Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Yes simply trolling. You can’t see what we’ve written but you’re certain that the points we’re making about PreCision, points you’ve made yourself are simply trolling for a reaction from a poster who isn’t invested. How funny. What a couple of absolute…..
Just filter wynbore he's a class A internet troll.
Oh for Gods sake, make you mind up Mowzer, do you think I influence people on here or not with your comment " I think it would be arrogant of a poster on an anonymous BB and have expectations the majority of readers/posters who are researched LTH's to believe their 'advice' or 'warnings'.
Its not me that says that.. That is apparently my crime! its you that brought up my intentions suggestion they were not good!
The SP rose on the back of expected breakthrough on the LFT getting approval and selling in vast numbers. If that had happened I would not have sold !!! However I did sell when it was clearer to me that it was not going to happen or happen in sufficient quantity to justify the SP!
How many times do we have to go around this.
I was right, others were wrong . Whether I was right by luck or judgement is irrelevant. I happened to have called it right on the way up and the way down.
I am hardly unique in stock picking and getting some right and have never purported to be anything other than a trader who spends more time looking at charts than " research"
There was no 20/20 hindsight as I called it all before the events happened and I don't get all my calls right but then again, I have never, ever said I have, have I?
You put words in my mouth that I never said simply to bolster a false image you have invented of me.
Anyone who knows about TA and god knows I have banged on about here enough, knows you also run with levels that if the SP falls to or below you get out so as to preserve capital so you can benefit from your wins and mitigate the losses. Why did you not mention that?
Why have you not mentioned AGL, where so far my calls have been correct, or SYN, or ADV?
Anyway, I feel i have clearly, logically, patiently rebutted every single point you have made and you still seem not to accept anything I say, in which case your mind is closed and made up.
I suggest you do not use that approach in your future investments.
Goodbye
shows a lack of understanding of who is reading or a disregard for who is reading. I'm sure you don't care really...
(apologies I didn't finish my last post - but I won't post again on this matter - I think I have been fairly civil though - throughout)
Seriously Wyndrum had Avacta not had delays and had government approvals and we were at £5 right now would you be patting yourself on the back right now? I expect so - you left enough positivity in your posts to get out of jail free. Hindsight is 20/20 and had I listened to you on EVE or NDN on HE1 I'd be more in the hole. You are not a messiah and investments do go down as well as up - a balanced portfolio is the solution there, and your audience/target market here is not full of traders, so they are comfortable with that.
'Know your customer' comes to mind. I think it would be arrogant of a poster on an anonymous BB and have expectations the majority of readers/posters who are researched LTH's to believe their 'advice' or 'warnings'. To expect civility from this group (which clear is the main market presenting itself in the form of posts)
Mowzer, I thought I was done here but when you say:
"I think if you truly have a rational mind with truly good intentions, then you could step back and see the bigger picture here and what this BB represents, the type of posters that come here, what each are looking to take away or influence."
So I can't express my forward thinking because most posters here only want to hear the positive side of AVCT?
Investments go down as well as up. All have a risk attached to them. The majority of posts here extol the upside and not only don't acknowledger the potential risks but seek to personally rubbish the poster(s) who highlight these risks.
Every investor who has played this game for any length of time has at some time over committed on a "sure fire" stock only to end up with a big loss, either realised or on paper.
So you question my "good intentions" yet my warnings, had they been heeded would have saved many here many £1000's. Is that not good enough for you?
But truly I am done here.
Like it or not in a forum (public or otherwise) the readers are a jury - deciding on who to 'believe' Jury's look at motivation if there is doubt on evidence presented (opinions in this case). I think if you truly have a rational mind with truly good intentions, then you could step back and see the bigger picture here and what this BB represents, the type of posters that come here, what each are looking to take away or influence. I don't really care about you posting here or the content. Nor do I care about the ramping. I don't think it makes much difference either (we can agree there). I just cannot accept that it is innocent (on balance) having taken a step back and considered motivation for the persistence applied (not just referring to you btw).
