Member Info for yrabsmurruc

Panza, your missing the point, my comment is more aimed at confirming that Peter [even after completely fooking over his LTHs], still lies......... he constantly puts lipstick on the pig and this time, rather than admitting he placed with bucket shops is selling a complete lie by suggesting he has placed a significant amount with institutions and we will "likely" see more..TR1s... but only if they have 5%, so at the moment the biggest holder has 10M [3%]............ and as you say Panza, its just punt money........... Peter has not done a xmas party trading update........... speaks volumes........ B

Morning all, nice volume in the first hour.......... No more TR1s yet Peter... now now... you did say a significant number of the placing had been taken up by Instys........we all know what significant means, do you Peter.?............... B

and does the scope of the expansion to Build/operate include security.?......... a role currently provided by our friends WSG........... I am sure we have had the debate before, but some clarity from Peter will manage or set expectations. B

and a merry xmas to you too MOS and to all wsgers............ new, traders and last but not least the old [LTHs]........... 2021 cannot be worse.......... can it?. I look forward to Peters 2021 objectives. [tip]....the return of shareholder value should be closer to the top next year Peter..........B

Belfry,

I look forward to next weeks announcements then.......... seems some Insties are more excited to declare they own a piece of one of the 1000 most inspirational companies of 2020 than others.......... B

Jim,

to analyse this:
"I have been in touch with Peter and have asked following the disclosures of Harwood and Miton regarding the proportion of shares taken by institutions. He has affirmed that a "significant portion of it" although the disclosures will be led by the instis themselves some of whom are not bound to announce below 5%. With that said he expects to see more TR1s in due course. Let's see how things pan out"

first we have heard "significant" before, when attached to the size of WSG cut of the TEMA fee, it turned out to be "insignificant"................ but taking Peter at his word, then lets say 70M [more than half] of the 125M are now held by Institutions...... we have heard about 2 of them [Milton and Harwood]...... so that leaves 50M shares to be mentioned, either via TR1. [if over 5% then its a legal requirement and has to be done within x number of days], and if below that, they can volunteer to be added to the website.......... so, as we seem to have the situation where no one seems to have 5% or over...... [but could just be late reporting], that means either the new investors don't want to be on the website significant shareholders share register or have another reason to remain quiet.......... However, Peter says he expects more TR1s, and as that is the 5% or over flare...... then they should have declared by now [assuming its 3 days to declare]............ I will look out for this "expected" news............ as I trust Peter, and why would he lie to Jim........... having 25% in sticky hands means nothing as the remaining 75% is still plenty of swishing for traders..............I also look forward to the next MSC......... but looks like no xmas Trading Update........... I suppose we have had enough bad news for one year. Happy xmas all. B

morning all............................... B

and Aiming, what are you apologising for?........... you the sympathy police all of a sudden... not sure you can apologise on behalf of everybody on the BB can you? - dont remember voting for you to take on that role, but I am sure you mean well. I would however vote for Peter to be apologetic ?.............. bah humbug..............B

So, we have 3% BoD, 3% Harwood and 3% Milton................... still leaves 90% [250M] in the hands of retail...not really stability is it.......... considering we added another 40% to the share family........... so traders still in charge, and like all of Peters exaggerations, doesnt feel like a seismic change in the share register to reflect all those exciting cusps......... and at 4p [400K], not sure the Insties are taking that big of a risk if Pete fooks up again......... all though I do like the idea of Peter being held to account more than before as he no longer is the largest shareholder.......... B

No TR1 yet for Milton............and you are correct H&N, cannot remember when an II held 3%.... it would have to have been nearer 7% pre placement...... but I do see disappointment that Peter and the BoD have not put their hands in their pockets to absorb the dilution and show real skin in the game...... Pete down to less than 3%. now............ not kept up with the dilution. B

I don’t think there will be any TR1s, they will have to announce when they sell and that would embarrass Pete as he has them characterised as in for the long haul as they bought his story of dreams. They all magically bought 0.00001% under the reportable threshold of course. B

peeps leaving the bus at 3:80.......... feels like a loss to me, not waiting to hear about the new Insties and all the cusps that will magic themselves in January now Fooler has millions to splash out after he has paid off his credit card bill.......... B

NH........ and cake !. B

belfry......... here you go...

I love Peter [aka, Pasty Pete and Sir Cuspalot]
I love the Fowler Family..... [aka "the spongers"]
I love the 4p share price [aka "all time low]
I love having another 125M shares in the family
I love double digit growth [aka "no profit"]
I love TEMA [aka "no profit"]
I love IRAN MSC [aka "fake news"]
I love Vending Machines [aka "white elephant"]
I love Ferries, [aka "Propshaftgate"]
I loved DHC [aka "damn, havent enough space to write all his fake IDs]

Is that positive enough...........

B
I love

With 2m buys and only a 3% rise, one can assume there are a lot of shares to shift before any meaningful rise. Oh, I also presume the institution investors are sticky and waiting for that 16 p that the research note suggests is true value here...lol. B

well he got 40M votes, so at 25% of the shares held, he obviously has his believers for that moment he opens his mouth.......... He has his clean slate and we have 300M shares, does that feel like a good swap............. time will tell.......... sir cuspalot had better start working alot for his shareholders now............ , a number of Fowlers will feel let off today.......... but will he learn the lessons , time will tell. B

win, Peter did say

"It is encouraging to see a number of new and institutional investors supporting this placing and being supportive of our longer-term growth strategy, particularly as the placing was oversubscribed."

Why would we not believe him, the guy has our best interests at heart...............B

I look forward to seeing all the TR1s later this week. If Peter has not once again been economical with the truth, all those new Institutional investors falling over themselves to get a piece of Sir Peter cuspalot and will have to show themselves to the world......... I wonder how they do that without feeling embarrassed, especially as we will then see the TR1s later in the new year [when they get their 10%] as they drop below the threshold and declare they no longer hold an interest.......... B

Aiming, I only get offended when “scumbags” is used to describe disgruntled shareholders. The accuser then goes on to bang a drum on how well placed the company is and having the best time of its life. It certainly is having a good time at shareholders expense. Happy you are happy with the lowest share price in the company history especially as you can only comfort yourself with that long list of cusps that Peter has used to prize £5m of a bunch of loan sharks. B

NOPE........ But a biggy after close as well................B