RE: My Green Flag14 Jan 2019 22:37
Part 2 - 'If I am being asked to sacrifice 14.4% of my holdings value for the peace of mind that 10,000 mtv will be achieved inside 2 years, then i am a player.
But there is something else that i really like about this move if indeed it pans out, and I repeat we are speculating here based on limited information.
Right now there are beliefs as to what the vanadium market will offer up in the next 2-3 years.A great many believe that stronger prices are here to stay for perhaps 3-4 years. Personally I seek assurances and risk aversive measures. My window for stronger prices to prevail, and by that I mean the $70 range, is 2 years at best. Not because I have solid evidence of additional supply but because I like my bets to be safe.
By delivering a path to 10,000 mtv inside the next 2 years or so, what BMN will do is demonstrate an ability to deliver the same profits it is making now at far lower prices. At 3,300 mtv and $80 per kg, BMN should deliver £95m in EBITDA, £7om in profits.
At 10,000 mtv they can do the same at under $40 per kg. Thus any fear of receding vanadium prices begins to dissipate allowing current prices to be enjoyed with reduced concerns over VRFB uptake because even limited success should help maintain that £70m or so base case profitability. In so doing the entire energy storage driven side of the business can be allowed to attack the market with added vanadium production support and still be considered a free carry to the investment case until that £70m starts gaining the respect it deserves in the valuation of the business.
That's why Chika Edeh said "we have had a number of institutional investors wanting to take a position in Bushveld but to do so we have to be listed on the JSE.”
I'll bet you have.'
We should not fear the 1 company that can take advantage of high demand for vanadium investing to generate substantial additional upside for shareholders.
Evidence-based responses are welcome. DYOR.