The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Madpunter if you cut population by 33% then you would have 44 million as opposed to 67 million.
That was the population in 1909.
Immigration isn't as big a problem as you think, give it ten years and we will require more immigration, otherwise we will not be able to pay pensions, man the NHS, or many other professions.
In the 1970's we had 6 working people for every pensioner.
In 2050 we are predicted to have 2 working people for every pensioner.
This pattern is being replicated in the western world.
WoodyB - I agree, but real environmental issues don't count only the MMGW scam. Controlling immigration could have reduced the population and hence pollution etc by 50%. Yet the.LibLabCon are all aligned on illegal immigration, plus even the Green Party.
You haven't listened to it have you madpunter.
It says exactly that.
The expert doctor says he was told by a researcher at Oxford university that they couldn't print the truth otherwise they would lose funding.
Complete rubbish as there was no funding to lose.
Sorry you and Mathersfinger might be taken in by this rubbish but I am not.
Quady - IMHO this doesn't imply funding for research at Oxford into the COVID jab, but funding in general, as the research councils are all top heavy with industrialists with vested interests. George Monbiot wrote about this power of the multinationals in 'Captive State: The Corporate Takeover of Britain' and on many occasions in the Guardian.
Spot on Madpunter, chronic over population, massive decline in wildlife, soil fertility, over farming, near death of our rivers with pesticides etc etc. The legacy media stubbornly refuse to acknowledge the link with the influx of people. The population increase has been an ecological disaster as far as I am concerned.
Sorry to post off Solgold.
It's the staffing issues which are the problem, creating a stressful workplace and a feeling of entitlement. Labour closed the cottage hospitals and estimated a 5% reduction in the UK population from 56m to 54m by 2030. Then they opened the floodgates to immigration and now we're heading for 74m+ or around a 45% gain. That's a swing of 50%, but we don't have 50% more frontline NHS employees or beds. There was one newspaper in the early noughties where they were articles about closing a secondary school due to pupil numbers declining and spending £16m on a new Midwifery Unit due to a boom in the birthrate in the same city.
Madpunter experts explain their reasoning and provide evidence why a peer reviewed study is wrong, so it can be reassessed.
You don't go on GB news or twitter.
Madpunter the video that Mathersfinger put up made the assertion that Oxford University would have their funding withdrawn.
Which was a lie as no funding had been given.
The reason many care home workers were afraid of the Covid vaccine was because people like you and Mathersfinger was taken in by false stories.
You’re right I don’t.
They’ve been taking the p*ss for the past 2 years wanting a 35% pay increase which they think is justified whilst holding the country to ransom.
Meanwhile consultants cover their shifts and get £7k for 12 hours.
No wonder the nhs is a bottomless pit of cash.
Try getting a GPs appointment.
Meanwhile go to a private hospital and it’s like chalk and cheese. The phones get answered, they update you on everything.
You walk in and out in 15 mins having seen a GP.
It’s like night and day
Oh yes, no middle f**king managers at a private hospital having meetings all day about meetings
Tesla - 80k Doctors, nurses and other NHS workers you suggest refused the COVID jab in the hope of catching COVID to get 10 days off work.
I see you have no respect for people working for the NHS.
Quady - I haven't stated that funding has been withdrawn. I have repeatedly asked you to explain why 80k NHS workers would risk their jobs and why Dr Aseem Malhotra, Dr John Campbell and Prof. John Ioannidis would risk their jobs and reputations? Plus why would Andrew Bridgen MP turn down promotion for expulsion from the Tory party just to tell the facts about the COVID jab? Are all these people deluded or principled.
There is a webinar at 4pm hosted by mining network and Arlington. Eric sprott, Pierre Lassonde, ned naylor Leyland, Michael Oliver and Luke Gromen. Must see for anyone interested in gold.
Quady,
Once again you didn’t read what I wrote, to have a Covid peer review with all the problems caused will take years just to assemble all facts before a peer review on these findings.
Read what I had written, you really are a numb skull, would you like me to draw you some pictures to explain it again?
Stop, think then reply to my post.
You are ignorant and arrogant, also you lack any comprehension of what is written in front of you
Don’t waste my time on your ignorance
Gold has added $25 billion and copper has added $28 billion in the ground since the PFS3 assumptions...
Even at 1% thats $0.53 billion or £424 million...
Current MCap £290 million...
Lol
You think 80k nurses didn’t want the vaccine because of the risks….. unbelievable
Or maybe 10 days off work, if in contact with a Covid patient, on full pay
🤔
Mathersfinger you really do talk utter garbage.
Of course peer reviewed studies have been done.
Link to a library of studies below.
I already know you don't accept scientific evidence, so fully expect you to reject it, às it's not based on feeling
Madpunter you certainly have the right name.
Show me proof that people have had funding withdrawn for not telling lies.
Strange that I require proof.
I do because I am level headed .
It's not one expert, it's many, plus 80k NHS worker's who if not experts, are in contact with experts and also working in a relevant industry.
But you’re dismissing something as a conspiracy precisely becuase you’re not capable of thinking critically about it!
This isn't the foolproof arguement you believe it is. Who knows what is happening in that man's life to say the things he is now saying. How do you know he isn't under a work investigation and is disgruntled and lashing out. Or, his family life has fallen apart, and he's going through a breakdown. Or, a midlife crisis and is desperate for purpose and wants attention. By pointing out that he is widely cited, doesn't mean f all, if he's recently suffered a brain injury and is now speaking rubbish. Your claim that he has everything to lose also may not be as true as you make out. His scientific career may be coming to a end and he's looking for new revenue streams. There's plenty of money and fame to be gained from him joining the conspiracy circuit. He reeks of arrogance.
Having an expert in the pocket is very convenient for the conspiracy theorists by the way. It removes any need for critical thought and the theorists just echo the content they've seen online.
This is my last post as this is a solg board.
Well the Chinese have better than expected growth figures and the US economy is still running hot from all that printed greenback
So we have plenty of suitors with deep pockets. Sadly thus far they have short arms
Ingo is still holding and expects the Chinese to eventually buy...
He can’t or doesn’t want to admit that he’s wrong
The media are trying to blindside us with constant rubbish every day to distract
But the fact of the matter remains that we have greater excess deaths than we did at the peak of covid and it’s happening in the vaccinated and in younger age groups
No amount of fingers in ears or heads in sand can change that
When last did the bbc have someone on who disputes the vaccine efficacy or the climate alarmism Quady?
You say science isn’t shut down, but the likes of the bbc have done just that….using our money
Red,
When you look at the belt and road going on, then take in all these other demands on copper etc, it makes Solgold a serious buy, let’s hope sooner rather than later.
Personally, after Sundays referendum in Ecuador, if all sails through then I expect to see Solgold start advancing it’s sp, I will be buying more if it goes through.
Atb