Scancell founder says the company is ready to commercialise novel medicines to counteract cancer. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Its all manipulation is it still, tradey2.
That records sooooo old now its worn right out
Like back to when this wasn't a penny stock
650 incoming tho
Tradey aka BFD & Jezza
Prehaps pen a letter then being it's your day job.
Never heard such a whinning toddler daily complain about the so called corrupt market.
Laughable
Every board you whine about mm's
Why?
Because you need an excuse for your own daft purchases that tank.
Always one
Daytrade don't you think you have embarrassed yourself enough for one day.
Next day delivery to one zip code, dear me, if it wasn't so sad it would be even funnier.
Let's hope you reach emotional maturity before your state pension although somehow I doubt it.
It's strange the whole not so fab four feel the need to swamp the board every time one of you makes a fool of themselves. Or is it themself, who knows.
It’s the same idiot x4
Wow 1.2m shares traded in trading hours and then a half million UT, it is beyond stupid
About as believable as you only using one username...
"cool"....
Welll go check it out then Boasty.
Its all there on the board from the man himself for you to read up on.
Topped up yet with that £50k?
"Wow 1.2m shares traded in trading hours and then a half million UT, it is beyond stupid"
OMG you are STILL not banging that old manipulation drum are you.
Any ideas on just how deluded it makes you sound, trotting out the same excuse each and every day, yawwwwwn.
So desperate for the last word.... Explains the 4am posts.
Be better if people stuck to talking about boohoo rather than trips to the fake District.
"If boohoo don't report an improvement in this same period then I'm afraid John Lyttles employment has reached the end of the road...."
Not sounding to confident about the likely prospects then. Penny dropping?
Although i do think your posts A bit harsh there boasty about poor John, i didnt realise you had the power to control his employment?
Or buying - despite the low price.
SPK the volume of shares traded here has never been so low as in the past couple of months. Current volumes are less than half what they were last year on average and we have probably seen four of the five lowest volume days ever in the last couple of months. I've not checked, but today could well be a new record low.
There is plenty of evidence that the volume goes up significantly when the sp does and there is no market now at these levels. Yet the MMs continue to do the same thing day after day.
There is only one reason I can think of why they do it and it's certainly not to create a market
Hexam if you saw a share being held in a tight range, with a slight down trend and you looked at the price action and volume, would you buy if you were a trader?
I certainly wouldn't
Same MO light volume during the day then a sprint to 34p at the bell then a 1-2% drop in the UT where the auction starts at 34+ and ends up mid 33s….Paul Daniels could do what these jokers do!
I buy shares on whether I think they present value based on the quality and/or potential of the business versus its current price - not some psychobabble about what MMs may or may not be up to. So if (big if) they are playing such games then I wouldn’t be fooled by them and in it fact it would increase my chances of buying as it moves more into what I consider bargain territory.
It seems then that you are not one of the ones averaging down/topping up at these low prices. Oddly enough - I was :-)
I also never, ever look at volume. Irrelevant as far as I’m concerned other than to show relative interest or apathy in a stock. If there is any news/rumour of news then interest will rise sharply and so will volumes - regardless of that being good news (which will drive the price up) or bad news (which will drive the price down).
Why MMs would hold a price down anyway to kill volume seems strange to me as volume is mainly what drives their income.
“There's no market being created Hexam that's the point.”
Why are they shooting themselves in the foot? It would be like BOOHOO stopping all marketing spend or doing anything else knowingly and deliberately to reduce sales (unless for the benefit of profitability such as small price increases perhaps or charging for returns).
interesting book... sounds like it was written by a certain person here and the person reviewing it hits the nail on the head describing our buddy here.....
i'm still of the opinion he has been absolutely battered here and projects it onto other people here to try and feel better... sad but true.... hopefully he makes "a cool one million"...
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/1561703
without a doubt one of the worst books i have ever read. the narrator is a pretentious ******* with zero redeeming qualities. the whole "story" is 95% him complaining about how horrible his life is while the other 5% is how horrible he was treated by the girl he loves (and by love i mean obsesses over, thinks about hurting her, and then condemns her for doing the same thing to him that he's done to countless women before with very little remorse). comparing this book to catcher in the rye and lolita is insulting to both of those books. i'm worried about the impressionable young adults who will pick up this book and think that this is a story of love and redemption. spoiler alert: it isn't
Hexam in that case you must be just about the only trader who doesn't look at range and volume.