I do think some of the bashing particularly on Twitter is callous, libelous, and stemming from very clear motivations. It is very likely coordinated, as this kind of focus would be futile for a single individual. For clarity, I'm not trying to match posters here with twitter, but it is not unreasonable to expect some overlap.
Best wishes to geniune investors.
Mowzer, I have explained fully my motives and position. You still want to believe something else about me.
Thats fine, Just for the record I am not looking for "respect". I can't keep saying that I don't believe my opinions affect the SP, you choose to believe I am bashing when all i keep repeating is my disappointment in the LFT, which is both vindicated and factual
I have posted nothing, absolutely nothing, to justify the relentless trolling and personal abuse that has followed my comments. The fact that you feel they are justified says more about you than me.
Good luck with your investments, present and future.
if innocent, why ramble negatively here so frequently? It doesn't seem to provide much reward - not in the way you purport anyway. 'Reward' is something you do go on about directly and indirectly. Seems like a lot of wasted effort if we are to believe your motive is pure. Either you are the soapbox type (cutting nose off to spite face if actually invested) otherwise the motives are not pleasant. It is the latter that is driving the abuse, though I think most would take issue with both. I think if you want to talk negatively about investments to give balance on an anonymous BB then you would certainly expect criticism about motive. If you want to give your real name (and stake reputation) and talk about a company negatively then great, you might get some more respect and more respectful dialogue.
£37m of cash as at end of June 2021 with 6mth cash outflow of around £11m. However, a chunk of that cash outflow will be getting AVA6000 into clinical trials and AffiDx to a commercialised position which is now complete, that wont be an ongoing cost. So you can't look into that as a 2m per month cash burn as some would suggest.
Not to mention, post period to end June 2021, AffiDx started selling via Calibre (Aug 2021) and there was the undisclosed milestone payment from LGChem (Sept)
Been made very clear funded until 2023 EXCLUDING any revenues from LFT. I expect to see a solid balance sheet come EOY to put any "desperate Q2 2022" funding needs to bed as old Bishop/Wyndrum likes to spout!
Plenty of cash till 2023
So nothing to worry about their
Anyone any idea of Avacta’s cash remaining from the last substantial raise, or indeed their cash burn?
My "ulterior" motive Mowzer is simply to comment on AVCT as an investment as I see it. And I don't know why being right in my analysis, whether by luck or judgement, is cause for such vitriol.
My "freedom of speech" does not include being constantly personally abusive to people who do not agree with my opinions. So please don't imply its 6 of one and half a dozen of the other.
Its been a disappointing time for AVCT for the last 9-10 months regards the LFT and that is where all the focus has been so how can it be anything but discussed here.? That's not bashing, that's reality. Can none of you grasp that fundamental FACT?
Recently the focus has shifted to put more emphasis on AVA6000k as its time is now upon us.
There are shorters of AVCT and good luck to them. They took a decision when the SP was about 150p I think if memory serves, and their decision has paid off.
At some stage they will close their short and if AVCt go into a good news cycle the SP will rise from these low prices.
Its just the language here that amazes me here, "attack", "bashing" etc, it's all meant to sound so dramatic and brutal, yet all this is, is buying some stock in the expectation it rises. I don't know if some posters realise how pathetic, childish and immature they come across.
Likewise you want to assign some "motive" to what I do. Why? I just buy and eventually sell stocks I think will go up in value. And that is the long and the short of it.
If you look a my posts, all I have posted is effectively, buy when it was about 100p, it went to 275p and then I said it was starting to look like it was going to fall so i sold on the way down while keeping a core holding for the "fingers crossed" pay off of AVA600.
At some stage assuming some confirmatory good news on the trial I will increase my holding.
Meanwhile my profits from here have been working elsewhere. Bully for me, but isn't that the idea? Make some money, re-invest somewhere else?
