Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
According to ii today is the last day to vote
Yep Roxi they do
The teachers fund does hold assets totalling $318 billion so guess it's a credibility message rather than a dominate shareholder message.
Bit like Blackrock hitting the wires with something similar but ony holding 1.6m shares? They can still have a voice but have to say it's a bit embarrassing for them to be quoted based on having just over £100k invested.
Bit said really for a fund running $318 billion to be commenting on £100k investment.
mmm
Ha ha on the red owning more shares. Red. I enjoy reading your chats so not taking urine. Chuckled at the joke.
Will shares that have been purchased this week, still qualify for voting rights?? if anyone can enlighten me please.
Mog, good point. Of themselves they're no threat, so I wonder who else is aligned to BHP?
If it was only BHP surely the Board wouldn't be concerned?
TI, perhaps more appropriately; "They're behind you!"
"Oh no they're not."
etc, etc.
I've had a quick check and find it a bit strange the article written by Peter Ker wrt the "California State Teachers Retirement "
On their web site they appear to own 1,679,674 Solgold shares, unless they hold others somewhere else
Why were they even mentioned, Red owns more than them :)
https://www.calstrs.com/portfolio-holdings-international-equities
"Tensions between the SolGold register look set to flare again at the December 20 AGM, when American pension fund California State Teachers Retirement System will vote against SolGold’s remuneration report and against the re-election of Mr Mather"
As Spike Milligan sang...
"I'm walking backwards to Christmas...."
OH OH OH...,
Or were you suggesting we have found Holmium in one of our projects.lots of it...?.
HO HO HO
Christmas is coming late again this year!!!
HO HO HO
Agreed Add
We’ve had PFS’s before and they’ve never had the desired effect but I think this’ll be different. I honestly believe this will attract a lot of attention as the object of the exercise now is to demonstrate the viability to prospective buyers.
As for BHP, we have no way of knowing for sure whether they even want Cascabel/ Solg for themselves but I’m fairly sure they won’t be giving their shares away.
With the new PFS out and the charade of production finally put to bed I think things could be looking much brighter before too long.
Brilliant post addickt...
And there seems to be some Christmas spirit on this BB.
Glad tidings to all...
I see Quady has spent the night painting himself into a corner again.
It seems pretty obvious that there are now two entrenched opinions about our future; those who want a sale, as represented by the CGP mob and Mather, and those who want us to move towards production with a new Board. This seems to be the view of BHP and perhaps others - the Californian Teachers?
Given the nature of the relative shareholdings, we appear to have an impasse which rears its head at this time of year just like some terrible pantomime staring Christopher Biggins. How do we get away from this farrago? Because on thing's for sure; it's undermining any residual credibility just at the time we need it most i.e in our negotiations with the government. We cannot carry on like this.
The only answer I can think of is to make it crystal clear we are for sale ( I think most people know this already) and to make it equally clear to BHP that if they want to see this go all the way, they should make an offer. In other words, put up or shut up. We must force their hand.
For the past four years we've been in an appalling mess and are riven by division. This no way for a company with assets of of the quality we own, to progress. We must, and inevitably will, push the thing to a showdown and the way to do that is to allow SC to turn the company into an irresistibly attractive proposition.
Quady. As usual your ramblings bear nothing even relevant to what's been said.
1984, never said the vaccines were safe.
Reread his post and apologise, for once in your life accept your not the font of all knowledge, and can Infact be wrong.
Yet again, it's incredible.
Slug now admits the vaccines are safe and excess deaths are because of lockdown.
What an imbecile.
He also says he has a degree in mathematics.
If that was true he would of looked at how excess deaths are calculated in the UK.
It's the expected death rate taken on an actuarial basis and so looking at mortality and morbidity tables in order to work out the excess.
More likely deaths are to do with waiting lists in the NHS because this awful government has failed to provide the UK with a working NHS.
He really is the most unintelligent poster on here by every measure.
If any of you clowns brought a 1 million pound house, would you rely on what the owner told you, or would you arrange your own survey.
Of course you would do your own due diligence.
So why are you all pinning your hopes on solg producing their 3rd feasibility study to make you all millionaires
It means nothing, any prospective buyer will be conducting there own study.
And that in my opinion is why we're where we are.
Prospective buyers get in the data room, get to have a proper look, and like the new cfo we had for a fortnight ,after looking at the books run for the hills.
The fact there on the 3rd feasibility study.
The fact none of the data room visitors appear to be following up. The fact the cfo did a runner, after a very short time, are factual.
Adikt and his cohorts hysterically telling us their doing a good job, doesn't cut the mustard.
Adikt, I read with interest, your now claiming to have sold businesses. ( yawn).
Tell me did they take your word or did they do their own checks.
Should get some knockout news this morning then, should at least get us back to 8p 😢
On a separate note Quady, the ONS have finally acknowledged 2023 saw 1000 excess deaths per week.
Given we’ve lost a fair few “old uns”, what could be causing this huge increase?
Is it covid, vaccines or the lockdowns?
It can’t be the bug or the vaccines if the vaccines are indeed safe and effective? So it must be the lockdowns 😂🩼
Hahahhahahahahahah!!!!!
You’re going to secure finance against a fully owned asset with “NPV” of $3bn when the company eBay wholly owns the asset is worth only $400m?
It’s a bit like asking for a mortgage on a house you say is worth £5m that the estate agent has valued at £200k
Can you not see a problem with that?
But Quady, under a phased approach, won't the capacity be less?
And therefore the NPV will be (significantly?) reduced vs. the c$3bn post-tax NPV from original PFS?
i.e. actually a LOWER NPV to raise finance against?
And as others highlight, a terrible SP / MCap for any significant equity issue. (Unless a significant partner is willing to buy-in at a significant premium? But if so, why weren't they buying Berry Street or at these low levels?)
Laurel & Hardy were very smart Quady , probably why they are household names in our generation.
So can someone tell me where the 'Significant value to shareholders can be located ? they keep talking about it but I can't seem to find it ?
Even more unintelligent rubbish from the most unintelligent poster on here.
Nothing to do with market capitalisation.
The finance would be raised against a percentage of NPV.
Depending on how far we progress.
Plus maybe a JV.
Then a percentage of NPV offset against a royalty of some description.
Their are many ways to skin a cat or should I say a slug.
1 billion is easy to raise for Cascabel.
If we vote for all the resolutions.
Good grief
I’m afraid you don’t know what “your” talking about
A company worth £290m could dilute itself in half and raise £290m at best. We’d be worth 3.8p a share
How far is that going to go towards a $3bn capex?
If brains were made of s**t, you wouldn’t have enough to muster a skidmark