Most traders, and Aim is massively skewed to traders, have a window of a few days or weeks at most.
I don't trade here, I trade where there is far more volatility, and there are many such stocks
Spk - Fair enough, I can see how a day-trader looks at other things unrelated to the business itself (as that then becomes largely irrelevant of course) but I’m not one. I’m basically a LTH though that includes swing trading within that.
On why MMs are stifling trade I guess that’s where we differ as my starting point is that they are NOT stifling trade - it kills their own revenue. In my view it is simply a stock at the moment that there is not a lot of interest in and MMs seem pretty powerless to create it when it just doesn’t exist. They could of course try by increasing or decreasing stock sharply in price but the big risk for them is that they either end up with too much unwanted stock themselves (if go high) which they then have to sell at a loss or it dries up trade even further (if they go low) as no-one is willing to sell to them at such low prices - as you can tell, I’m not a great believer in the ‘tree-shake’ theory.
Hexam your hypothesis only holds true if margin volume is the market makers sole potential source of income from an equity.
By and large it isn't
I'm not sure what all the fuss is about! BOO is currently moving sideways (consolidating) with an approximate swing high to low of 6.0% & price has been moving within a short term range since 16th April. This is normal (review the MNG chart & you'll see MNG price has been in a range since 17th April). A catalyst (news event) will no doubt move price one way or the other & in the meantime the range will be traded.
The Weekly chart shows that BOO has been in a range of sorts since June 2023 & price has tried to move out of the range on two occasions without success. The Weekly chart indicates the 33 level is being heavily defended & has been since September 2022.
So the upshot of the rampers reasoning is its all "manipulation"
Heard this tosh more times than a certain leader apparantly stopping the boats, from the usual suspects.
There is no 'market' in this stock because nobody wants to sell any and nobody wants to buy it. Its really very simple and its surprising that all the (supposed) company 'experts' on here are still ignoring this fact, preferring half baked conspiracy theories instead.
Presumably the likes of Umar, Kamani, Fraser etc, who collectively hold a big chunk, are sitting still and wont sell as it sends the wrong message. a sell will clearly erode yet more confidence in this turkey and lets be honest there is none left after its 92% sp plunge, deluge of poor pr, bubble popping and multiple scandals. The stock market 'darling' BOo is no more.
So a significant amount of stock is held in the hands of 'enforced holders'. Then there are all the Pi's and other corporates that hold stock. They are, likely, sitting on large losses - like the deluded 'manipulation calling' rampers on here, so reluctant to sell out and recieve just the remaining crumbs of their investment back. They are, with exception of the desparate £50k top up queen on here, also reluctant to sink more capital into the same prospectless money sapping hole (and who would blame them) as they, in the main, dont see this situation that BOo finds itself in recovering to anything like the heady days, so rightly dont want to bung in more cash. There are clearly far far better prospects elsewhere - even safe bank accounts.
So, a significant amount of major investors cannot sell as it will crater the price further, and they also dont seem will8ng to buy any more either. And the further set of lower holding investors dont want to sell, at possibly a huge financial loss, so prefer the 'sh17 or bust' hold in hope view and wont commit more capital either.
Perfect storm thats completely destroyed any confidence in this as an investment moving forwards - the BOd screwed up with all the long continuing months of total radio silence and missed the oppo to change the ships course.
Looking forward to the 8th, hopefully they will reveal whats been spent of the RCF, but if those figures are viewed as poor then this be in trouble.
What a load of long winded garbage, why do you waste your time writing this nonsense.
The likes of Frasers, Kamani's and II's buy for the long term, so what evidence do you have that any large investor here is "an enforced holder" who "can't sell because it would give the wrong message".
Let's take Frasers as a simple example. They have bought more than a fifth of the company at an average in the low to mid thirties. Nobody builds this kind of stake with an intention to sell in the short term, because they know it would be an impossibility. They have also gone on record as saying their strategy will become clear over time. So in what way are they an enforced holder daytrade? Let's have your explanation, I'm sure it will be even more embarrassing than yesterday
The answer is absolutely none, it's just your usual abusive and argumentative rubbish.
I thought you couldn't possibly embarrass yourself more than you did yesterday, but congratulations you have managed it.