London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
WiseOwl. You are regularly posting on so many other bb’s you are not invested in and cross ramping Matd.
You sneer at others regularly.
Why is the SP now under 3p and you are still doing this?
It’s down 27% in the last month. You suckered so many in to let you out?
None of us really know who others are on these BBs, or whose looking in.
The question we should really be asking is does Mrs Buck like shoes?
A fine question that Bob :-)
Speaking of Shoe(s)... and seeing finwittraders post below:
Does Mr Buck's mate WOS like - Sneaky - Sneakers more than Shoe(s), is a question that plays on my mind, Sirs :-)
Focus on INVESTMENT!
People lose money in Market because they forget this & focus on gossip & other silliness.
Mr Michu - answer to your Q (post 13:57) straightforward if you listen to Mr Buck's interviews & understand development strategy with key player like DQE.
Like I say if you Focus on INVESTMENT & less from sillly traders all become much more clear.
Buy or Not (do what you want) but lot will regret selling last few days am sure.
My Research is my OWN after last try to block my acct by someone here but have had more Intel & very confident for next week.
🦉
Traders / Sneakies
Ignore - Filter my post. It is not for you! 🦉
Owl was not here and you guys didn't have anything to say but picking on him!
At least he is positive on his investment to say the least.
Owl, keep up your great job.
Mrs Buck is a member , maybe could tell us 😂 GLA
The truth is no one knows if this is going up or down tomorrow let alone next week or next month.
You need to have real steel ones to stay and keep on the ride here.
News will come when it comes.
GLA
“but have had more Intel & very confident for next week.”
ANOTHER prediction?! I’m sure you said this week would be the week? Or was it last month?
WOS - 2.9p.
I'll second that Hamm.. WOS represents the Bulls here far far better than any other.. he is VERY well researched / 'informed' on Matd..
The bulls, and indeed this board generally, would miss his posting massively if he stopped participating here.. imho
Michu - would we miss it, really?! It’s repetitive, inane nonsense that might make some nervous investors here feel better. But ultimately, he has been wrong 99% of the time, and just a crappy personality with it, criticising anyone who dares to even have a balanced view on MATD.
Nicetomichu, i totally agree ref WOS, he was off the board for a couple of days recently and there was nothing posted of any substance here whatsoever by the posters who are always over critical of him. They had nothing of worth to post. There has also been a certain poster on here who blatantly has tried to get WOS banned, threatening and posting BS just because WOS doesn't follow his trading strategy, That person ought to be ashamed and is far worse than WOS will ever be.
I will add that as much as i appreciate his positivity and info that he posts and his research, i do not agree going onto other BB's to either sl*g off another share or post ref MATD. That i believe is a step too far. Ref the COPL it's not good to hear if investors have lost money, as we are all here ultimately to make money, so WOS be respectful and leave it to the MATD BB, but continue posting MATD referenced news and its potential
So Dozz accussing UK Ambassador of giving market sensitive information is fine with you?
Prof, i don't think you should be posting anything about anyone with the BS IP address stuff you came out with. That worked out well at the end of Jan. Threatening people who don't agree with your agenda. Basically all you have tried to do is take control of this board for your own narrative. You have the option of filtering WOS as others have, but you won't. All you want to do is silence him with threats, so hopefully he will go away. You don't like his positivity as it goes against what you want to see on here. He has posted more info on here on what's happening in Mongolia whether it is related directly to Matad or not in one day than you have in all the time you have been on here.
Dozzawba- I have a lot of time for you and your posts, but you have suggested to WOS on multiple occasions he not go cross board ramping or sl4gging off their stocks, but still he does. He goes too far. It’s time for LSE to ban him. In fact, it’s well overdue.
As for MATD, it drags on endlessly. Hopefully it ends well. But in all seriousness, if we do get some positive news and the SP rerates, I’ll be off. The blatant corruption and bureaucracy is too much.
Dozz simple yes or no
Is it Ok to accuse a UK Ambassador over and over again of giving your material inside information on a public forum?
We all know moderation sucks here so hé will not be banned ... he generates traffic....advertising...more important than morals
Prof, to be honest I don't really give one iota about the Ambassador and what WOS has said, I have been in touch with both Fiona Blyth and Philip Malone the previous Ambassador and they are both a waste of space. On another point as for FTI they are also useless and whatever request or info you ask of them they always come back with the same corporate Bollx reply. So as I have said ref WOS all you have to do is filter him. It is that easy or is there a reason why you won't filter him ?
Researchandhold said //BP is like a stain on humanity//
I don' want anyone banned - let them make complete fools of themselves. It's funny!
Doc, I do believe there should be a warning, banning I'm not sure. Personally as I said I really don't like it, it's not fair to other honest investors. It's out of order.
As.for Matad, as we all know the potential is huge, but as I have always said the treatment of private investors by Buck with regards his lack of communication is disgraceful. If the Finance Department has paid the governor then this SHOULD of been RNS'd. This would of given the SP a boost. We have been told about 2 new licences being granted, why hasn't this been RNS'd and confirmed where the licences/blocks are. That's all they need to say. Also renewable energy, same again little snippets of info, but no "meat on the bones".
Again I say IMO Buck's communication is a disgrace. I have emailed PM Admin, Buck himself and the chair lady/CEO of Petrovis. Still waiting for a reply. Communication NOT !!!
Prof - 'We all know moderation sucks here so hé will not be banned ... he generates traffic....advertising...more important than morals'
You do realise you've posted that on a forum predominantly used by traders and gamblers? LSE ultimately want to make money from the site, and the majority of those using the site are here to make money in one way or another. Morals rarely comes in to it, and on the occasions it does its not usually at the expense of the all important MONEY. LSE shouldn't have to pander to all the differences of opinion or spats on all the multitude of boards.
If anyone is going to take great offence to anything another nobody posts, they probably shouldn't be here.
And if anyone is going to be greatly influenced by anything another nobody posts here, at lease without doing their own due diligence, then they probably shouldn't be investing.
You, me, WOS and everyone else, we should be free to express what we want (within the realms of law) We're all grown up enough to choose what we do and don't read, and how we invest our money, and accept the consequences of those decisions.
Gloating about how much we make or taking apparent joy in others losses however, we can all agree that they are just big t!ts, but not the kind I like.
Bob, great post and probably the most sensible post for a long time. As you said everyone is free to express what they want to. and if you don't like it or that person posting then don't read it and also LSE has given everyone the option of they don't like it - you just FILTER
Thanks, I try and have my moments! I don't post much, but do keep an eye on the boards. There are some great posters out there that share useful information and links. Equally there are some prize tools. You just need to learn how to filter out the noise and now whats relevant and honest. I never use the filter button - find it strangely therapeutic to see even the eejits posts. Always lifts my mood to know I'm not one of them. (That last statement is obviously my own point of view, and others may differ)