NOMAD sign-off, but all material/non-routine announcements must be reviewed and approved; only routine, low-risk items may be released without prior review if the NOMAD is satisfied the directors are competent.

It’s a race to the 31st December (which could have post Balance Sheet events) to either show a good set of numbers and an underpinned future growth or “going nowhere fast unless they contour up another wheeze” as post WC the opportunity and impetus will have wained beyond saving.

When are they going to stop fleecing us for working capital and produce a profit with a Going Concern Statement… “ also believe that GANA would have liked to have raised more cash today, but only raised sufficient to cover immediate working capital needs to protect against dilution, with the aim of some upcoming positive announcements that boost the share price so that the next raise …”?

Same old :same old … let’s see how much we can raise without a Trading Statement… and what does this mean in real terms “ use the proceeds of the Fundraise to increase spending on a number of key projects that we believe will energise our growth further.…”? What growth? Energise (I thought that was a battery)…! Is this just advertising money or upgrade on flights? Can we please have some “real” tangible news that impacts the bottom line and SP and a detailed trading statement; such as moving out from using their expensive 12, Hay Hill, Berkeley Square, which was “built as a Private Members Club”

Perhaps long standing shareholders and those with better knowledge than the ordinary investor realise that the much hyped World Cup is not going to perform, as ramped, and wonder where and if there he a future after the WC.

Well said `S7VENTrading’ … 216% increase in the SP to reach normality before seeing an roi in ‘real terms’. I asked, a number of months ago, what the strategy was after the World Cup… and the replies treated my question as if I was a fool and novice for even questioning the amazing talented Board. So.. Citi amongst others.. what is the strategy after the WC (World cup not Water Closet…!) and where in the stratosphere is the SP, in your humble opinions, going to reach in the next 12 months?

Apologies Amtech.. I thought you’d had a good source for this info. It seems the SP may have reached the “floor” : a base price at which the sellers retreat as it’s too low.

Good news Amtech.. can you provide some independent substance to your comment please / or is this just “hearsay” with lashings of hope?

£2,600 nearly covers a BA Premium Economy return to Mexico.. Let’s have an RNS; just for the fun of reading yet another load of tosh….

Good morning Galley13. I invested with lots of hope. I’m not “anti”… just being realistic. Interestingly, Citi made some great SP predictions and I offered him a 12 month “Put & Call” option at a 30% discount. Not a whimper … I do wonder if the SP rampers are those with “donated” shares wanting to squeeze every last penny before the market for buyers dries up? I hope I am very wrong with my “concerns”, but I’ve seen this type of activity before…

“Own goal” I fear… Yellow card & into the Sin Bin.

Olé, no update, no financial word,

Caramba—silence makes the curve sink hard!

No RNS to steady or defend,

From current levels straight down it will bend,

To .015p when next week comes to end.

Morning Galley13. My entry price is irrelevant… it’s the exit price I’m interested in and in constant hope of the magnificent SP that many have been alluding to over the last 2 years.

Good morning “Onwardsandup”. At the start of the week you commented that you hoped the SP to be 0.5 by today. It’s struggling at 0.2. What are your thoughts for next week … ..0. 17 by Wednesday?

Good morning Arco. He’s are some reasons why Portfolio Managers won’t touch Gana Sharma with a “Taco”..

• Micro-cap, extreme illiquidity & massive dilution risk; constantly loss-making.

• Recent reverse takeover, weak governance, poor disclosures; fails institutional eligibility rules.

• High volatility, tiny free float; breaches fund mandates/risk limits.

• Regarded as speculative, unfit for regulated portfolios.

Goodness gracious me .. .021 and it’s not even Monday..!!

“Onwards…” I completely agree with your views. Lots of hot air coming out of Mexico but nothing of substance that underpins a share price. Sooner or later they will run out of meaningless RNS and publish reality.

And back to o.21 on Monday…