RE: AGM statement18 Dec 2024 13:23
IanB….. I am not wrong (yet)….. The contract might have been signed (multiple times)… but….. it has not “come in to being” as yet, so is meaningless. Once Santa Pete has actually declared that revenue has been received, I will concede. But until then, having a signed contract from 4 years ago with a DRC government that has likely changed personnel /ministers several times makes it seem worthless…and actually as it stands, there have been multiple raises (for them boots and equipment) by Wsg and there is absolutely nothing to show for it… The tories Rwanda plan springs to mind ( there was a contract there too) and guess what , nothing ever happened and Rwanda got to keep the money😳. I expect the same here. B