focusIR May 2024 Investor Webinar: Blue Whale, Kavango, Taseko Mines & CQS Natural Resources. Catch up with the webinar here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
No ones taking the bait Snorlax.
Snorlax. Welcome to the Copl board. Good of you to visit with your wisdom.
Is it a common practice of yours to attempt to slander members of the Bar and registered Law society practitioners?
Pretty brave move.
Hope your digital footprint is secure?
Have you watched the Zoom presentation Snortax? If so, Was Michael Cotter lying about retrieving millions of pounds for Arch Cru, Keydata and ARCK investors? Can you show proof of folk disgruntled with Michael Cotter's work with these three investments and groups?
Flightrisk makes a good point, modern day scams are so intricate, tailored in fact to a scenario. For example, shareholders lose masses amounts of money.. Someone comes along promising a lawsuit with possibility of making a return, promises no win no fee but wait! We need a "sign up fee" to get the ball rolling. How long before the next. If something like this ever made it to court you'd be looking 6 figures in costs. Is someone really doing that for free. If I were a betting man I'd say this is someone's attempt at praying on the desperate to recoup their own loses.
Anybody remember PlaiceFish who got exposed and disappeared once it become knowledge that his uncle was serving time for his position in a busted paedophile ring?
The same poster tried to infiltrate TG groups and then set up his own with 14 members but only Andi was allowed to speak in that group. All others were muted…
I have not listed all dates of trades only the first one and total £loss - I could prove if need be at a later date 😮
Well I have just stated date if first buy, multiple buy and sell trades, total amount of buy value and total sell value. Resulting in total loss of X£'s. And also stated how many shares holding now ( nil £ value included in total £loss)
Don't know if this is right but that is what I have done.
H
🤔😮👍
Yes,agreed. Over a six year period I gradually built up a moderate position. Most of the shares were purchased at much higher prices but I'm darned if I can produce every amount/price over such a long period. I can however produce my current statement which shows number of shares and average price. That should be enough proof of my current holding details.I should imagine I'm not alone.
I have asked the same question, but have not received any answers. I am with IG and have bought and sold and IG does not make it easy to give dates. I cannot see how the date is going to cause issues, but happy to be corrected
I have been out of action for a few weeks but have the mail from M Cotter.....can I ask, is it just a question of filling out the form, sign it and send it too the address and it needs to be done by 21st?
Also, do you have to note all buys and sells for how long back?
This will have been asked loads but I need to get a move on if I want to join🤦♂️
Thanks Ryan for the ksvadvisory link, very interesting developments going on behind the scenes, hopefully to our benefit, and also for highlighting something more important than the rantings of a flightrisk!
Thanks for your message Fin, I;n in and have sent the proforma.
Thanks Ryan. I don't want to comment on Mr Justice Yamauchi's decision or whether proceedings were dealt with correctly. CAG will be presenting opinion and evidence to Michael Cotter and have already done so in relation to various parties and matters.
There were no bidders because the sisp process was far too short and was rushed through to prevent bids. Bp are saying there were only 8 days from the start of the sisp until the loi cut off date. Far too short for anyone to make an informed decision. Also the judge seems to have made some errors.
There could be many reasons for that. I would not like to comment at this stage Steve because I do not want to impinge on the Class Action case. There is plenty to say but this will be for Michael Cotter.
But did BP not even register an interest to make an offer?
There was no auction because there were no bidders.
That is my understanding too. Also, Summit had a lien on COPLA assets, BP did not. BP's Court submission seemed opportunistic, this latest action does too. We will have to see. Meanwhile, I'm proceeding with MC. Irrespective of the BP outcome, MC has targets to pursue on our behalf. I'd like him to get going ASAP.
I'm no expert but the transcript is long but the way I read it BP were to late in challenging and stated the outcome no change and is binding. Hopefully some can read this and clarify. I may have read this wrong and would love this to be challenged as I'm down 6 digits+
Orchard
Good find Ryan. Justice Yamauchi stated there was no right of appeal which was acknowledged by Counsel. What happens next following this move from BP will be interesting. Personally, I want MC and his team to get going as soon as possible so I won't be delaying things.
Can’t believe no one has posted anything about this yet. BP looking to appeal the AVO link below look under motion materials filed on the 14th May.
https://www.ksvadvisory.com/experience/case/canadian-overseas-petroleum
As soon the AVO was granted the class action with Mr Cotter started to gain traction. Is there any merit in waiting a few weeks to see what happens with the appeal before we start asking everyone for payment. Do we have timelines that we need to keep ? This doesn’t seem as though it’s cut and dry just yet ?
A brand new member pops up on LSE. Looks at all the thousands of interesting chat rooms, then decides that the ONLY share worth talking about is COPL, a share that’s even suspended. Nothing constructive to say, just throw some pompous derision at a group of SHs trying to do the right thing. By pure coincidence, there’s a sign up deadline in two days time.
Now, if there’s no actual agenda a play here, and this is genuinely the the most interesting thing they can find to do on a Sunday afternoon, well you’d have to conclude that someone has a very, very sad life indeed. Just laughable.
"I'm writing a paper on finance vs emotion", stupidest post of the day, never heard such rubbish, Fish even you have outdone yourself.
Someone does not want us to progress this Class Action.
I don't understand what you are 'saying'. Please explain.
That's a fair chunk rodney, around 40% of the 150k that all shareholders are paying for 'action'
Remeber if everyone had 1p taken from their bank account, no one would question , but the person collecting all those pennies would see losses here recovered very quickly.
Just saying.
The £60,000 has been a sunk cost for many months now. CAG is committed to achieve a fair outcome for all shareholders. The definition of this does not merely refer to money, it relates to holding to account the actions of various parties. The actions that have got us to the position we are in now.