GreenRoc Accelerates their World Class Project to Production as Early as 2028. Watch the full video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Is one month overdue on Monday (expected 'end of April').
Timeline announced in the March 21st RNS when presumably the company had good knowledge of when the data would be submitted and when the Safety Committee would be meeting to discuss.
So presumably submitted and discussed by now? And yet no update?
Any thoughts?
Seeking clarification on the data?
A problem or concern?
Committee members unavailable due to holiday commitments?
Incompetence on Avacta's part?
Avacta just can't be bothered to update its Shareholders?
Or maybe, with the cash runway putting them in a strong position there are conversations ongoing with BP, FDA, and others.
Wanting to include any 2 week data into the mix.
Possible big news all at once..
But you just keep pushing a negative viewpoint despite all the real clinical evidence to the contrary... Ho Hum!
Sorry Welsh, and I thought I'd included all the most likely scenarios!
So they're negotiating a big deal Welsh.
A good reason to announce excellent data then to lure a counter bid/deal?
It's this kind of lack of objectivity about the nature of pharmaceutical development and drug trials that I find so comical.
*****yawn****
8If you bought shares with your own cash you want the SP to go up so will always be drawn to a positive outlook.
If you're shorting you want the SP to tumble so will push a negative agenda.
If you work for a company who receives revenue or pays commission on ad clicks you will want to see lots of scrolling up and down so will push argumentative dialogue and engagement.
Take your pick...p
T
And some might be in the middle or on the sidelines trying to weigh the risks and benefits.
So nice not just to hear about the imminent 'big deal'?
Posting last night then first thing this morning have you got a problem in a share you are not in.
βIs one month overdue on Monday (expected 'end of April').β
20 days now a month FFS trolls will try anything.
Only if you choose to define the 'end of April' as ten minutes to Midnight on April 30th, which you clearly do Energy (obviously!)
I'll post again then at 23.50 on March 30th?
Or being pedantic would you insist that the post has no relevance until 23.50 on May 31st or even 00.01 on 1.6.24.
And if you defined the 'end of April' as the last week of April?
They are not overdue...read the statement...
All reliant on a third party...and they said it was anticipated.
They NEVER said they will RNS at end of April...if they did they would be late...they didn't so they're not.
Get over it guys...stop going over it time and time again...
Bella, exactly good post. π―π
It's either delayed because they didn't submit the trial data on time, which wouldn't surprise me.
They got the likely date of the Safety Committee meeting wrong.
Or the Safety Committee felt unable approve the start of Cohort two on the data provided, for whatever reason.
Or it's passed and they're moving on to Cohort 2 and just haven't bothered to tell the Shareholders. We know however that they thought not informing Shareholders about the start of Cohort 1 was 'a mistake'.
So surely they wouldn't do that again?
No news is good news just as itβs always been
They are too busy just getting on with the job
They are under an NDA and a 40 day blackout
They are all at ASCO
All Thorn has said is reasonable and I would also add that if you are going to quote a date (anticipated or not), then there was a reason to do that. It means, to me, therefore there must have been some significance to AVCT to mention it in the first place.
It then follows that they should update, maybe just through X , what the current situation is and why it is what it is.
That's all, no making a crisis out of a drama, but when a company has a track record for missing dates and then when news does not follow it has always transpired to be bad news, and add in that the CEO has been replaced, it is obvious that a more clear update would confirm maybe, that things have changed on the coms front given that that has always been a criticism from shareholders in the past.
So not to do any sort of update, only fuels the rumour mill.
Its unnecessary, imo.
Is Thorn Wyndrum and Wyndrum Thorn.
You both are pathetic individuals with incessant facts that most of the time are your assumptions and opinions.
Wyndrum backs heads or tails all the time.
Thorn is just moronic in is shorting parody attempt to try as a non-shareholder to pull Avacta to pieces.
Don't care for either of them and probably the type of persons up their own rses.
They both have an explicit agenda and I do not get why they are still on this board.
Dossers.
Thorn wrote....
And some might be in the middle or on the sidelines trying to weigh the risks and benefits.
So nice not just to hear about the imminent 'big deal'?
-------------------------------+
Who gives a damn about your opinion?
Nobody dosser