The trouble here is that some act on here as though its a cult rather than just a boring investment BB.
(And for the record I don't do Twitter)
So the next time you get wild imaginings on my "ulterior motives" read my post through the prism of someone who simply wants to make money by buying stocks at a low price and selling them at a higher price. At least even though you may still disagree with the content you will have the satisfaction of understanding correctly what i am saying.
You either never bother to read my posts Wyndrum - or you just read what you want to hear. It isn’t all the content of your posts that I disagree with (though a good fair bit) it is the motive behind the persistence.
I’m sure you can agree there are shorters of Avacta. It that is true the there will be those wanting to manipulate…. Human nature - it is everywhere. It also stands to reason that there would be many here and in Twitter as the PI is probably the weakest hand. So, given that… who would you put money on ????? Others see this and attack. You and the other claim abuse…. That would be the case if it wasn’t for the motive…
Freedom of speech goes both ways. You can say what you like but if you get called out for bashing it is hardly surprising and given the persistence I actually feel that there is more evidence than not that there are ulterior motives.
The libel on Twitter is really quite bad (and obvious).
You literally said AVacta would never be profitable.
It’s also not 5% down is it. The UT took it from 74p to 77p so it’s currently 2p down. Not only that but for all your TA wizardry you never reference buys vs sells which are currently more buys by about 50k. To suggest this isn’t co-ordinated…..
But to also suggest you’re here to help anyone is laughable.
Mowzer I get the impression you bother to read my posts.
I have actually never bashed AVCT or AS or the AVA6000 trial, all I did was express concern for the likely disappointment for the LFT.
As for anything libellous, thats a laugh coming from some here... The things said about me Ha ha.
I said in a post at the weekend (now deleted) that (imo) I thought around the mid 70's might be a good place to buy in for the future but I thought personally it might fall a bit more first. We are down 5% presently.
I do see that my posts which express my opinion without being rude or offensive are routinely removed by people here reporting them, simply so my comments cannot be read.
We might as well be living in Russia. Free speech ha! what a joke.
There seems a concerted approach on this BB to impoverish AVCT holders by never allowing them to hear alternative views.
Thats ok, knock yourselves out. But don't kid yourselves, your best interest are being put front & centre.
Good luck
And the libellous nature of their bashing.
I can’t see any reason for normal PIs to be this persistent in bashing a share… it would take Co-ordination for sure. There could be a few arrogant big talker ones out there of course who would cut their nose off - but I think the persistence is the biggest clue.
I fully agree about it being co-ordinated. But I don’t think it’s more than a handful of people each with multiple accounts
Yeah bishop has done this before. Tries to take the heat off being outed as one of the scumbags on here. Likely wyndrum….then resurfaces after cleaning up a few of the libellous tweets (forgetting screenshots don’t dissaperar). He’ll be back.
As for the king of the dividend Touk….get some nee material, you were spouting this months and months ago. It’s been made clear no dividends. The company has a lot to be funding.
It’s either coordinated professional bashing or they’re monumentally unhinged. Either way, they’re worth avoiding. Why would you respond to either of those…Seems my filtering instincts were perfectly correct. What a desperately sad pitiful life they lead from their grubby sweaty infested basements.
That looks like a personal choice rather than a banning for Bishop. Let’s see if Wyn goes missing for the day too.
A dividend? Does he keep saying dividend or am I imagining it?
Old Bishop has been taken out (for now)
Hi touk
Yes Rippers did say that my impression is to avoid disappointment if sales are lower than early predictions,hence any sales are a bonus
He also said that you have no actual understanding about Avacta
Anyway despite what any shareholders might think
Here's what I think
Medusa19 set up the company nearly 2 years ago by successful businessmen,in that time they have had company overheads without the luxury of a fundraise like listed companies
I suspect they intend selling one or two Meduflow tests so they can keep the lights on