We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Will that jab cure it?
Lots of questions surrounding it.
I wouldn't take it.
Remember the covid jabs they issued. They guaranteed all sorts and claims of 100% effecacy kept on coming down and down to now people absconding of their advice to take it because of long term complications.
Will that
Blimey, you spend a lot of time on this bb for someone (presumably, by the negative posting) not invested here. Need another hobby....
Interesting article on sky news. Goes to show that what I said before the race for finding the cure is far greater than what we have to offer. And whatās to say if they arenāt at that stage already they donāt have the knowledge to also recognise and detect the cancer. Iāve said before itās not going to happen for Cizzle , would you invest in a company ( which no one is ) thatās not even got a test to market or would you invest in a company thatās already at the stage of curing cancer which means the know what causes it and could also provide a test.
October last year we was meant to see some changes to the SP , March this year was meant to see some changes to the sp and now nothing absolutely nothing coming out of this company. Time you all woke up and smelt the bacon
Jace / LB,
Nominee account (s)
I posted the following around 31/05/23 when i queried his disappearance from the significant holders list.
Shareholders are responsible for providing TR!'s when their holding meets the requirements.
The significant shareholder page on the website reflects the shareholder register.i.e. the legal owners of the shares, including nominees. TR!'s are different in that they reflect beneficial ownership, or more accurately, control of voting rights.
We can only go on the register itself in listing the significant shareholders, unless we are 100% sure of the relevant nominee position. To do anything different, would include double counting .
For example, with Mr Miller, we don't know which different nominees he holds his shares in.
Neil
That was my thoughts LB. I do wonder if we have holders being deducted or included in nominee accounts as per my post yesterday...
Anyone know why this Miller fella doesn't appear on the significant shareholders list?
https://cizzlebiotechnology.com/significant-shareholders/
With his holding and individual TR1 he should be listed there between Dr Dawn and Interactive
Maybe holding in a nominated account?
ATB LB
Ps NFX' demise nowt to do with Mr Miller - just a really poor company. They're still at it now. Totally useless
Only company I know where every single person in the company resigned, then the CEO has moved back in!
It is THAT Alan Miller.
And I could tell you a tale about Nuformix plc , Alan Miller, ( and ex Nuformix Chair - now Conduit CEO David Tapolczay, ex Nuformix CSO, now Conduit CSO Joanne Holland, a substantial "leaked " exaggerated article in the TIMES, and the subsequent mass dumping of shares by Mr Miller.
All above board legally and no suggestion any of the above leaked anything or did anything wrong
But doesn't exactly fill me with confidence that all these personnel seem to find their way into associated companies. And Tim Metcalfe represents NFX and Ciz.
It's just one of those areas where everyone knows each other.
If you mention the above on the Nuformix Board, there won't be too many smiles.
14p to 0.2p
This is the real Alan Miller I am thinking of ?? I wonder if Gina got a few too u dear the threshold ?
You are maybe right Jace, some of these small firms do end up being forced to chase holders for TR1s, but an investor like him should know his rules and in any case why release before he hit 5 or dropped to 4, no need. We all need to go figure, or just see it as a bit of chaos.
No Hog - it wasn't needed. Its a funny one.
I do wonder if the company is reaching out to update the shareholders register.
I also wonder if some of these large holders also hold on platforms that have reportable holdings and someone does the math if they are to update.
That's correct, we don't actually know when he got them and can only assume unless someone knows him or he could say on here.
I think there are more holdings RNS to followā¦ā¦
A smaller percentage of an enlarged and reduced in value total is the way I see it. Iām taking it as āgoodā but unsure why it was released as it is not required under the rules is it?
Got it thanks. I guess what's unclear is when Alan Miller got the additional 2M shares, might have been part of the placing or bought slowly over the past 2 years on the open market.
It's definitely positive news then as shows confidence.
Your calcs (not calls) - I hate autocorrect
Hi Daz - your calls omit the other raises we've had between the events noted by Cymru.
If you can backtrack to previous totals for shares in issue you might be able to see what was in issue exactly in Sept 22.
Holdings RNS Sept 2022 had Miller holding nearly 4.73% being just shy of 15Million shares
Todays Holding RNS has him holding nearly 4.25% holding just shy of 17Million shares
As below
2022 RNS Resulting situation on the date on which threshold was crossed or reached
Percent 4.73
Shares 14858844
Resulting situation on the date on which threshold was crossed or reached
Percent 4.25
Shares 16858844
So 2 Million share increase
Jace86 - not sure how you are getting increase in 2M shares unless I have misread something.
I'm reading his previous holdings were 4.73%, i.e. prior to the raise of ~31M shares (so total prior to raise being ~365M shares). 4.73% of 365M shares is ~17.3M shares.
The RNS states that it is now reduced to 4.25% of total of ~396M, ~16.8M shares. That's a reduction in shares unless I have calculated it against the wrong total for previous holdings?
I suppose it tells us that Mr Miller maintains his confidence in the future of the company....
Technically didn't need to publish it. No meaningful change in percentage held.
Increased holdings by 2m.
Decreased holdings due to increase of shares in issue.
Hardly worth the cost of publication!
Https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/CIZ/holdings-in-company-225hfcfo7b5a6a5.html
Should drop before the end of next week?
2 Apr 24 RNS: 'Cizzle will receive an up-front payment of US$100,000 within 30 days as a non-refundable fee to grant BIO an exclusive negotiating period of 120 days'